CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2020; 53(03): 324-334
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721870
CME Article

Midface Reconstruction: Planning and Outcome

Gautam Biswas
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, TATA Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Reconstruction of the complex anatomy and aesthetics of the midface is often a challenge. A careful understanding of this three-dimensional (3D) structure is necessary. Anticipating the extent of excision and its planning following oncological resections is critical.

In the past over two decades, with the advances in microsurgical procedures, contributions toward the reconstruction of this area have generated interest. Planning using digital imaging, 3D printed models, osseointegrated implants, and low-profile plates, has favorably impacted the outcome. However, there are still controversies in the management: to use single composite tissues versus multiple tissues; implants versus autografts; vascularized versus nonvascularized bone; prosthesis versus reconstruction.

This article explores the present available options in maxillary reconstruction and outlines the approach in the management garnered from past publications and experiences.



Publication History

Article published online:
31 December 2020

© 2020. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Neligan PC, Lipa JE. Reconstruction of the midface. In: Evans GRD, Butler CE, eds. Procedures in Reconstructive Surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders 2009: 139-152
  • 2 Taylor GI, Corlett RJ, Ashton MW. The evolution of free vascularized bone transfer: a 40-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (04) 1292-1305
  • 3 Watanabe K, Takahashi N, Morihisa Y. et al. Maxillary reconstruction using chimeric flaps of the subscapular artery system without vein grafts and the novel usage of chimeric flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (09) 601-606
  • 4 Peng X, Mao C, Yu GY, Guo CB, Huang MX, Zhang Y. Maxillary reconstruction with the free fibula flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (06) 1562-1569
  • 5 Iyer S, Thankappan K. Maxillary reconstruction: current concepts and controversies. Indian J Plast Surg 2014; 47 (01) 8-19
  • 6 Andrades P, Militsakh O, Hanasono MM, Rieger J, Rosenthal EL. Current strategies in reconstruction of maxillectomy defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 137 (08) 806-812
  • 7 Okay DJ, Genden E, Buchbinder D, Urken M. Prosthodontic guidelines for surgical reconstruction of the maxilla: a classification system of defects. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86 (04) 352-363
  • 8 Cordeiro PG, Santamaria E. A classification system and algorithm for reconstruction of maxillectomy and midfacial defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (07) 2331-2346, discussion 2347–2348
  • 9 Brown JS. Maxillary reconstruction. Indian J Plast Surg 2007; 40: 35-43
  • 10 Chang DW, Langstein HN. Use of the free fibula flap for restoration of orbital support and midfacial projection following maxillectomy. J Reconstr Microsurg 2003; 19 (03) 147-152
  • 11 Costa H, Zenha H, Sequeira H. et al. Microsurgical reconstruction of the maxilla: algorithm and concepts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (05) e89-e104
  • 12 Alam D, Ali Y, Klem C, Coventry D. The evolution of complex microsurgical midface reconstruction: a classification scheme and reconstructive algorithm. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2016; 24 (04) 593-603
  • 13 Eckardt A, Teltzrow T, Schulze A, Hoppe M, Kuettner C. Nasalance in patients with maxillary defects—reconstruction versus obturation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2007; 35 (4-5) 241-245
  • 14 Rieger J, Bohle G Iii, Huryn J, Tang JL, Harris J, Seikaly H. Surgical reconstruction versus prosthetic obturation of extensive soft palate defects: a comparison of speech outcomes. Int J Prosthodont 2009; 22 (06) 566-572
  • 15 Connolly TM, Sweeny L, Greene B, Morlandt A, Carroll WR, Rosenthal EL. Reconstruction of midface defects with the osteocutaneous radial forearm flap: evaluation of long term outcomes including patient reported quality of life. Microsurgery 2017; 37 (07) 752-762
  • 16 Santamaria E, Cordeiro PG. Reconstruction of maxillectomy and midfacial defects with free tissue transfer. J Surg Oncol 2006; 94 (06) 522-531
  • 17 Dalgorf D, Higgins K. Reconstruction of the midface and maxilla. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 16 (04) 303-311
  • 18 Bidros RS, Metzinger SE, Guerra AB. The thoracodorsal artery perforator-scapular osteocutaneous (TDAP-SOC) flap for reconstruction of palatal and maxillary defects. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 54 (01) 59-65
  • 19 Brown JS. Deep circumflex iliac artery free flap with internal oblique muscle as a new method of immediate reconstruction of maxillectomy defect. Head Neck 1996; 18 (05) 412-421
  • 20 Futran ND, Wadsworth JT, Villaret D, Farwell DG. Midface reconstruction with the fibula free flap. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 128 (02) 161-166
  • 21 Fisher M, Dorafshar A, Bojovic B, Manson PN, Rodriguez ED. The evolution of critical concepts in aesthetic craniofacial microsurgical reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (02) 389-398
  • 22 Jang WH, Lee JM, Jang S, Kim HD, Ahn KM, Lee JH. Mirror image based three-dimensional virtual surgical planning and three-dimensional printing guide system for the reconstruction of wide maxilla defect using the deep circumflex iliac artery free flap. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30 (06) 1829-1832
  • 23 Lenox ND, Kim DD. Maxillary reconstruction. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2013; 25 (02) 215-222
  • 24 Parrett BM, Pribaz JJ. An algorithm for treatment of nasal defects. Clin Plast Surg 2009; 36 (03) 407-420
  • 25 Burget GC, Walton RL. Optimal use of microvascular free flaps, cartilage grafts, and a paramedian forehead flap for aesthetic reconstruction of the nose and adjacent facial units. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (05) 1171-1207, discussion 1208–1216
  • 26 Pribaz JJ, Weiss DD, Mulliken JB, Eriksson E. Prelaminated free flap reconstruction of complex central facial defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (02) 357-365, discussion 366–367
  • 27 O¨zkan O, Coşkunfirat OK, O¨zkan O. Midface reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2010; 24 (02) 181-187
  • 28 Foster RD, Anthony JP, Singer MI, Kaplan MJ, Pogrel MA, Mathes SJ. Reconstruction of complex midfacial defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (06) 1555-1565
  • 29 Fanucci E, Fiaschetti V, Fusco N. et al. Role of diagnostic imaging to malignant sinus tumors in presurgical staging. Oral Implantol (Rome) 2008; 1 (02) 56-65
  • 30 Saad A, Winters R, Wise MW. Dupin CL, St Hilaire H. Virtual surgical planning in complex composite maxillofacial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (03) 626-633
  • 31 Jacobs CA, Lin AY. A new classification of three-dimensional printing technologies: systematic review of three-dimensional printing for patient-specific craniomaxillofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (05) 1211-1220
  • 32 He Y, Zhu HG, Zhang ZY, He J, Sader R. Three-dimensional model simulation and reconstruction of composite total maxillectomy defects with fibula osteomyocutaneous flap flow-through from radial forearm flap. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108 (06) e6-e12
  • 33 Mertens C, Löwenheim H, Hoffmann J. Image data based reconstruction of the midface using a patient-specific implant in combination with a vascularized osteomyocutaneous scapular flap. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2013; 41 (03) 219-225
  • 34 Stranix JT, Stern CS, Rensberger M. et al. A virtual surgical planning algorithm for delayed maxillomandibular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143 (04) 1197-1206
  • 35 Rodriguez ED, Bluebond-Langner R, Park JE, Manson PN. Preservation of contour in periorbital and midfacial craniofacial microsurgery: reconstruction of the soft-tissue elements and skeletal buttresses. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (05) 1738-1747, discussion 1748–1749
  • 36 Pang JH, Brooke S, Kubik MW. et al. Staged reconstruction (delayed-immediate) of the maxillectomy defect using CAD/CAM technology. J Reconstruct Microsurg 2018; 34 (03) 193-199
  • 37 Yilmaz M, Vayvada H, Menderes A, Demirdover C, Kizilkaya A. A comparison of vascularized fibular flap and iliac crest flap for mandibular reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 2008; 19 (01) 227-234
  • 38 Smith Nobrega A, Santiago Jr JF, de Faria Almeida DA, Dos Santos DM, Pellizzer EP, Goiato MC. Irradiated patients and survival rate of dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 116 (06) 858-866
  • 39 Chang YM, Santamaria E, Wei FC. et al. Primary insertion of osseointegrated dental implants into fibula osteoseptocutaneous free flap for mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (03) 680-688
  • 40 Patel SY, Kim DD, Ghali GE. Maxillofacial reconstruction using vascularized fibula free flaps and endosseous implants. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2019; 31 (02) 259-284
  • 41 Patel A, Levine J, Brecht L, Saadeh P, Hirsch DL. Digital technologies in mandibular pathology and reconstruction. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2012; 20 (01) 95-106