PDF herunterladen
J Am Acad Audiol 2021; 32(01): 027-034
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1719137
Research Article

The Accuracy of Smartphone Sound Level Meter Applications (SLMAs) in Measuring Sound Levels in Clinical Rooms

Yula C. Serpanos
1   Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Adelphi University, Garden City, New York
2   Long Island Doctor of Audiology (AuD) Consortium, Garden City, New York
,
Janet R. Schoepflin
1   Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Adelphi University, Garden City, New York
2   Long Island Doctor of Audiology (AuD) Consortium, Garden City, New York
,
Steven R. Cox
1   Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Adelphi University, Garden City, New York
,
Diane Davis
1   Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Adelphi University, Garden City, New York
2   Long Island Doctor of Audiology (AuD) Consortium, Garden City, New York
› Institutsangaben Funding No funding was received.
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background The accuracy of smartphone sound level meter applications (SLMAs) has been investigated with varied results, based on differences in platform, device, app, available features, test stimuli, and methodology.

Purpose This article determines the accuracy of smartphone SLMAs with and without calibration of external and internal microphones for measuring sound levels in clinical rooms.

Research Design Quasi-experimental research design comparing the accuracy of two smartphone SLMAs with and without calibration of external and internal microphones.

Data Collection and Analysis Two iOS-based smartphone SLMAs (NIOSH SLM and SPL Meter) on an iPhone 6S were used with and without calibrated external and internal microphones. Measures included: (1) white noise (WN) stimuli from 20 to 100 dB sound pressure level in a sound-treated test booth and (2) sound levels in quiet in four nonsound-treated clinical rooms and in simulated background sound conditions using music at 45, 55, and 80 dBA. Chi-square analysis was used to determine a significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) in sound measures between the SLMAs and a Type 1 SLM.

Results Measures of WN signals and room sound level measures in quiet and simulated background sound conditions were significantly more accurate at levels ≥ 40 dBA using the SLMAs with calibrated external and internal microphones. However, SLMA measures with and without calibration of external and internal microphones overestimated sound levels < 40 dBA.

Conclusion The SLMAs studied with calibrated external or internal microphones are able to verify the room environment for audiologic screening at 1,000, 2,000, and 4,000 Hz at 20 dB hearing level (American Academy of Audiology and American Speech-Language-Hearing Association) using supra-aural earphones (American National Standards Institute S3.1–1999 [R2018]). However, the tested SLMAs overestimated low-level sound < 40 dBA, even when the external or internal microphones were calibrated. Clinicians are advised to calibrate the microphones prior to using measurement systems involving smartphones and SLMAs to measure room sound levels and to monitor background noise levels throughout the provision of clinical services.

Keywords

sound levels - calibration - smartphone - sound level meter - sound level meter applications


Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 18. Februar 2020

Angenommen: 02. Juli 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
14. Januar 2021

© 2021. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Beattie RC. Word recognition functions for the CID W-22 test in multitalker noise for normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. J Speech Hear Disord 1989; 54 (01) 20-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Dubno JR, Dirks DD, Morgan DE. Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1984; 76 (01) 87-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 McArdle RA, Wilson RH, Burks CA. Speech recognition in multitalker babble using digits, words, and sentences. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16 (09) 726-739 , quiz 763–764 DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.16.9.9.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Wilson RH. Development of a speech-in-multitalker-babble paradigm to assess word-recognition performance. J Am Acad Audiol 2003; 14 (09) 453-470
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 American National Standards Institute. Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms (Rev. ed.; ANSI S3.1–1999). New York, NY: Author; 2018
    Google Scholar
  • 6 American Academy of Audiology. Childhood Hearing Screening Guidelines. 2011 . Accessed October 27, 2020 at: https://audiologyweb.s3.amazonaws.com/migrated/ChildhoodScreeningGuidelines.pdf_5399751c9ec216.42663963.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Childhood Hearing Screening. n.d. Accessed September 2, 2020 at: https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/professional-issues/childhood-hearing-screening/
    Google Scholar
  • 8 American National Standards Institute. Acoustical Performance Criteria, Design Requirements, and Guidelines for Schools, Part 1: Permanent Schools (S12.60.2010/Part 1). New York, NY: Author; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Celestina M, Hrovat J, Kardous CA. Smartphone-based sound level measurement apps: evaluation of compliance with international sound level meter standards. Appl Acoust 2018; 139: 119-128
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kardous CA, Shaw PB. Evaluation of smartphone sound measurement applications. J Acoust Soc Am 2014; 135 (04) EL186-EL192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kardous CA, Shaw PB. Evaluation of smartphone sound measurement applications (apps) using external microphones-a follow-up study. J Acoust Soc Am 2016; 140 (04) EL327-EL333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Keene K, Merovitz A, Irvine E. et al. Accuracy of smartphone sound level meter applications. Canad Hear Rep 2013; 8: 24-28
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Murphy E, King EA. Testing the accuracy of smartphones and sound level meter applications for measuring environmental noise. Appl Acoust 2016; 106: 16-22
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Nast DR, Speer WS, Le Prell CG. Sound level measurements using smartphone “apps”: useful or inaccurate?. Noise Health 2014; 16 (72) 251-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Roberts B, Kardous C, Neitzel R. Improving the accuracy of smart devices to measure noise exposure. J Occup Environ Hyg 2016; 13 (11) 840-846
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Robinson D, Tingay J. Comparative study of the performance of smartphone-based sound level meter apps, with and without the application of a 1 2 ″IEC-61094–4 working standard microphone, to IEC-61672 standard metering equipment in the detection of various problematic workplace noise environments. In Proceedings of the Inter Noise Conference. 2014, November. Accessed September 2, 2020 at: https://www.acoustics.asn.au/conference_proceedings/INTERNOISE2014/papers/p565.pdf
    Google Scholar
  • 17 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH Sound Level Meter App. 2019. Accessed September 2, 2020 at: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/noise/app.html
    Google Scholar
  • 18 International Electrotechnical Commission. Electroacoustics Sound Level Meters, Part 3: Periodic Tests, Standard (IEC 61672–3). Geneva, Switzerland: Author; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Fava G, Oliveira G, Baglione M, Pimpinella M, Spitzer JB. The use of sound level meter apps in the clinical setting. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2016; 25 (01) 14-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Serpanos YC, Renne B, Schoepflin JR, Davis D. The accuracy of smartphone sound level meter applications with and without calibration. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2018; 27 (04) 1319-1328
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 American National Standards Institute. Measurement of Sound Pressure Levels in Air (Rev. ed.; ANSI S1.13–2005). New York: Author; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 22 American National Standards Institute. Sound Level Meters - Part 1: Specifications (A Nationally Adopted International Standard) (ANSI S1.4/Part1). New York, NY: Author; 2014
    Google Scholar