Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2021; 15(02): 266-272
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721294
Original Article

Evaluation of Panoramic Radiographs in Relation to the Mandibular Third Molar and to Incidental Findings in an Adult Population

Josefine Cederhag
1   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
,
Nina Lundegren
2   Department of Oral Diagnostics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
,
Per Alstergren
3   Department of Orofacial Pain and Jaw Function, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
4   Specialized Pain Rehabilitation, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
,
Xie-Qi Shi
1   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
5   Section of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
,
Kristina Hellén-Halme
1   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives The aim was to evaluate the characteristics of the mandibular third molars, especially in relation to the inferior alveolar nerve. Further aims were to investigate incidental findings in panoramic radiographs in an adult population, and to investigate image quality related to patient positioning.

Materials and Methods From a previous study with 451 randomly selected adult participants who lived in Sweden, 442 panoramic radiographs from four dental public health clinics were used. The third molars’ characteristics and relation to inferior alveolar nerve were evaluated. Incidental findings and patient positioning were recorded.

Statistical Analysis Frequency analysis was used to investigate the occurrence of all findings and their possible interconnections. Whether the patients’ age or gender had an impact or not was also analyzed.

Results The third molars were erupted in vertical position among 73% regardless of age. When retained or semi-retained, they were most commonly in mesioangular positions. The inferior alveolar nerve was located inferior to the roots in 52%, whereas an overlapped position was most common if the third molar was retained (90%), semi-retained (83%) or the age was less than 30 years (66%). Common incidental findings were apical radiolucencies, idiopathic osteosclerosis, and tooth fragments. Suboptimal patient positioning was found in one-third of the radiographs.

Conclusions Panoramic radiography is a useful method to evaluate third molar prior to surgical removal and may be the only image required. Most incidental findings on panoramic radiographs does not seem to require any further odontological management.

Keywords

third molar - panoramic radiography - incidental findings - adult


Publication History

Article published online:
26 December 2020

© 2020. European Journal of Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Rondon RH, Pereira YC, do Nascimento GC. Common positioning errors in panoramic radiography: a review. Imaging Sci Dent 2014; 44 (01) 1-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Gross H, Nilsson M, Hellén-Halme K. Detectability of normal anatomy in digital panoramic radiographs. Swed Dent J 2014; 38 (04) 179-185
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Dhillon M, Raju SM, Verma S. et al. Positioning errors and quality assessment in panoramic radiography. Imaging Sci Dent 2012; 42 (04) 207-212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Huang CK, Lui MT, Cheng DH. Use of panoramic radiography to predict postsurgical sensory impairment following extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. J Chin Med Assoc 2015; 78 (10) 617-622
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Atieh MA. Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography in determining relationship between inferior alveolar nerve and mandibular third molar. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68 (01) 74-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bell GW, Rodgers JM, Grime RJ. et al. The accuracy of dental panoramic tomographs in determining the root morphology of mandibular third molar teeth before surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 95 (01) 119-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Coulthard P, Bailey E, Esposito M, Furness S, Renton TF, Worthington HV. Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (07) CD004345
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Cheung LK, Leung YY, Chow LK, Wong MC, Chan EK, Fok YH. Incidence of neurosensory deficits and recovery after lower third molar surgery: a prospective clinical study of 4338 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 39 (04) 320-326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Korkmaz YT, Kayıpmaz S, Senel FC, Atasoy KT, Gumrukcu Z. Does additional cone beam computed tomography decrease the risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury in high-risk cases undergoing third molar surgery? Does CBCT decrease the risk of IAN injury?. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 46 (05) 628-635
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 European Commission Radiation Protection N° 172 Cone Beam CT for Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. Evidence-Based Guidelines. Directorate-General for Energy, Directorate D—Nuclear Energy, Unit D4—Radiation Protection; 2012:1681–6803. Available at: Available at: http://www.sedentexct.eu/files/radiation_protection_172.pdf. Accessed June 30, 2020
  • 11 Bell GW. Use of dental panoramic tomographs to predict the relation between mandibular third molar teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve. Radiological and surgical findings, and clinical outcome. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 42 (01) 21-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Petersen LB, Olsen KR, Christensen J, Wenzel A. Image and surgery-related costs comparing cone beam CT and panoramic imaging before removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014; 43 (06) 20140001
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Rushton VE, Horner K. The use of panoramic radiology in dental practice. J Dent 1996; 24 (03) 185-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bekiroglu N, Mete S, Ozbay G, Yalcinkaya S, Kargul B. Evaluation of panoramic radiographs taken from 1,056 Turkish children. Niger J Clin Pract 2015; 18 (01) 8-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Asaumi JI, Hisatomi M, Yanagi Y. et al. Evaluation of panoramic radiographs taken at the initial visit at a department of paediatric dentistry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37 (06) 340-343
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bondemark L, Jeppsson M, Lindh-Ingildsen L, Rangne K. Incidental findings of pathology and abnormality in pretreatment orthodontic panoramic radiographs. Angle Orthod 2006; 76 (01) 98-102
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Yonetsu K, Yuasa K, Kanda S. Idiopathic osteosclerosis of the jaws: panoramic radiographic and computed tomographic findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997; 83 (04) 517-521
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Chala S, Abouqal R, Abdallaoui F. Prevalence of apical periodontitis and factors associated with the periradicular status. Acta Odontol Scand 2011; 69 (06) 355-359
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lundegren N, Axtelius B, Akerman S. Oral health in the adult population of Skåne, Sweden: a clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 2012; 70 (06) 511-519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 MacDonald D, Yu W. Incidental findings in a consecutive series of digital panoramic radiographs. Imaging Sci Dent 2020; 50 (01) 53-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 ICRP. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007; 37 (2-4) 1-332
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 DICOM. Digital Imaging and Communication in medicine. DICOM Grayscale Standard Display Function; 2011. Available at: http://medical.nema.org. Accessed June 30, 2020
  • 23 Hellén-Halme K, Petersson A, Warfvinge G, Nilsson M. Effect of ambient light and monitor brightness and contrast settings on the detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37 (07) 380-384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). Task Group 18. Assessment of Display Performance for Medical Imaging Systems. 2006 (updated July 23, 2018). Available at: http://deckard.mc.duke.edu/~samei/samei_tg18/index.html. Accessed June 30, 2020
  • 25 Statistics Sweden (Statistiska centralbyrån). Statistical database. Available at: http://www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se/pxweb/en/ssd/. Accessed June 30, 2020
  • 26 Akesson L. Panoramic radiography in the assessment of the marginal bone level. Swed Dent J Suppl 1991; 78: 1-129
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Suominen-Taipale LNA, Vehkalahti M, Aromaa A. Oral Health in the Finnish Adult Population: Health 2000 Survey. National Public Health Institute; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 28 von Wowern N, Nielsen HO. The fate of impacted lower third molars after the age of 20. A four-year clinical follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989; 18 (05) 277-280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kruger E, Thomson WM, Konthasinghe P. Third molar outcomes from age 18 to 26: findings from a population-based New Zealand longitudinal study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 92 (02) 150-155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Ventä I. Predictive model for impaction of lower third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 76 (06) 699-703
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Knutsson K, Brehmer B, Lysell L, Rohlin M. Pathoses associated with mandibular third molars subjected to removal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 82 (01) 10-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Ryalat S, AlRyalat SA, Kassob Z, Hassona Y, Al-Shayyab MH, Sawair F. Impaction of lower third molars and their association with age: radiological perspectives. BMC Oral Health 2018; 18 (01) 58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Quek SL, Tay CK, Tay KH, Toh SL, Lim KC. Pattern of third molar impaction in a Singapore Chinese population: a retrospective radiographic survey. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 32 (05) 548-552
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Miloro M, DaBell J. Radiographic proximity of the mandibular third molar to the inferior alveolar canal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 100 (05) 545-549
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Kamrun N, Tetsumura A, Nomura Y. et al. Visualization of the superior and inferior borders of the mandibular canal: a comparative study using digital panoramic radiographs and cross-sectional computed tomography images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 115 (04) 550-557
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Angelopoulos C, Thomas SL, Hechler S, Parissis N, Hlavacek M. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66 (10) 2130-2135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Ventä I, Vehkalahti MM, Suominen AL. What kind of third molars are disease-free in a population aged 30 to 93 years?. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 23 (03) 1015-1022
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 The National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen). Statistik om tandhälsa 2018; 2019. Available at: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/statistik-och-data/statistik/statistikamnen/tandhalsa/. Accessed June 30, 2020
  • 39 Rushton VE, Horner K, Worthington HV. The quality of panoramic radiographs in a sample of general dental practices. Br Dent J 1999; 186 (12) 630-633
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Ekströmer K, Hjalmarsson L. Positioning errors in panoramic images in general dentistry in Sörmland County, Sweden. Swed Dent J 2014; 38 (01) 31-38
    PubMedGoogle Scholar