Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · TH Open 2021; 05(01): e56-e65
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1722609
Original Article

Validation of the Role of Thrombin Generation Potential by a Fully Automated System in the Identification of Breast Cancer Patients at High Risk of Disease Recurrence

Patricia Gomez-Rosas 
1   Immunohematology and Transfusion Medicine, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
2   Hematology Service, Hospital General Regional Tecamac, IMSS, Estado de Mexico, Mexico
,
Marina Pesenti
1   Immunohematology and Transfusion Medicine, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
,
Cristina Verzeroli
1   Immunohematology and Transfusion Medicine, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
,
Cinzia Giaccherini
1   Immunohematology and Transfusion Medicine, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
,
Laura Russo
1   Immunohematology and Transfusion Medicine, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
,
Roberta Sarmiento
3   Oncology Unit, Hospitals San Filippo Neri and San Giovanni Addolorata, Rome, Italy
,
Giovanna Masci
4   Medical Oncology and Hematology, IRCCS Humanitas Institute, Rozzano, Italy
,
Luigi Celio
5   Medical Oncology and Hematology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
,
Mauro Minelli
3   Oncology Unit, Hospitals San Filippo Neri and San Giovanni Addolorata, Rome, Italy
,
Sara Gamba
1   Immunohematology and Transfusion Medicine, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
,
Carmen Julia Tartari
1   Immunohematology and Transfusion Medicine, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
,
Carlo Tondini
6   Oncology Unit, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
,
Francesco Giuliani
7   Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy
,
Fausto Petrelli
8   Oncology Unit, Hospital Treviglio-Caravaggio, Treviglio, Italy
,
Andrea D'Alessio
9   Department of Medicine, Gruppo San Donato, Policlinico San Marco, Bergamo, Italy
,
Giampietro Gasparini
3   Oncology Unit, Hospitals San Filippo Neri and San Giovanni Addolorata, Rome, Italy
,
Roberto Labianca
10   Department of Oncology Bergamo Province, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
,
Armando Santoro
4   Medical Oncology and Hematology, IRCCS Humanitas Institute, Rozzano, Italy
,
Filippo De Braud
5   Medical Oncology and Hematology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
,
Marina Marchetti‡   ∗
1   Immunohematology and Transfusion Medicine, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
,
Anna Falanga   ∗
1   Immunohematology and Transfusion Medicine, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
11   School of Medicine, University of Milan Bicocca, Italy
,
on behalf of the HYPERCAN Investigators › Author Affiliations Funding This study received support from Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC 5xmille 12237) and Fondazione ARTET Onlus.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background The measurement of thrombin generation (TG) potential by the calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT) assay provides a strong contribution in identifying patients at high risk of early disease recurrence (E-DR). However, CAT assay still needs standardization and clinical validation.

Objective In this study, we aimed to validate the role of TG for E-DR prediction by means of the fully automated ST Genesia system.

Methods A prospective cohort of 522 patients from the HYPERCAN study with newly diagnosed resected high-risk breast cancer was included. Fifty-two healthy women acted as controls. Plasma samples were tested for protein C, free-protein S, and TG by ST Genesia by using the STG-ThromboScreen reagent with and without thrombomodulin (TM).

Results In the absence of TM, patients showed significantly higher peak and ETP compared with controls. In the presence of TM, significantly lower inhibition of ETP and Peak were observed in patients compared with controls. E-DR occurred in 28 patients; these patients had significantly higher peak and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) in the absence of TM compared with disease-free patients. Multivariable analysis identified mastectomy, luminal B HER2-neg, triple negative subtypes, and ETP as independent risk factors for E-DR. These variables were combined to generate a risk assessment score, able to stratify patients in three-risk categories. The E-DR rates were 0, 4.7, and 13.5% in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories (hazard ratio = 8.7; p < 0.05, low vs. high risk).

Conclusion Our data validate the ETP parameter with a fully automated standardized system and confirm its significant contribution in identifying high-risk early breast cancer at risk for E-DR during chemotherapy.

Keywords

breast cancer - disease recurrence - hypercoagulability - risk model - thrombin generation

# A full list of the investigators of the HYPERCAN (HYPERcoagulation in CANcer) Study Group is provided in [Supplementary Material]. HYPERCAN is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov under the identifier: NCT02622815.


∗ These authors contributed equally as the co-last authors.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 23 September 2020

Accepted: 07 December 2020

Article published online:
10 February 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Eichinger S. Cancer associated thrombosis: risk factors and outcomes. Thromb Res 2016; 140 (Suppl. 01) S12-S17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Mahajan A, Brunson A, White R, Wun T. The epidemiology of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: an update. Semin Thromb Hemost 2019; 45 (04) 321-325
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Falanga A, Russo L, Milesi V. The coagulopathy of cancer. Curr Opin Hematol 2014; 21 (05) 423-429
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Falanga A. Thrombophilia in cancer. Semin Thromb Hemost 2005; 31 (01) 104-110
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Abdol Razak NB, Jones G, Bhandari M, Berndt MC, Metharom P. Cancer-associated thrombosis: an overview of mechanisms, risk factors, and treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2018; 10 (10) E380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Remiker AS, Palumbo JS. Mechanisms coupling thrombin to metastasis and tumorigenesis. Thromb Res 2018; 164 (Suppl. 01) S29-S33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Falanga A, Marchetti M, Vignoli A, Balducci D. Clotting mechanisms and cancer: implications in thrombus formation and tumor progression. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2003; 1 (11) 673-678
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rickles FR, Falanga A. Activation of clotting factors in cancer. Cancer Treat Res 2009; 148: 31-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Pabinger I, van Es N, Heinze G. et al. A clinical prediction model for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: a development and validation study in two independent prospective cohorts. Lancet Haematol 2018; 5 (07) e289-e298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Gerotziafas GT, Taher A, Abdel-Razeq H. et al; COMPASS–CAT Working Group. A predictive score for thrombosis associated with breast, colorectal, lung, or ovarian cancer: the prospective COMPASS-cancer-associated thrombosis study. Oncologist 2017; 22 (10) 1222-1231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Zwicker JI, Furie BC, Furie B. Cancer-associated thrombosis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2007; 62 (02) 126-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Giaccherini C, Marchetti M, Masci G. et al. Thrombotic biomarkers for risk prediction of malignant disease recurrence in patients with early stage breast cancer. Haematologica 2019
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Falanga A, Marchetti M. Hemostatic biomarkers in cancer progression. Thromb Res 2018; 164 (Suppl. 01) S54-S61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Falanga A, Marchetti M, Massi D. et al. Thrombophilic status may predict prognosis in patients with metastatic BRAFV600-mutated melanoma who are receiving BRAF inhibitors. J Am Acad Dermatol 2016; 74 (06) 1254-1256.e4 , e4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Falanga A, Santoro A, Labianca R. et al; HYPERCAN Study Group. Hypercoagulation screening as an innovative tool for risk assessment, early diagnosis and prognosis in cancer: the HYPERCAN study. Thromb Res 2016; 140 (Suppl. 01) S55-S59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Marchetti M, Giaccherini C, Masci G. et al; HYPERCAN Investigators. Thrombin generation predicts early recurrence in breast cancer patients. J Thromb Haemost 2020; 18 (09) 2220-2231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Tripodi A. Thrombin generation assay and its application in the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem 2016; 62 (05) 699-707
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 De Smedt E, Hemker HC. Thrombin generation is extremely sensitive to preheating conditions. J Thromb Haemost 2011; 9 (01) 233-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Dargaud Y, Wolberg AS, Gray E, Negrier C, Hemker HC. Subcommittee on Factor VIII, Factor IX, and Rare Coagulation Disorders. Proposal for standardized preanalytical and analytical conditions for measuring thrombin generation in hemophilia: communication from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15 (08) 1704-1707
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Duarte RCF, Rios DRA, Rezende SM, Jardim LL, Ferreira CN, Carvalho MDG. Standardization and evaluation of the performance of the thrombin generation test under hypo- and hypercoagulability conditions. Hematol Transfus Cell Ther 2019; 41 (03) 244-252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Dargaud Y, Luddington R, Gray E. et al. Standardisation of thrombin generation test--which reference plasma for TGT? An international multicentre study. Thromb Res 2010; 125 (04) 353-356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Dargaud Y, Wolberg AS, Luddington R. et al. Evaluation of a standardized protocol for thrombin generation measurement using the calibrated automated thrombogram: an international multicentre study. Thromb Res 2012; 130 (06) 929-934
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Spronk HM, Dielis AW, De Smedt E. et al. Assessment of thrombin generation II: validation of the calibrated automated thrombogram in platelet-poor plasma in a clinical laboratory. Thromb Haemost 2008; 100 (02) 362-364
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Ljungkvist M, Strandberg K, Berntorp E. et al. Evaluation of a standardized protocol for thrombin generation using the calibrated automated thrombogram: a Nordic study. Haemophilia 2019; 25 (02) 334-342
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Calzavarini S, Brodard J, Quarroz C. et al. Thrombin generation measurement using the ST Genesia Thrombin Generation System in a cohort of healthy adults: normal values and variability. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2019; 3 (04) 758-768
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Douxfils J, Morimont L, Bouvy C. et al. Assessment of the analytical performances and sample stability on ST Genesia system using the STG-DrugScreen application. J Thromb Haemost 2019; 17 (08) 1273-1287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Siguret V, Abdoul J, Delavenne X. et al. Rivaroxaban pharmacodynamics in healthy volunteers evaluated with thrombin generation and the active protein C system: modeling and assessing interindividual variability. J Thromb Haemost 2019; 17 (10) 1670-1682
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Pfrepper C, Metze M, Siegemund A, Klöter T, Siegemund T, Petros S. Direct oral anticoagulant plasma levels and thrombin generation on ST Genesia system. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2020; 4 (04) 619-627
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Roullet S, Labrouche S, Freyburger G. Comparison of two thrombin generation methods, CAT and ST-genesia, in liver transplant patients. Thromb Haemost 2019; 119 (06) 899-905
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Talon L, Sinegre T, Lecompte T. et al. Hypercoagulability (thrombin generation) in patients with cirrhosis is detected with ST-Genesia. J Thromb Haemost 2020; 18 (09) 2177-2190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Morrow GB, Beavis J, Harper S. et al. Coagulation status of critically ill patients with and without liver disease assessed using a novel thrombin generation analyzer. J Thromb Haemost 2020; 18 (07) 1576-1585
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Zermatten MG, Fraga M, Calderara DB, Aliotta A, Moradpour D, Alberio L. Biomarkers of liver dysfunction correlate with a prothrombotic and not with a prohaemorrhagic profile in patients with cirrhosis. JHEP Rep 2020; 2 (04) 100120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Mantovani A, Danese E, Salvagno GL. et al. Association between lower plasma adiponectin levels and higher plasma thrombin generation parameters in men with type 2 diabetes: role of plasma triglycerides. J Endocrinol Invest 2020
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG. et al; American Society of Clinical Oncology, College of American Pathologists. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2014; 138 (02) 241-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Loeffen R, Kleinegris MC, Loubele ST. et al. Preanalytic variables of thrombin generation: towards a standard procedure and validation of the method. J Thromb Haemost 2012; 10 (12) 2544-2554
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Colleoni M, Sun Z, Price KN. et al. Annual hazard rates of recurrence for breast cancer during 24 years of follow-up: results from the international breast cancer study group trials I to V. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34 (09) 927-935
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Bouwens EA, Stavenuiter F, Mosnier LO. Mechanisms of anticoagulant and cytoprotective actions of the protein C pathway. J Thromb Haemost 2013; 11 (Suppl. 01) 242-253
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Nijziel MR, van Oerle R, Christella M. et al. Acquired resistance to activated protein C in breast cancer patients. Br J Haematol 2003; 120 (01) 117-122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Tinholt M, Viken MK, Dahm AE. et al. Increased coagulation activity and genetic polymorphisms in the F5, F10 and EPCR genes are associated with breast cancer: a case-control study. BMC Cancer 2014; 14: 845
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Chaari M, Ayadi I, Rousseau A. et al. Impact of breast cancer stage, time from diagnosis and chemotherapy on plasma and cellular biomarkers of hypercoagulability. BMC Cancer 2014; 14: 991
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Tinholt M, Sandset PM, Mowinckel MC. et al. Determinants of acquired activated protein C resistance and D-dimer in breast cancer. Thromb Res 2016; 145: 78-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Falanga A, Schieppati F, Russo D. Cancer tissue procoagulant mechanisms and the hypercoagulable state of patients with cancer. Semin Thromb Hemost 2015; 41 (07) 756-764
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar