RSS-Feed abonnieren
PDF herunterladen
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721869
Anthropometric Determinations of Umbilical Position in Iraqi Adults
Abstract
Introduction Umbilicus is an important surface landmark on the anterior abdominal wall in addition to its aesthetic and psychological effect.
Objectives The objective of the study is to determine the position of umbilicus in Iraqi adults to provide a guide for the neoumbilicus in abdominoplasty.
Subjects and Methods This is an observational study performed on 100 volunteers with no abdominal wall abnormality. Measurements included weight, height, body mass index (BMI), distance from xiphoid to umbilicus, distance from xiphoid process to pubic symphysis, distance from xiphoid process to both anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), distance from pubic symphysis to umbilicus and from pubic symphysis to xiphisternum, distance of umbilicus to both ASIS, and distance of umbilicus to interspinous line and to inter-anterior hypochondrium line.
Results The study included 100 volunteers, with 50% male and 50% female whose age ranges between 18 to 60 years. The results were a follows: distance from xiphoid process to umbilicus and distance from xiphoid process to pubic symphysis were 18.03 ± 3.25 cm and 32.21 ± 4.64 cm, respectively; distances from xiphoid process to right ASIS and left ASIS were 25.95 ± 5.72 cm and 25.84 ± 6.02 cm, respectively; distance from pubic symphysis to umbilicus was 17.66 ± 3.12 cm; distance of umbilicus to interspinous line was 9.25 ± 1.84 cm. The distance from umbilicus to inter anterior hypochondrium line was 9.905 ± 2.19 cm.
Conclusion These measurements can determine the neoumbilicus position, reduce practical mistakes, and improve postsurgical outcomes.
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
26. Dezember 2020
© 2020. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Fahmy M. Umbilicus and Umbilical Cord. Cham. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG; 2018: 105-108
- 2 Snell R. Clinical Anatomy by Regions. 9th ed. Walters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2012: 151
- 3 Hegazy AA. Anatomy and embryology of umbilicus in newborns: a review and clinical correlations. Front Med 2016; 10 (03) 271-277
- 4 Fawkner-Corbett D, Nicholson JA, Bullen T. Cross P, Bailey D, Scott MH. Anatomical variation in the position of the umbilicus and the implications for laparoscopic surgery. Int J Surg 2010; 8 (07) 540-578
- 5 Du-Plessis DJ. A Synopsis of Surgical Anatomy. 11th ed. Bristol: John Wright and Son Ltd; 1975
- 6 Smith T, Pinnock C, Lin T, Jones R.. Fundamentals of Anesthesia. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009: 77-104
- 7 Farquharson M, Hollingshead J, Moran B. Farquharson’s Textbook of Operative General Surgery (9th edn). London, United Kingdom: Hodder Arnold; 200W5 201
- 8 Williams AM, Brain JL. The normal position of the umbilicus in the newborn: an aid to improving the cosmetic result in exomphalos major. J Pediatr Surg 2001; 36 (07) 1045-1046
- 9 Davari H, Nazem M. The normal position of umbilicus in the newborn: an aid to improve cosmetic result in exomphalos major. J Res Med Sci 2004; 1: 34-38
- 10 Shaw WW, Aston SJ, Zide BM. Reconstruction of the trunk. In: Joseph GM. ed. Plastic Surgery. Volume 6. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1990: 3675-3796
- 11 Marconi F. Reconstruction of the umbilicus: a simple technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 95 (06) 1115-1117
- 12 Harii K, Torii S, Nakajima T, Aoyama H, Matsuo K. Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery. Amsterdam: Kugler Publications BV; 1995: 149
- 13 Hunstad JP, Repta R. The umbilicus in body contouring. In: Atlas of Abdominoplasty. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc; 2009: 141-156
- 14 Schwartz SI, Brunicardi FC. eds. Schwartz's Principles of Surgery. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2010
- 15 Joseph WJ, Sinno S, Brownstone ND, Mirrer J, Thanik VD. Creating the perfect umbilicus: A systematic review of recent literature. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2016; 40 (03) 372-379
- 16 Parnia R, Ghorbani L, Sepehrvand N, Hatami S, Bazargan-Hejazi S. Determining anatomical position of the umbilicus in Iranian girls, and providing quantitative indices and formula to determine neo-umbilicus during abdominoplasty. Indian J Plast Surg 2012; 45 (01) 94-96
- 17 Abhyankar SV, Rajguru AG, Patil PA. Anatomical localization of the umbilicus: an Indian study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (04) 1153-1157
- 18 Bilgen F, Duman Y, Ural A, Bekerecioglu M. Determining anatomical position of the
umbilicus in Turkish population. Indian J Surg 2020
MissingFormLabel
- 19 Rodriguez-Feliz JR, Makhijani S, Przybyla A, Hill D, Chao J. Intraoperative assessment of the umbilicopubic distance: a reliable anatomic landmark for transposition of the umbilicus. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012; 36 (01) 8-17
- 20 Duduković M, Kisić H, Baez ML. et al. Anatomical prediction for surgical positioning of the umbilicus in a white population. Ann Plast Surg 2015; 75 (02) 135-139