Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Revista Urología Colombiana / Colombian Urology Journal 2020; 29(04): 202-208
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721331
Original Article | Artículo Original
Education/Educación

Análisis bibliométrico y de mapeo de la educación en cirugía laparoscópica y robótica en urología

Bibliometric Analysis of Education in Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery in Urology
Lynda Torres 
1   Médica Uróloga, Centro Policlínico Olaya, Bogotá, Colombia
,
Adriana Pedraza
2   Médica Uróloga, Clínica Desa, Cali, Colombia
,
Lisset Arroyo
3   Médica Uróloga, Hospital Simón Bolívar, Bogotá, Colombia
,
Melanie López de Mesa
4   Médica Uróloga, Hospital San José, Clínica de Marly, Bogotá, Colombia
,
Verónica Tobar
5   Médica Uróloga, Clínica Foscal, Bucaramanga, Colombia
,
Pamela Perdomo
6   Médica Uróloga, Clínica Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
,
Ana Maria Cárdenas
7   Médica Uróloga, Clínica Nueva El Lago, Bogotá, Colombia
,
Catalina Solano
8   Médica Uróloga, Uroclin, Medellín, Colombia
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Resumen

Objetivo Se realizó un análisis bibliométrico para conocer la situación actual de la educación en cirugía laparoscópica y robótica en urología.

Métodos La búsqueda fue realizada en la base de datos MEDLINE y EMBASE en marzo de 2020, a través del facilitador de búsqueda: FABUMED y PUBMED-PUBREMINER, utilizando los siguientes criterios (Laparoscopy OR robotics) AND (education urology) AND (1988:2019[dp])) y establecer los artículos disponibles respecto a educación en cirugía laparoscópica en urología. Adicionalmente se realizó un análisis de mapeo bibliométrico así como mapas de redes de colaboración.

Resultados Se obtuvieron 1383 revisiones en la literatura publicadas en 172 revistas. Las revistas con más publicaciones fueron: Journal of Endourology (167) y factor de impacto (FI) 2.26, BJU International (101, FI 4.52) Urology (90, FI 1.86) y Journal of Urology (71, FI 5.6). La producción total se dio en 49 países, los países con mayor número de publicaciones fueron Estados Unidos con 362 (26.1%) y Reino Unido 152 (10.9%), Latinoamérica estuvo encabezada por Brasil con 17 publicaciones.

Conclusiones El mayor número de publicaciones se observó a partir del 2006 years durante la última década ha estado liderado por Estados Unidos. En Colombia la investigación de educación en cirugía laparoscópica y robótica es mínima, posiblemente por carecer de programas de entrenamiento en los programas de residencia. Este análisis bibliométrico permite mostrar que la producción bibliográfica en esta área puede depender de que existan programas formales de entrenamiento que a futuro beneficien a toda la comunidad urológica.

Abstract

Objective A bibliomeric analysis was performed to know the current situation of education in laparoscopic and robotic surgery in Urology.

Methods The literature search was made using MEDLINE and EMBASE database on March 2020, we used de search facilitators FABUMED and PUBMED-PUBREMINER, we used the following criteria por the search (Laparoscopy OR robotics) AND (education urology) AND (1988: 2019 [dp])) and we obtained the articles available regarding education in laparoscopic surgery in urology. Additionally, a bibliometric mapping analysis was performed as well as collaboration network maps.

Results We found 1383 reviews in the literature published in 172 journals. The journals with most publications were: Journal of Endourology (167) and impact factor (FI) 2.26, BJU International (101, FI 4.52) Urology (90, FI 1.86) and Journal of Urology (71, FI 5.6). Overall production was in 49 countries, the countries with the highest number of publications were the United States with 362 (26.1%) and the United Kingdom 152 (10.9%), Latin America was led by Brazil with 17 publications.

Conclusions Most of publications was observed from 2006 and during the last decade it has been led by the United States. In Colombia, educational research in laparoscopic and robotic surgery is minimal, possibly due to the lack of training programs in residency programs. This bibliometric analysis shows that bibliographic production in this area may depend on the existence of formal training programs that will benefit the entire urological community in the future.

Palabras clave

bibliométrico - laparoscopia - educación - urología

Keywords

bibliometrics - laparoscopy - education - urology

Aspectos Éticos

De acuerdo a la Resolución 8430 del año 1993 (expedida por el Ministerio de Salud de Colombia), este estudio se encuentra en una categoría sin riesgo. Se tiene además en cuenta la normatividad internacional: la declaración de Helsinki y las pautas éticas para la investigación biomédica del Consejo de Organizaciones Internacionales de las Ciencias Médicas –CIOMS- y los parámetros establecidos por la Resolución 8430 de 1993 years Resolución 2378 de 2008.


El presente estudio es descriptivo y no se realizó ningún tipo de intervención, ni modificación intencionada de variables biológicas, fisiológicas, psicológicas o sociales de los datos. Se realizó la búsqueda en la literatura para la obtención de todos los datos.


Institucion en donde se llevó a cabo trabajo

Multi-institucional. Institución principal Uroclin.




Publication History

Received: 30 August 2020

Accepted: 27 October 2020

Article published online:
16 December 2020

© 2020. Sociedad Colombiana de Urología. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 

  • Referencias

  • 1 http://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/cbd/competence-by-design-cbd-e . Competence by Design. pp. 1–1 2016
    PubMed
  • 2 Frank JR, Snell LS, Cate OT. et al. Competency-based medical education: theory to practice. Med Teach 2010; 32 (08) 638-645
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Aggarwal R, Darzi A. Technical-skills training in the 21st century. N Engl J Med 2006; 355 (25) 2695-2696
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Satava RM. The revolution in medical education-the role of simulation. J Grad Med Educ 2009; 1 (02) 172-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Reznick RK, MacRae H. Teaching surgical skills--changes in the wind. N Engl J Med 2006; 355 (25) 2664-2669
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Krummel TM. Surgical simulation and virtual reality: the coming revolution. Ann Surg 1998; 228 (05) 635-637
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Torkington J, Smith SG, Rees BI, Darzi A. Skill transfer from virtual reality to a real laparoscopic task. Surg Endosc 2001; 15 (10) 1076-1079
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Andreatta PB, Woodrum DT, Birkmeyer JD. et al. Laparoscopic skills are improved with LapMentor training: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 2006; 243 (06) 854-860 , discussion 860–863
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Sedlack RE, Kolars JC. Computer simulator training enhances the competency of gastroenterology fellows at colonoscopy: results of a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99 (01) 33-37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 2004; 91 (02) 146-150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 McDougall EM. Validation of surgical simulators. J Endourol 2007; 21 (03) 244-247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Van Nortwick SS, Lendvay TS, Jensen AR, Wright AS, Horvath KD, Kim S. Methodologies for establishing validity in surgical simulation studies. Surgery 2010; 147 (05) 622-630
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Forster JA, Browning AJ, Paul AB, Biyani CS. Surgical simulators in urological training--views of UK Training Programme Directors. BJU Int 2012; 110 (06) 776-778
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Vassiliou MC, Dunkin BJ, Marks JM, Fried GM. FLS and FES: comprehensive models of training and assessment. Surg Clin North Am 2010; 90 (03) 535-558
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ahmed K, Amer T, Challacombe B, Jaye P, Dasgupta P, Khan MS. How to develop a simulation programme in urology. BJU Int 2011; 108 (11) 1698-1702
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Van Eck NJ, Waltman L, Dekker R, Van Den Berg J. A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: multidimensional scaling and VOS. J Am Soc Inform Sci Tech 2018
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Waltman L, van Eck NJ, Noyons ECM. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. 2010 http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.1032
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2010 61. 2405-2416
    PubMed
  • 19 Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, Revalidation [online]. http://www.aomrc.org.uk/introduction.html 2009
    PubMed
  • 20 Merkur S, Mossialos E, Long M, McKee M. Physician revalidation in Europe. Clin Med (Lond) 2008; 8 (04) 371-376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Schreuder HW, Oei G, Maas M, Borleffs JC, Schijven MP. Implementation of simulation in surgical practice: minimally invasive surgery has taken the lead: the Dutch experience. Med Teach 2011; 33 (02) 105-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Schreuder HW, Oei SG, Maas M. et al. Implementation of simulation for training minimally invasive surgery*. TS Medisch Onderwijs 2011; 30: 206-220 DOI: 10.1007/s12507-011-0051-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Rosenberg J. Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills. Am J Surg 2003; 185 (02) 146-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Gurusamy K, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 2008; 95 (09) 1088-1097 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6344.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Larsen CR, Soerensen JL, Grantcharov TP. et al. Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2009; 338: b1802 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b1802. Erratum in: BMJ. 2009;338. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2074
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 LeonFerrufino F, Varas CohenJ, Buckel SchaffnerE, Crovari EulufiF, Pimentel MullerF, Martınez CastilloJ. et al. Simulacion en cirugıa laparoscopica. Cir Esp 2015; 93: 4-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Lahanas V, Georgiou E, Loukas C. 2016. Surgical Simulation Training Systems: Box Trainers, Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality Simula.
    Google Scholar