Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology 2021; 04(02): 149-153
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1722356
Original Article

Significance and Impact of the Intersphincteric Plane Sepsis in the Management of the Perianal Sepsis: Ultrasound Study

Ashraf Talaat Youssef
1   Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background The intersphincteric plane (ISP) is a potential space between the external and the internal anal sphincters. About 90% of the perianal sepsis is caused by an obstruction of the ducts of anal glands with subsequent secondary bacterial infection. The imaging modalities used to diagnose perianal sepsis are the ultrasound via endoanal and transperineal routes and magnetic resonance imaging.

Objective  The study aimed to identify the various patterns of the ISP sepsis and their incidence among our study group and to clarify the significance of ISP in the pathogenesis of anorectal abscesses and various types of perianal fistula tracts, to optimize the surgical management.

Methods Retrospective descriptive study in which 57 patients with an ISP sepsis were evaluated with full medical history, clinical exam, and ultrasound; the final diagnosis was based on combining the results of ultrasound, digital rectal examination under anesthesia, and the operative results.

Results The current study showed many patterns of the ISP sepsis and estimated the incidence of each pattern among our study group; such patterns could be fistula tracts, sinus tracts, abscesses, intersphincteric abscess with supralevator extension, sinus with abscess formation, fistula with abscess formation, distension of the ISP with free pus, and other complex patterns like horse abscess, abscess with transsphincteric sinus, and ISP fistula/sinus with transsphincteric branches.

Conclusion Understanding the role of the ISP in the pathogenesis of anorectal abscesses and perianal fistula tracts can help in reaching the optimum way of management.

Keywords

intersphincteric plane sepsis - management of perianal fistula - anorectal abscess - pathogenesis of perianal fistula - transperineal ultrasound


Publication History

Article published online:
10 January 2021

© 2021. Indian Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Hassan A, Al Mamun A. Surgical anatomy of anal canal and rectum. In: Chowdri N, Parray F. eds. Benign Anorectal Disorders. New Delhi: Springer; 2016
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Whiteford MH. Perianal abscess/fistula disease. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2007; 20 (02) 102-109
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Rizzo JA, Naig AL, Johnson EK. Anorectal abscess and fistula-in-ano: evidence-based management. Surg Clin North Am 2010; 90 (01) 45-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 1976; 63 (01) 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Lavazza A, Maconi G. Transperineal ultrasound for assessment of fistulas and abscesses: a pictorial essay. J Ultrasound 2019; 22 (02) 241-249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Torkzad MR, Karlbom U. MRI for assessment of anal fistula. Insights Imaging 2010; 1 (02) 62-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N. Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease. 7th edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Kurihara H, Kanai T, Ishikawa T. et al. A new concept for the surgical anatomy of posterior deep complex fistulas: the posterior deep space and the septum of the ischiorectal fossa. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49 (Suppl. 10) S37-S44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Garg P. Understanding and treating supralevator fistula-in-ano: MRI analysis of 51 cases and a review of literature. Dis Colon Rectum 2018; 61 (05) 612-621
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Garg P. Transanal opening of intersphincteric space (TROPIS) - a new procedure to treat high complex anal fistula. Int J Surg 2017; 40: 130-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Almeida IS, Wickramasinghe D, Weerakkody P, Samarasekera DN. Treatment of fistula in-ano with fistula plug: experience of a tertiary care centre in South Asia and comparison of results with the West. BMC Res Notes 2018; 11 (01) 513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cirocchi R, Farinella E, La Mura F. et al. Fibrin glue in the treatment of anal fistula: a systematic review. Ann Surg Innov Res 2009; 3: 12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kim DS. Advancement flap for the treatment of a complex anal fistula. Ann Coloproctol 2014; 30 (04) 161-162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Wallin UG, Mellgren AF, Madoff RD, Goldberg SM. Does ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract raise the bar in fistula surgery?. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55 (11) 1173-1178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Zhang H, Zhou ZY, Hu B. et al. Clinical significance of 2 deep posterior perianal spaces to complex cryptoglandular fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 2016; 59 (08) 766-774
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Siddiqui MRS, Ashrafian H, Tozer P. et al. A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of endoanal ultrasound and MRI for perianal fistula assessment. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55 (05) 576-585
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Youssef AT. Imaging classification of perianal fistula using the ultrasound.. J Gastroenterol Hepatol Res 2015; 4 (06) 1653-1659
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar