CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Social Health and Diabetes 2020; 8(01): 018-024
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1722421
Original Article

The Multigenerational Legacy of Diabetes, Emotional Reactions, and Insulin Adherence

Melissa Scollan-Koliopoulos
1   Division of Primary Care Mental Health, Transformative Health and Behavior Solutions, Ringwood, New Jersey, United States
› Institutsangaben
FundingThis project was funded by the Foundation of the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey.


Purpose The purpose of this study was to estimate the effect of having a multigenerational legacy of diabetes on insulin adherence by measuring memories of family members’ experiences with insulin self-injection.

Methods A cross-sectional correlational design was implemented by surveying hospitalized adults with type 2 diabetes who recently transitioned to using insulin. Surveys included items about the vividness, frequency, and controllability of memories of a family member self-injecting insulin and concordant emotional reaction, and one’s own emotional reaction to a diagnosis of diabetes and insulin regimen adherence.

Results A diverse sample responded to the surveys. Significant associations were revealed between having a recollection of a family member fearing insulin injections and a negative emotional reaction toward one’s own diabetes diagnosis with suboptimal insulin adherence. Suboptimal insulin adherence may be an indication of avoidance-based coping. Inquiry into how a multigenerational legacy of diabetes influences individual coping styles for diabetes self-management will help clinicians identify patients at risk for suboptimal insulin adherence.


Artikel online veröffentlicht:
21. Dezember 2020

© 2020. 2020 Nordisk Education Foundation. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

  • References

  • 1 Centers for Disease Control. (2017). National Diabetes Statistics Report. Available at: Accessed February 1, 2019
  • 2 Scollan-Koliopoulos MM, O’Connoll KA, Walker E. Multigenerational legacies of diabetes and illness representation: a useful framework for facilitating health behavior. Clin Nurse Spec 2005; 19: 302-307
  • 3 Scollan-Koliopoulos M, O’Connell KA, Walker EA. Legacy of diabetes and self-care behavior. Res Nurs Health 2007; 30 (05) 508-517
  • 4 Davies MJ, Gagliardino JJ, Gray LJ, Khunti K, Mohan V, Hughes R. Real-world factors affecting adherence to insulin therapy in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Diabet Med 2013; 30 (05) 512-524
  • 5 Sokol MC, McGuigan KA, Verbrugge RR, Epstein RS. Impact of medication adherence on hospitalization risk and healthcare cost. Med Care 2005; 43 (06) 521-530
  • 6 Capoccia K, Odegard PS, Letassy N. Medication adherence with diabetes medication: a systematic review of the literature. Diabetes Educ 2016; 42 (01) 34-71
  • 7 Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ 2000;321(7258) :405–412
  • 8 Gatwood J, Erickson SR. Medication adherence: the search for interventions that work. Am J Manag Care 2010; 16 (12) 925-926
  • 9 Peyrot M, Barnett AH, Meneghini LF, Schumm-Draeger PM. Insulin adherence behaviours and barriers in the multinational global attitudes of patients and physicians in insulin therapy study. Diabet Med 2012; 29 (05) 682-689
  • 10 Conway MA, Anderson SJ, Larsen SF. et al. The formation of flashbulb memories. Mem Cognit 1994; 22 (03) 326-343
  • 11 Scollan-Koliopoulos M, Walker EA, Bleich D. Perceived risk of amputation, emotions, and foot self-care among adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2010; 36 (03) 473-482
  • 12 Delgado MR, Locke HM, Stenger VA, Fiez JA. Dorsal striatum responses to reward and punishment: effects of valence and magnitude manipulations. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2003; 3 (01) 27-38
  • 13 Tricomi E, Fiez JA. Information content and reward processing in the human striatum during performance of a declarative memory task. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2012; 12 (02) 361-372
  • 14 Rolland JS, Families, Illness, & Disability: An Integrative Treatment Model New York: Basic Books
  • 15 Stevens J, (; 2002 ) Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences 4th edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  • 16 Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care 2000; 23 (07) 943-950
  • 17 Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. The brief illness perception questionnaire. J Psychosom Res 2006; 60 (06) 631-637
  • 18 Scollan-Koliopoulos M, O’Connell KA, Walker EA. The context of a legacy of diabetes: correlates of self-care behavior. Diabetes Educ 2007; 33 (02) 315-324
  • 19 SPSS Inc. Released 2009. PASW Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc
  • 20 Myers J, Well A, Research Design and Statistical Analysis 2nd edition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2003
  • 21 Kihlstrom J, Eich E, Sandbrand D, Tobias B. Emotion and memory: Implications for self-report. In: Stone A, Turkkan J, Bachrach C, Jobe J, Kurtzman H, Cain V, eds. The Science of Self-Report: Implications for Research and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000:81–100
  • 22 Menon G, Yorkston E, The use of memory and contextual cues in the formation of behavioral frequency judgements. In: Stone A, Turkkan J, Bachrach J, Jobe J, Kurtzman H, Cain V, eds. The Science of Self-Report: Implications for Research and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000:63–80
  • 23 Kleinsmith LJ, Kaplan S. Paired-associate learning as a function of arousal and interpolated interval. J Exp Psychol 1963; 65: 190-193
  • 24 Bradburn N, (; 2000 ). Temporal representation and event dating. In: Stone A, Turkkan J, Bachrach C, Jobe J, Kurtzman H, Cain V, eds. The Science of Self-Report: Implications for Research and Practice Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000:49–62
  • 25 Lepore SJ. Expressive writing moderates the relation between intrusive thoughts and depressive symptoms. J Pers Soc Psychol 1997; 73 (05) 1030-1037
  • 26 Harris CR, Pashler H. Enhanced memory for negatively emotionally charged pictures without selective rumination. Emotion 2005; 5 (02) 191-199
  • 27 Talarico JM, Rubin DC. Confidence, not consistency, characterizes flashbulb memories. Psychol Sci 2003; 14 (05) 455-461
  • 28 Larkin ME, Capasso VA, Chen CL. et al. Measuring psychological insulin resistance: barriers to insulin use. Diabetes Educ 2008; 34 (03) 511-517
  • 29 Fisher L, Glasgow RE, Strycker LA. The relationship between diabetes distress and clinical depression with glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2010; 33 (05) 1034-1036
  • 30 Jones LE, Doebbeling CC. Depression screening disparities among veterans with diabetes compared with the general veteran population. Diabetes Care 2007; 30 (09) 2216-2221
  • 31 Katon WJ, Von Korff M, Lin EH. et al. The pathways study: a randomized trial of collaborative care in patients with diabetes and depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004; 61 (10) 1042-1049
  • 32 Ahmed Z, Yeasmeen F. Active family participation in diabetes self-care: a commentary. Diabetes Management 2016; 6: 104-107
  • 33 Yavuz DG, Ozcan S, Deyneli O. Adherence to insulin treatment in insulin-naïve type 2 diabetic patients initiated on different insulin regimens. Patient Prefer Adherence 2015; 9: 1225-1231