Surgical Gloves in Orthopedic Trauma Procedures: How Many Lose Their Integrity?^[*]

Abstract

Introduction The possibility of perforation of gloves during orthopedic surgeries can reach 56.8%, and it mainly related to the manipulation of blunt instruments. Surgeries for the treatment of fractures and trauma present additional risk due to contact with bone spires.

Objective Analysis of the prevalence of loss of integrity of surgical gloves in orthopedic trauma procedures, especially fractures, and evaluation of the surgeon's exposure and contact with secretions from the patient.

Methods Macroscopic inspection of the gloves of two surgeons specialized in trauma, over a period of 4 months. Both used two gloves for all procedures and, at the end of the surgery, analyzed the presence or absence of blood stains on the internal gloves and/or fingers. The procedures were categorized according to the time and type of surgery. The intercurrence investigated was the perforation of one or two gloves; if the tear was perceived immediately or only at the end of the surgery, and the location of and reason for the tear, if identified.

Results A total of 210 surgeries were included, 87 of which presented perforations, with 17 cases occurring in both gloves and 70 only in the outer glove. Finally, there was a more significant relationship with open focus surgeries and duration > 60 minutes.

Conclusion Our results suggest that greater care and inspection of gloves to look for damage are needed in prolonged surgeries with an open focus.

Keywords

orthopedic surgeons - gloves, surgical - protection - traumatology

^* Work developed in the Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Publication History

Received: 22 June 2020

Accepted: 16 September 2020

Article published online:
01 July 2021

• Referências

• 1 Tanner J, Parkinson H. Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 2006 (03) CD003087
• 2 Sanders R, Fortin P, Ross E, Helfet D. Outer gloves in orthopaedic procedures. Cloth compared with latex. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990; 72 (06) 914-917
• 3 Sebold EJ, Jordan LR. Intraoperative glove perforation. A comparative analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; (297) 242-244
• 4 Hayes G, Singh A, Gibson T. et al. Influence of orthopedic reinforced gloves versus double standard gloves on contamination events during small animal orthopedic surgery. Vet Surg 2017; 46 (07) 981-985
• 5 Chan KY, Singh VA, Oun BH, To BH. The rate of glove perforations in orthopaedic procedures: single versus double gloving. A prospective study. Med J Malaysia 2006; 61 (Suppl B): 3-7
• 6 Maffulli N, Capasso G, Testa V. Glove perforation in elective orthopedic surgery. Acta Orthop Scand 1989; 60 (05) 565-566
• 7 Laine T, Aarnio P. Glove perforation in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. A comparison between single, double indicator gloving and double gloving with two regular gloves. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86 (06) 898-900
• 8 Nicolai P, Aldam CH, Allen PW. Increased awareness of glove perforation in major joint replacement. A prospective, randomised study of Regent Biogel Reveal gloves. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997; 79 (03) 371-373
• 9 Louis SS, Steinberg EL, Gruen OA, Bartlett CS, Helfet DL. Outer gloves in orthopaedic procedures: a polyester/stainless steel wire weave glove liner compared with latex. J Orthop Trauma 1998; 12 (02) 101-105
• 10 Enz A, Klinder A, Mittelmeier H, Kundt G, Mittelmeier W, Zaatreh S. Damages with High Consequences: Analysis of Perforations in Surgical Latex Operation Gloves from Orthopedic Surgeries. Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp) 2018; 8 (04) 159-162
• 11 Lee SW, Cho MR, Lee HH, Choi WK, Lee JH. Perforation of Surgical Gloves during Lower Extremity Fracture Surgery and Hip Joint Replacement Surgery. Hip Pelvis 2015; 27 (01) 17-22
• 12 Hester RA, Nelson CL, Harrison S. Control of contamination of the operative team in total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1992; 7 (03) 267-269