Thromb Haemost 2021; 121(05): 690-693
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721147
Letter to the Editor

Effects of Continuous Plasma-Derived Subcutaneous C1-Esterase Inhibitor on Coagulation and Fibrinolytic Parameters

1  Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Angioedema, Barzilai Medical Center, Ashkelon, Israel
Donald Levy
2  Division of Basic and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of California at Irvine, Orange, California, United States
Hilary Longhurst
3  Department of Immunology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge and UCLH, London, United Kingdom
Marco Cicardi
4  Ospedale Luigi Sacco/U.O. Medicina Generale, Milano, Italy
Timothy Craig
5  Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Research, Department of Medicine and Pediatrics, Penn State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
Paul K. Keith
6  Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Annette Feussner
7  CSL Behring GmbH, Marburg, Germany
Henrike Feuersenger
7  CSL Behring GmbH, Marburg, Germany
Thomas Machnig
8  CSL Behring GmbH, Marburg, Germany (former employee)
Subhransu Prusty
7  CSL Behring GmbH, Marburg, Germany
Ingo Pragst
7  CSL Behring GmbH, Marburg, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Funding This work was funded by CSL Behring. Medical writing and editorial support were provided by Luis Araujo and Bhawna Basin of Trilogy Writing & Consulting GmbH.

Replacement therapy with a plasma-derived subcutaneous C1-esterase inhibitor (pdC1-INH[SC]) has been approved for prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks.[1] [2] Since high levels of coagulation and fibrinolysis-related proteins have been previously reported in HAE,[3] [4] [5] [6] we sought to evaluate the effects of the prophylactic treatment on measurable laboratory parameters. Twice weekly pdC1-INH(SC) 40 or 60 IU/kg doses were administered in two clinical studies: phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial (COMPACT) and Open-Label Extension (OLE) study.[1] [2] Continuous supplementation of pdC1-INH(SC) was found to be safe and effective in reducing attacks of HAE, while no related thromboembolic events were reported. Detailed design and results of both trials have been previously published.[1] [2] We report an analysis of plasma coagulation and fibrinolytic parameters recorded during prescheduled visits in both trials.

Analyses were done using standard laboratory methods performed by a central laboratory. Descriptive statistics were used (safety population was analyzed). No sample size calculation or statistical testing was performed for the coagulation endpoints.

We present here results for the Food and Drug Administration-approved pdC1-INH(SC) 60 IU/kg dose (HAEGARDA [United States and Canada] and Berinert SC [European Union and Australia]; CSL Behring) and placebo groups combined. Detailed demographics were previously published.[1] [2] Of the 90 patients in COMPACT, 60 (66.7%) were females and the mean (standard deviation) age was 39.6 (14.9) years. Of the 126 patients in OLE, 76 (60.3%) were females and the mean age was 40.5 (15.6) years. In both trials there were no notable differences in gender, race, and body mass index between pdC1-INH(SC) and placebo.

Although median values of all coagulation parameters remained within reference values at all time points assessed in both groups, median D-dimer (DD) and prothrombin fragments 1 + 2 (PF1 + 2) in pdC1-INH(SC)-treated patients decreased from baseline throughout the study and up to week 14 during the COMPACT trial. Similar levels of DD and PF1 + 2 were observed during the OLE trial, which remained stable ([Fig. 1]). Such a trend was not observed in HAE patients receiving placebo. The median DD change (25th, 75th percentile) from baseline to week 14 was −120.0 (−920.0, −10.0) ng/mL for pdC1-INH(SC) and 100.0 (−20.0, 740.0) ng/mL for placebo. The median PF1 + 2 change from baseline to week 14 was −52.5 (−148.0, −19.0) pmol/L for pdC1-INH(SC) and 28.0 (−30.0, 192.0) pmol/L for placebo. Extreme DD and PF1 + 2 levels were recorded during both trials. However, no consequential-related thrombotic or thromboembolic events were reported during the studies. Activated partial thromboplastin time levels were higher in treated patients but remained stable throughout both trials ([Fig. 1]). No clinically relevant differences between pdC1-INH(SC)-treated and placebo-treated patients were observed over time for fibrinogen ([Fig. 1]), prothrombin international normalized ratio (data not shown), and plasmin–α2-antiplasmin complexes (data not shown), and these values were generally stable over time.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Median D-dimer, PF1 + 2, aPTT, and fibrinogen levels (safety population). Notes: baseline values are for both COMPACT study and OLE (all patients prior C1-INH[SC] administration). Red dotted lines represent normal laboratory range. EOS visit also includes values from the week 53 visit. aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; EOS, end of study; N, number of patients; OLE, open-label extension; pdC1-INH(SC), plasma-derived subcutaneous C1-esterase inhibitor; PF1 + 2, prothrombin fragments 1 + 2; Q1, first quartile (25th percentile); Q3, third quartile (75th percentile).

C1-INH is a key inhibitor of the coagulation and fibrinolysis in HAE.[6] [7] [8] In its absence both the contact system (CS) and the kallikrein–kinin system (KKS) are mobilized into overproduction of the vasoactive substance bradykinin—the main mediator of hyperpermeability and tissue edema ([Fig. 2]). An increase in coagulation and fibrinolytic activity has been previously demonstrated in patients during attacks.[3] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] Remarkably, there is no evidence of increased thrombotic events in HAE patients, neither during the activated state (attacks) nor in remission.[11] [12] One explanation is that generation of plasmin and mobilization of the fibrinolytic cascade may counterbalance clot formation.[17] Additionally, it was shown that factor XII-dependent KKS may be activated without activating the factor XI-dependent intrinsic coagulation cascade,[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] which may explain why the extent of thrombin generation during an attack is mild and self-limiting.[9] Another explanation is that unlike the CS, which depends on factor XII autoactivation, the KKS may be activated in a factor XII-independent (contactless) manner on endothelial surfaces.[14] [15]

Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Mechanism of action of C1-esterase inhibitor (C1-INH). In the absence/deficiency of the regulatory serine-protease inhibitor C1-INH, the contact activation system and the kallikrein–kinin system are activated by proteases associated with the vessel-wall endothelium. As a result, PK (complexed with HK) is converted to the proteolytic enzyme PKa, which cleaves HK and liberates the vasoactive nonapeptide BK.[8] Factor XIIa initiates the intrinsic cascade of coagulation, leading to fibrin formation.[7] The role of the fibrinolytic system in hereditary angioedema was only recently highlighted. Evidently, both BK and PKa induce zymogenic plasminogen activators tPA and uPA, which trigger the fibrinolytic system, dissolve stabilized fibrin lattices, and release PF1 + 2 and D-dimer into the circulation.[6] [7] [8] BK, bradykinin; C1-INH, C1-esterase inhibitor; HK, high-molecular kininogen; HSP90, heat-shock protein 90; PF1 + 2, prothrombin fragments 1 + 2; PK, plasma prekallikrein; PKa, plasma kallikrein; tPA, tissue-type plasminogen activator; uPA, urokinase-type plasminogen activator.

We previously reported significantly elevated DD levels in HAE patients who experienced attacks with submucosal involvement.[12] This may suggest that DD forming mechanisms may differ between tissues and could reflect differences in endothelial involvement. Since production of DD depends on broken-down insoluble cross-linked fibrin clots, it is still unclear where the high levels of fibrin seen during HAE attacks are originated.

We propose that in C1-INH-deficient patients the potential prothrombotic propensity is counterbalanced by increased fibrinolysis, manifested by high DD and PF1 + 2 plasma levels. Patients in COMPACT and OLE trials had frequent attacks and showed high DD and PF1 + 2 at baseline and during placebo treatment. DD levels are used in clinical practice to categorize venous thromboembolism into highly or moderately sensitive diagnostic criteria.[18] Very little is known about the significance of DD levels in chronic undulating diseases like HAE. Although still within the defined reference levels for thromboembolic risk, the study shows that these levels were attenuated during pdC1-INH(SC) continuous supplementation, which suggests that vascular homeostasis was restored.

Plasma coagulation and fibrinolysis differ in their plasma half-life (DD: 3–6 hours; PF1 + 2: 1.5 hours)[19]; therefore, their detection is dependent on the evaluation timing. This analysis carries this inherent limitation, since laboratory parameters were measured only during preset time points (patient visits), which does not allow comparing clinical attacks to remissions. However, the HAE patients included in both studies were considered highly active (having ≥4 clinically significant attacks over a 2-month period before starting study treatment),[1] [2] which together with the proven effectiveness of the treatment underscores the relevance of the presented coagulation/fibrinolysis data.

Our results corroborate previous observations that C1-INH-treated HAE patients show lower DD levels[11] [12] and that the transient elevation in coagulation parameters has not been associated with thromboembolic risk. Moreover, a comprehensive review confirmed pdC1-INH's safety regarding thromboembolic events.[12] Thus, while C1-INH deficiency causes increased levels of coagulation factors, C1-INH prophylaxis may contribute to better system stability.

The clinical significance of these observations is yet unclear. Currently no laboratory marker has been accepted as a reliable predictor of HAE activity,[16] [20] although cleaved high-molecular kininogen has been proposed in some publications.[20] [21] Therefore, further research is warranted to explore the potential of DD and PF1 + 2 as HAE biomarkers. Our analysis supports DD as a surrogate marker for modification in disease activity achieved by prophylactic C1-INH supplementation.

Co-author Marco Cicardi passed away on August 11, 2019 at the time of reviewing this communication. Number

NCT01912456 (COMPACT) and NCT02316353 (OLE).

Authors' Contributions

H.L., M.C., and T.C. were investigators in the COMPACT trial contributing to data generation. A.R., D.L., P.K.K., A.F., H.F., T.M., S.P., and I.P. reviewed and critically revised this communication. H.F. also provided statistical support. All authors approved the final version of this communication.

Publication History

Received: 31 March 2020

Accepted: 15 October 2020

Publication Date:
17 November 2020 (online)

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany