PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2021; 56(04): 504-512
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721367
Artigo Original
Pé e Tornozelo

Percutaneous Hallux Valgus: An Algorithm for the Surgical Treatment[*]

Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: português | English
Igor Marijuschkin 
1   Hospital São Lucas, Santos, SP, Brasil
,
Matheus Levy Souza 
2   Hospital Mater Dei, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
,
José Luiz Garcia Diaz 
1   Hospital São Lucas, Santos, SP, Brasil
,
Paulo Carvalho 
3   Hospital Ortopédico de Santana, Parede, Portugal
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective To present the clinical and radiographic results of hallux valgus surgical correction using four percutaneous techniques, chosen according to a predefined radiographic classification.

Methods We prospectively evaluated 112 feet in 72 patients with hallux valgus operated over the course of 1 year. Percutaneous distal soft tissue release (DSTR) and the Akin procedure (DSTR-Akin) were performed in mild cases. In mild to moderate hallux valgus with distal metatarsal joint angle > 10°, we added the Reverdin-Isham (RI) osteotomy. In moderate cases with joint incongruity, we performed the percutaneous chevron (PCH). Finally, a Ludloff-like percutaneous proximal osteotomy fixed (PPOF) with a screw was proposed in severe cases with an intermetatarsal angle (IMA) > 17°. According to these criteria, 26 DSTRs-Akin, 36 PCHs, 35 RIs, and 15 PPOFs were performed. The mean follow-up was of 17.2 months (range: 12 to 36 months). The mean age at operation was 58.8 years (range: 17 to 83 years), and 89% of the patients were female.

Results The mean preoperative hallux valgus angle (HVA) and the IMA decreased from 21° to 10.2° and from 11.2° to 10.3° respectively in the DSTR-Akin. In the RI, the mean HVA decreased from 26.6° to 13.7°, and the IMA, from 11.2° to 10.3°; in the PCH, the mean HVA decreased from 31° to 14.5°, and the IMA decreased 14.9° to 10.7°; as for the PPOF, the mean HVA decreased from 39.2° to 17.7°, and the IMA, from 11.8° to 6.8°. The average ankle and hindfoot score of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) increased from 49.2 to 88.6. The rate of complications was of 11%.

Conclusion Our treatment protocol does not differ much from the classic ones, with similar results as well. We have as advantages less aggression to soft tissues and better cosmetic results. Level of Evidence: level IV, prospective case series.

Keywords

hallux valgus - metatarsal bones - minimally invasive surgical procedures

* Work developed at Hospital São Lucas, Santos, SP, Brazil.


Financial Support

There was no financial support from public, commercial, or non-profit sources.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 28. April 2020

Angenommen: 16. September 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
30. August 2021

© 2021. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 

  • Referências

  • 1 Isham SA. The Reverdin-Isham procedure for the correction of hallux abducto valgus. A distal metatarsal osteotomy procedure. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 1991; 8 (01) 81-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 De Prado M, Ripoll PL, Golano P. Hallux valgus. In: Percutaneous foot surgery. Barcelona: Masson; 2003: 57-94
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Bauer T, Biau D, Lortat-Jacob A, Hardy P. Percutaneous hallux valgus correction using the Reverdin-Isham osteotomy. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010; 96 (04) 407-416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Coughlin MJ. Hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78 (06) 932-966
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Coughlin MJ, Saltzman CL, Anderson RB. Mann's Surgery of the Foot and Ankle. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier/Saunders; 2014
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Rodrigues RC, Masiero C, Mizusaki JM. et al. Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot scale. Acta Ortop Bras 2008; 16 (02) 107-111
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Johnson KA, Cofield RH, Morrey BF. Chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979; (142) 44-47
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Akin O. The treatment of hallux valgus - a new operative procedure and its results. Med Sentinel 1925; 33: 678-683
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Vernois J. L'ostéotomie et chevron percutané du premier métatarsien. In: Cazeau C. ed. Chirurgie mini-invasive et percutanée du pied. Paris: Sauramps Médical; 2009: 97-104
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Ludloff K. Die beseitgung des hallux valgus Dirch die schrage plantodorsale osteotomei des metatarsalus I. Arch Klin Chir 1918; 110: 364-387
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Robinson AH, Limbers JP. Modern concepts in the treatment of hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87 (08) 1038-1045
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Trnka HJ. Osteotomies for hallux valgus correction. Foot Ankle Clin 2005; 10 (01) 15-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Vernois J, Redfern DJ. Percutaneous chevron: The union of classic stable fixed approach and percutaneous technique. Fuss & Sprunggelenk 2013; 11 (02) 70-75
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kayali C, Ozturk H, Agus H, Altay T, Hancerli O. The effectiveness of distal soft tissue procedures in hallux valgus. J Orthop Traumatol 2008; 9 (03) 117-121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Colloff B, Weitz EM. Proximal phalangeal osteotomy in hallux valgus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1967; 54 (54) 105-113
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Martínez-Nova A, Sánchez-Rodríguez R, Leal-Muro A, Sánchez-Barrado E, Pedrera-Zamorano JD. Percutaneous distal soft tissue release-akin procedure, clinical and podobarometric assessment with the BioFoot in-shoe system: a preliminary report. Foot Ankle Spec 2008; 1 (04) 222-230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Pansini JV, Matunaga RY, Aguiar A, Buchen EC. Clinical and radiographic analysis of hallux valgus treatment by distal Chevron osteotomy. Rev ABTPe 2008; 2 (01) 17-22
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Coull R, Stephens M. Operative decision making in hallux valgus. Curr Orthop 2002; 16 (03) 180-186
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Trnka HJ, Zembsch A, Wiesauer H, Hungerford M, Salzer M, Ritschl P. Modified Austin procedure for correction of hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int 1997; 18 (03) 119-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Basile A, Battaglia A, Campi A. Comparison of chevron-Akin osteotomy and distal soft tissue reconstruction-Akin osteotomy for correction of mild hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Surg 2000; 6 (03) 155-163
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Nery C, Barroco R, Réssio C. Biplanar chevron osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int 2002; 23 (09) 792-798
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Vernois J, Redfern DJ. Percutaneous Surgery for Severe Hallux Valgus. Foot Ankle Clin 2016; 21 (03) 479-493
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Marijuschkin I, Camargo AA, Diaz JL, Magalhães SL. Surgical treatment of mild and moderate hallux valgus by percutaneous Chevron technique. Tobillo Pie 2015; 7 (01) 21-28
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Lam P, Lee M, Xing J, Di Nallo M. Percutaneous Surgery for Mild to Moderate Hallux Valgus. Foot Ankle Clin 2016; 21 (03) 459-477
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Brogan K, Lindisfarne E, Akehurst H, Farook U, Shrier W, Palmer S. Minimally Invasive and Open Distal Chevron Osteotomy for Mild to Moderate Hallux Valgus. Foot Ankle Int 2016; 37 (11) 1197-1204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Saxena A, McCammon D. The Ludloff osteotomy: a critical analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg 1997; 36 (02) 100-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Lavigne C, Rasmont Q, Hoang B. Percutaneous double metatarsal osteotomy for hallux valgus correction of severe deformity. Acta Orthop Belg 2011; 77 (04) 516-521
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Mann RA, Rudicel S, Graves SC. Repair of hallux valgus with a distal soft-tissue procedure and proximal metatarsal osteotomy. A long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992; 74 (01) 124-129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Myerson MS. The Ludloff osteotomy. In: Joint Meeting of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society and the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot. Hawaii, November 13–15, 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Lara LC, Montesi Neto DJ, Guerra RR, Marques RF, Bicudo LR. Postoperative pain behavior of the hallux valgus using conventional, minimally invasive and percutaneous techniques. Rev ABTPe 2011; 5 (02) 81-86
    Google Scholar