Triazole-Extended Anthracenes as Optical Force Probes

Christoph Baumann; Robert Göstl

doi:10.1055/s-0040-1720924

Synlett, Table of Contents

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Synlett 2022; 33(09): 875-878
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1720924

cluster

Mechanochemistry

Triazole-Extended Anthracenes as Optical Force Probes

Authors

Christoph Baumann

^aDWI – Leibniz Institute for Interactive Materials, Forckenbeckstr. 50, 52056 Aachen, Germany

^bInstitute of Technical and Macromolecular Chemistry, RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 1, 52074 Aachen, Germany
Robert Göstl ∗

^aDWI – Leibniz Institute for Interactive Materials, Forckenbeckstr. 50, 52056 Aachen, Germany

Abstract

All articles of this category

Abstract

Optical force probes (OFPs) are force-responsive molecules that report on mechanically induced transformations by the alteration of their optical properties. Yet, their modular design and incorporation into polymer architectures at desired positions is challenging. Here we report triazole-extended anthracene OFPs that combine two modular ‘click’ reactions in their synthesis potentially allowing their incorporation at desirable positions in complex polymer materials. Importantly, these retain the excellent optical properties of their parent 9-π-extended anthracene OFP counterparts.

Key words

mechanochemistry - fluorescence - polymers - cycloaddition - chromophores

Full Text

References

References and Notes
1 O’Neill RT, Boulatov R. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2021; 5: 148
2 Chen Y, Mellot G, van Luijk D, Creton C, Sijbesma RP. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021; 50: 4100
3 Yuan Y, Yuan W, Chen Y. Sci. China Mater. 2016; 59: 507
4 Göstl, R.; Clough, J. M.; Sijbesma, R. P. In Mechanochemistry in Materials Craig S. L.; Royal Society of Chemistry, London, 2017; 53.
5 Traeger H, Kiebala DJ, Weder C, Schrettl S. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2021; 42: 2000573
6 Davis DA, Hamilton A, Yang J, Cremar LD, Van Gough D, Potisek SL, Ong MT, Braun PV, Martínez TJ, White SR, Moore JS, Sottos NR. Nature 2009; 459: 68
7 Li J, Nagamani C, Moore JS. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015; 48: 2181
8 Chen Y, Spiering AJ. H, Karthikeyan S, Peters GW. M, Meijer EW, Sijbesma RP. Nat. Chem. 2012; 4: 559
9 Ducrot E, Chen Y, Bulters M, Sijbesma RP, Creton C. Science 2014; 344: 186
10 Imato K, Irie A, Kosuge T, Ohishi T, Nishihara M, Takahara A, Otsuka H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 6168
11 Kosuge T, Zhu X, Lau VM, Aoki D, Martinez TJ, Moore JS, Otsuka H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019; 141: 1898
12 Kato S, Furukawa S, Aoki D, Goseki R, Oikawa K, Tsuchiya K, Shimada N, Maruyama A, Numata K, Otsuka H. Nat. Commun. 2021; 12: 126
13 Löwe C, Weder C. Adv. Mater. 2002; 14: 1625
14 Traeger H, Sagara Y, Kiebala DJ, Schrettl S, Weder C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021; 60: 16191
15 Sagara Y, Traeger H, Li J, Okado Y, Schrettl S, Tamaoki N, Weder C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021; 143: 5519
16 Konda SS. M, Brantley JN, Varghese BT, Wiggins KM, Bielawski CW, Makarov DE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 12722
17 Li J, Shiraki T, Hu B, Wright RA. E, Zhao B, Moore JS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136: 15925
18 Noh J, Peterson GI, Choi T.-L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021; 60: 18651
19 Göstl R, Sijbesma RP. Chem. Sci. 2016; 7: 370
20 Yildiz D, Baumann C, Mikosch A, Kuehne AJ. C, Herrmann A, Göstl R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 12919
21 Baumann C, Stratigaki M, Centeno SP, Göstl R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021; 60: 13287
22 Izak-Nau E, Demco DE, Braun S, Baumann C, Pich A, Göstl R. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2020; 2: 1682
23 Willis-Fox N, Rognin E, Baumann C, Aljohani TA, Göstl R, Daly R. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020; 30: 2002372
24 Stratigaki M, Baumann C, van Breemen LC. A, Heuts JP. A, Sijbesma RP, Göstl R. Polym. Chem. 2020; 11: 358
25 Slootman J, Waltz V, Yeh CJ, Baumann C, Göstl R, Comtet J, Creton C. Phys. Rev. X 2020; 10: 041045
26 Morelle XP, Sanoja GE, Castagnet S, Creton C. Soft Matter 2021; 17: 4266
27 Dubach FF. C, Ellenbroek WG, Storm C. J. Polym. Sci. 2021; 59: 1188
28 Daniele MA, Bandera YP, Foulger SH. Photochem. Photobiol. 2012; 88: 129
29 Synthesis of OFP diol 2 Mechanophore precursor 1 (549 mg, 1.6 mmol, 1.00 equiv) and 3-azido-1-propanol (155 μL, 1.68 mmol, 1.05 equiv) were dissolved in a mixture of THF (20 mL) and water (6 mL). Sodium l-ascorbate (317 mg, 1.6 mmol, 1.00 equiv) was added, followed by Cu^IISO₄·5H₂O (40 mg, 0.16 mmol, 0.100 equiv). The heterogeneous mixture was stirred vigorously at rt overnight and was afterwards diluted with water (50 mL). THF was removed in vacuo, and the white precipitate was cooled in an ice bath before collection by filtration. After washing the precipitate with cold water (2 ( 25 mL), it was dried in vacuo to yield the triazole mechanophore diol 2 (70% yield) as white solid. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d ₆): δ = 8.54 (s, 1 H), 7.52 (dd, J = 7.4, 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.41 (dd, J = 6.8, 1.9 Hz, 1 H), 7.30 (dd, J = 6.5, 2.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.18 (qt, J = 5.6, 2.6 Hz, 3 H), 7.04 (td, J = 7.6, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 6.26 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 4.85 (d, J = 3.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.75 (t, J = 5.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.63 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 4.59 (t, J = 5.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.90 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.53 (dt, J = 7.6, 6.0 Hz, 2 H), 3.38 (dd, J = 8.3, 3.1 Hz, 1 H), 2.95 (ddt, J = 13.0, 9.2, 4.7 Hz, 2 H), 2.64–2.41 (m, 2 H), 2.12 (p, J = 6.7 Hz, 2 H); see Figure S1. ¹³C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d ₆): δ = 175.94, 174.94, 144.29, 143.10, 141.00, 139.27, 138.42, 126.58, 126.56, 126.17, 126.15, 125.93, 124.82, 124.30, 123.80, 123.67, 57.49, 56.34, 49.23, 48.09, 47.50, 46.76, 44.89, 33.10; see Figure S2. ESI⁺ HRMS: m/z [MH⁺] calcd: 445.1870; found: 445.1942; see Figure S3.
30 Cravotto G, Gaudino EC, Cintas P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013; 42: 7521
31 Dawson WR, Windsor MW. J. Phys. Chem. 1968; 72: 3251
32 Ast S, Fischer T, Müller H, Mickler W, Schwichtenberg M, Rurack K, Holdt H.-J. Chem. Eur. J. 2013; 19: 2990
33 Stevenson R, De Bo G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017; 139: 16768
34 Sato T, Nalepa DE. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1978; 22: 865
35 Kryger MJ, Munaretto AM, Moore JS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 18992
36 Stauch T, Dreuw A. Chem. Sci. 2017; 8: 5567
37 Jacobs MJ, Schneider G, Blank KG. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 2899

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information (PDF)