J Am Acad Audiol 2020; 31(10): 740-745
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1719132
Research Article

Music Listening Habits and Music Perception Abilities of Prelingually Deafened Adolescent Cochlear Implant Recipients

Mustafa Yüksel
1   Audiology and Speech Disorders Program, Institute of Health Sciences, Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey
2   Department of Speech and Language Therapy, School of Health Sciences, Ankara Medipol University, Ankara, Turkey
,
Atılım Atılgan
3   Audiology Department, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
,
Ayça Çiprut
3   Audiology Department, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Music is a very important art form that can evoke strong emotions and involvement with it can have a considerable impact on cochlear implant (CI) recipients' quality of life. It is well known that music perception is limited in CI with fully electric hearing and CI recipients have significantly poorer music-appraisal ability when compared with normal hearing subjects. Considering the importance of music on the life of an adolescent and negative impact of hearing loss on mental health, understanding and improving music listening habits and perception abilities can have a positive impact on the mental health of CI user adolescents.

Purpose This study aims to evaluate music listening habits and music perception abilities of prelingually deafened adolescent CI users to reveal the relationship between self-reported assessment and psychophysical measurement.

Research Design The psychophysical measures of music perception and self-reported music listening habits of adolescent CI users were obtained.

Study Sample Twenty-nine prelingually deafened adolescent CI users were evaluated in this study.

Data Collection and Analysis The Turkish Clinical Assessment of Music Perception (T-CAMP) test was used to evaluate music perception abilities. These abilities were evaluated with a three-item questionnaire assessing enjoyment of music, listening habits, and comprehension of lyrics. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the relationship between the T-CAMP subtests and questionnaire items.

Results Statistically significant correlations were observed between the melody-recognition subtest of T-CAMP and all three questionnaire items. The correlation between the enjoyment and rate items on the questionnaire was also statistically significant.

Conclusion The present study shows that adolescent CI users also enjoy and listen to music in ways similar to postlingually deafened adult CI users. It also demonstrates that melody-recognition abilities have a significant relationship with music enjoyment and listening habits in prelingually deafened adolescent CI users.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.




Publication History

Received: 20 January 2020

Accepted: 10 April 2020

Article published online:
15 December 2020

© 2021. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Juslin PN, Liljeström S, Västfjäll D, Lundqvist L-O. How does music evoke emotions?. Exploring the underlying mechanisms. In: Juslin PN, Sloboda JA, eds. Series in Affective Science. Handbook of Music and Emotion: Theory, Research, Applications. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2010:605–642
  • 2 Lassaletta L, Castro A, Bastarrica M. et al. Does music perception have an impact on quality of life following cochlear implantation?. Acta Otolaryngol 2007; 127 (07) 682-686
  • 3 Gfeller K, Lansing CR. Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34 (04) 916-920
  • 4 Leal MC, Shin YJ, Laborde M-L. et al. Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngol 2003; 123 (07) 826-835
  • 5 Drennan WR, Rubinstein JT. Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008; 45 (05) 779-789
  • 6 Nimmons GL, Kang RS, Drennan WR. et al. Clinical Assessment of Music Perception in cochlear implant listeners. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29 (02) 149-155
  • 7 Won JH, Drennan WR, Kang RS, Rubinstein JT. Psychoacoustic abilities associated with music perception in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 2010; 31 (06) 796-805
  • 8 Gfeller K, Knutson JF, Woodworth G, Witt S, DeBus B. Timbral recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults. J Am Acad Audiol 1998; 9 (01) 1-19
  • 9 Gfeller K, Witt S, Woodworth G, Mehr MA, Knutson J. Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002; 111 (04) 349-356
  • 10 Gfeller K, Christ A, Knutson JF, Witt S, Murray KT, Tyler RS. Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11 (07) 390-406
  • 11 Mirza S, Douglas SA, Lindsey P, Hildreth T, Hawthorne M. Appreciation of music in adult patients with cochlear implants: a patient questionnaire. Cochlear Implants Int 2003; 4 (02) 85-95
  • 12 Gfeller K, Oleson J, Knutson JF, Breheny P, Driscoll V, Olszewski C. Multivariate predictors of music perception and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users. J Am Acad Audiol 2008; 19 (02) 120-134
  • 13 Philips B, Vinck B, De Vel E. et al. Characteristics and determinants of music appreciation in adult CI users. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 269 (03) 813-821
  • 14 Wright R, Uchanski RM. Music perception and appraisal: cochlear implant users and simulated cochlear implant listening. J Am Acad Audiol 2012; 23 (05) 350-365 , quiz 379
  • 15 Drennan WR, Oleson JJ, Gfeller K. et al. Clinical evaluation of music perception, appraisal and experience in cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol 2015; 54 (02) 114-123
  • 16 Miranda D. The role of music in adolescent development: much more than the same old song. Int J Adolesc Youth 2013; 18: 5-22
  • 17 Brown JD, Bobkowski PS. Older and newer media: patterns of use and effects on adolescents' health and well-being. J Res Adolesc 2011; 21: 95-113
  • 18 Chapman PL, Mullis RL. Adolescent coping strategies and self-esteem. Child Study J 1999; 29: 69-69
  • 19 Hargreaves DJ. Music and adolescent identity AU - North, Adrian C. Music Educ Res 1999; 1: 75-92
  • 20 North AC, Hargreaves DJ, O'Neill SA. The importance of music to adolescents. Br J Educ Psychol 2000; 70 (Pt 2): 255-272
  • 21 Johnson JK, Louhivuori J, Siljander E. Comparison of well-being of older adult choir singers and the general population in Finland: a case-control study. Music Sci 2017; 21 (02) 178-194
  • 22 Ekholm O, Juel K, Bonde LO. Associations between daily musicking and health: results from a nationwide survey in Denmark. Scand J Public Health 2016; 44 (07) 726-732
  • 23 Tambs K. Moderate effects of hearing loss on mental health and subjective well-being: results from the Nord-Trøndelag Hearing Loss Study. Psychosom Med 2004; 66 (05) 776-782
  • 24 Li CM, Zhang X, Hoffman HJ, Cotch MF, Themann CL, Wilson MR. Hearing impairment associated with depression in US adults, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2010. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 140 (04) 293-302
  • 25 Driscoll VD, Welhaven AE, Gfeller K, Oleson J, Olszewski CP. Music perception of adolescents using electroacoustic hearing. Otol Neurotol 2016; 37 (02) e141-e147
  • 26 Jung KH, Won JH, Drennan WR. et al. Psychoacoustic performance and music and speech perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants. Audiol Neurotol 2012; 17 (03) 189-197
  • 27 Kang R, Nimmons GL, Drennan W. et al. Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test. Ear Hear 2009; 30 (04) 411-418
  • 28 Yüksel M, Meredith MA, Rubinstein JT. Effects of low frequency residual hearing on music perception and psychoacoustic abilities in pediatric cochlear implant recipients. Front Neurosci 2019; 13: 924
  • 29 Yüksel M, Çiprut A. Music and psychoacoustic perception abilities in cochlear implant users with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 131: 109865
  • 30 Abascal E, Rada VDD. Analysis of 0 to 10-point response scales using factorial methods: a new perspective. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2014; 17: 569-584
  • 31 Scherpenzeel A. Why use 11-point scales. Swiss Household Panel 2002; 9: 2008
  • 32 Hoshino E. The feeling of musical mode and its emotional character in a melody. Psychol Music 1996; 24: 29-46
  • 33 Jäncke L. Music, memory and emotion. J Biol 2008; 7 (06) 21-21
  • 34 Marmel F, Tillmann B, Delbé C. Priming in melody perception: tracking down the strength of cognitive expectations. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2010; 36 (04) 1016-1028
  • 35 Aldridge D, Aldridge G. Melody in Music Therapy: A Therapeutic Narrative Analysis. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2008
  • 36 Looi V, She J. Music perception of cochlear implant users: a questionnaire, and its implications for a music training program. Int J Audiol 2010; 49 (02) 116-128
  • 37 Looi V, Gfeller K, Driscoll V. Music appreciation and training for cochlear implant recipients: a review. Semin Hear 2012; 33 (04) 307-334
  • 38 Weihing J, Chermak GD, Musiek FE. Auditory training for central auditory processing disorder. Semin Hear 2015; 36 (04) 199-215
  • 39 Gfeller K, Jiang D, Oleson JJ, Driscoll V, Knutson JF. Temporal stability of music perception and appraisal scores of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 2010; 21 (01) 28-34
  • 40 Moran M, Rousset A, Looi V. Music appreciation and music listening in prelingual and postlingually deaf adult cochlear implant recipients. Int J Audiol 2016; 55 (Suppl. 02) S57-S63