RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718444
Retrospective Evaluation of Patients Treated for Ectopic Pregnancy: Experience of a Tertiary Center
Autoren
Abstract
Objective In recent years, there has been an increase in the incidence of ectopic pregnancies; therefore, it is important for tertiary centers to report their approaches and outcomes to expand and improve treatment modalities. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the general characteristics, treatment and outcomes of cases diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy.
Methods In total, 432 patients treated for ectopic pregnancy between February 2016 and June 2019 were retrospectively evaluated.
Results Overall, 370 patients had tubal pregnancy, 32 had cesarean scar pregnancy, 18 had pregnancy of unknown location, 6 had cervical pregnancy, and 6 had interstitial pregnancy. The most important risk factors were advanced age (> 35 years; prevalence: 31.2%) and smoking (prevalence: 27.1%). Thirty patients who did not have any symptoms of rupture and whose human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) levels were ≤ 200 mIU/ml were followed-up with expectant management, while 316 patients whose β-hCG levels were between 1,500 mIU/ml and 5,000 mIU/ml did not have an intrauterine gestational sac on the transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound, did not demonstrate findings of rupture, and were treated with a systemic multi-dose methotrexate treatment protocol. In total, 24 patients who did not respond to the medical treatment, 20 patients whose β-hCG levels were > 5,000 mIU/ml, 16 patients who had shown symptoms of rupture at the initial presentation, and 6 patients diagnosed with interstitial pregnancy underwent surgery. Patients with cervical and scar pregnancies underwent ultrasound-guided curettage, and no additional treatment was needed.
Conclusion The fertility status of the patients, the clinical and laboratory findings, and the levels of β-hCG are the factors that must be considered in planning the appropriate treatment.
Contributions
All authors participated in the conception and design of the present study; in the analysis and interpretation of data; in the draft or revision of the manuscript; and they have approved the manuscript as submitted. All authors are responsible for the reported research.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 20. März 2020
Angenommen: 12. August 2020
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
21. Dezember 2020
© 2020. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
References
- 1 Demirdag E, Guler I, Abay S, Oguz Y, Erdem M, Erdem A. The impact of expectant management, systemic methotrexate and surgery on subsequent pregnancy outcomes in tubal ectopic pregnancy. Ir J Med Sci 2017; 186 (02) 387-392
- 2 Tsevat DG, Wiesenfeld HC, Parks C, Peipert JF. Sexually transmitted diseases and infertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216 (01) 1-9
- 3 Gaskins AJ, Missmer SA, Rich-Edwards JW, Williams PL, Souter I, Chavarro JE. Demographic, lifestyle, and reproductive risk factors for ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2018; 110 (07) 1328-1337
- 4 Jauniaux E, Jurkovic D. Ectopic pregnancy: 130 years of medical diagnostic challenges. BJOG 2018; 125 (13) 1672
- 5 Tulandi T. Ectopic pregnancy: choosing a treatment [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2010 Feb 10]. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/ectopic-pregnancy-choosing-a-treatment
- 6 Paull C, Robson SJ. Hospital admission and surgical approach to tubal ectopic pregnancy in Australia 2000 to 2014: A population-based study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 58 (02) 234-238
- 7 Lipscomb GH. Medical therapy for ectopic pregnancy. Semin Reprod Med 2007; 25 (02) 93-98
- 8 Hsu JY, Chen L, Gumer AR, Tergas AI, Hou JY, Burke WM. et al. Disparities in the management of ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 217 (01) 49.e1-49.e10
- 9 Mashiach R, Kislev I, Gilboa D, Mazaki-Tovi S, Seidman DS, Goldenberg M, Bouaziz J. Significant increase in serum hCG levels following methotrexate therapy is associated with lower treatment success rates in ectopic pregnancy patients. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018; 231: 188-191
- 10 Craig LB, Khan S. Expectant management of ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2012; 55 (02) 461-470
- 11 Moawad N, Baker S, Hergert S, Shuster J, Robinson M. Trends in the surgical management of ectopic pregnancy with the addition of MIS faculty. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017; 24 (7, Supplement) S81
- 12 Mavrelos D, Memtsa M, Helmy S, Derdelis G, Jauniaux E, Jurkovic D. β-hCG resolution times during expectant management of tubal ectopic pregnancies. BMC Womens Health 2015; 15: 43
- 13 Mol F, Mol BW, Ankum WM, van der Veen F, Hajenius PJ. Current evidence on surgery, systemic methotrexate and expectant management in the treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2008; 14 (04) 309-319
- 14 Nieuwkerk PT, Hajenius PJ, Ankum WM, Van der Veen F, Wijker W, Bossuyt PM. Systemic methotrexate therapy versus laparoscopic salpingostomy in patients with tubal pregnancy. Part I. Impact on patients' health-related quality of life. Fertil Steril 1998; 70 (03) 511-517
- 15 Lipscomb GH, Givens VA, Meyer NL, Bran D. Previous ectopic pregnancy as a predictor of failure of systemic methotrexate therapy. Fertil Steril 2004; 81 (05) 1221-1224
- 16 Alur-Gupta S, Cooney LG, Senapati S, Sammel MD, Barnhart KT. Two-dose versus single-dose methotrexate for treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 221 (02) 95-108.e2
- 17 Guzowski G, Sieroszewski P. Invasive ultrasound in the management of cervical ectopic pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014; 172: 7-9
- 18 Brady PC. New evidence to guide ectopic pregnancy diagnosis and management. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2017; 72 (10) 618-625
- 19 Bestel M, Karaaslan O, Bestel A, Salman S. Therapeutic curettage on follow up human chorionic gonadotropin levels in ectopic pregnancy. East J Med 2019; 24 (02) 200-203
- 20 de Haan J, Vandecaveye V, Han SN, Van de Vijver KK, Amant F. Difficulties with diagnosis of malignancies in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2016; 33: 19-32
- 21 Ades A, Parghi S. Laparoscopic resection of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017; 24 (04) 533-535
- 22 Laganà AS, Vitale SG, De Dominici R, Padula F, Rapisarda AMC, Biondi A. et al. Fertility outcome after laparoscopic salpingostomy or salpingectomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy A 12-years retrospective cohort study. Ann Ital Chir 2016; 87: 461-465