Simulation-based Training for Pelvic and Breast Physical Examination: Effect on the Anxiety and Self-confidence of Medical Students

Abstract

Objective To evaluate factors associated with anxiety and the effect of simulation-based training (SBT) on student anxiety, self-confidence and learning satisfaction in relation to pelvic and breast examination.

Methods A longitudinal study was conducted with 4^th year medical students at the Universidade José do Rosário Vellano. A 12-item, self-report questionnaire on student anxiety at performing gynecological examinations was applied before and after SBT, with answers being given on a Likert-type scale. After training, the self-confidence levels and satisfaction of the students related to the learning process were also evaluated.

Results Eighty students with a mean age of 24.1 ± 4.2 years were included in the study. Of these, 62.5% were women. Pre-SBT evaluation showed that students were more anxious at performing a pelvic examination than a breast examination (2.4 ± 1.0 versus 1.7 ± 0.8, respectively; p < 0.001). The primary reason for anxiety regarding both pelvic and breast examination was fear of hurting the patient. SBT significantly reduced student anxiety (2.0 ± 0.8 versus 1.5 ± 0.5, respectively; p < 0.001). The satisfaction and self-confidence of the students were found to be high (6.8 ± 0.3 and 6.0 ± 0.9, respectively), with no difference between genders.

Conclusion The use of SBT in teaching students to perform pelvic and breast examinations resulted in reduced anxiety and increased self-confidence in a group of medical students of both genders, with high levels of satisfaction in relation to the training.

Resumo

Objetivo Avaliar os fatores relacionados à ansiedade e ao efeito do treinamento baseado em simulação (TBS) na ansiedade, autoconfiança e satisfação do estudante em relação ao aprendizado do exame pélvico e de mamas.

Métodos Estudo longitudinal com alunos do quarto ano de medicina da Universidade José do Rosário Vellano, utilizando questionário autorrespondido com 12 itens em escala tipo Likert sobre a ansiedade em relação ao exame ginecológico, pré e pós-TBS. Após o treinamento, avaliou-se também o grau de autoconfiança e satisfação com o processo de aprendizado.

Resultados Foram incluídos 80 alunos com média etária de 24,1 ± 4,2 anos, dos quais 62,5% eram mulheres. Na avaliação pré-treinamento, a ansiedade dos alunos em relação ao exame pélvico foi maior do que a ansiedade em relação ao exame das mamas (2,4 ± 1,0 versus 1,7 ± 0,8, respectivamente; p < 0,001). O principal motivo de ansiedade em relação tanto ao exame pélvico quanto ao de mamas foi o receio de machucar a paciente. O TBS reduziu significativamente a ansiedade dos alunos (2,0 ± 0,8 versus 1,5 ± 0,5, respectivamente; p < 0,001). A satisfação e autoconfiança dos estudantes foram elevadas (6,8 ± 0,3 e 6,0 ± 0,9, respectivamente), sem diferença entre gêneros.

Conclusão O uso de TBS no ensino de exame pélvico e mamário resultou em uma diminuição na ansiedade e elevada autoconfiança em um grupo de estudantes de medicina, de ambos os gêneros, e bons níveis de satisfação em relação ao treinamento.

Keywords

vaginal examination - medical students - simulation-based training - anxiety - satisfaction

Palavras-chave

exame ginecológico - estudantes de medicina - treinamento por simulação - ansiedade - satisfação

Ethical Aspects

The students were invited to participate in the study and those who agreed signed an informed consent form before answering the questionnaire at baseline. The internal review board of the Universidade José do Rosário Vellano approved the study protocol under approval letter number 84309918.5.0000.5143.

Contributors

All of the authors contributed with the project and data interpretation, the writing of the article, the critical review of the intellectual content, and with the final approval of the version to be published.

Publication History

Received: 10 December 2019

Accepted: 03 August 2020

Article published online:
30 November 2020

• References

• 1 Martins APV. Visões do feminino: a medicina da mulher nos séculos XIX e XX. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz; 2004
• 2 Dilaveri CA, Szostek JH, Wang AT, Cook DA. Simulation training for breast and pelvic physical examination: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2013; 120 (10) 1171-1182 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12289.
• 3 Rio SMP, Trivellato IM, Caldeira NM, Araujo SF, Rezende DF. [Experience of women attended by medical students in gynecological care]. Rev Bras Educ Med 2013; 37 (04) 492-500 DOI: 10.1590/S0100-55022013000400004.
• 4 Okuda Y, Bryson EO, DeMaria Jr S, Jacobson L, Quinones J, Shen B, Levine AI. The utility of simulation in medical education: what is the evidence?. Mt Sinai J Med 2009; 76 (04) 330-343 DOI: 10.1002/msj.20127.
• 5 Almeida RGS, Mazzo A, Martins JCA, Baptista RCN, Girão FB, Mendes IAC. Validation to Portuguese of the Scale of Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2015; 23 (06) 1007-1013 DOI: 10.1590/0104-1169.0472.2643.
• 6 Gardner R, Raemer DB. Simulation in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2008; 35 (01) 97-127 , ix DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2007.12.008.
• 7 Bouet PE, Jeanneteau P, Legendre G, Hachem HE, Richard I, Granry J-C. et al. [Training of medical students for pelvic examination: Benefits of teaching on anatomic models]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2016; 45 (07) 679-684 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.09.006.
• 8 Hugon-Rodin J, Sonigo C, Drummond D, Grynberg M, Rodin T, Plu-Bureau G, Tesniere A. [Learning the gynecological examination on low-fidelity simulation: Impact on the feelings of medical students]. Gynécol Obstét Fertil Sénol 2017; 45 (05) 291-298 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2017.03.011.
• 9 Pugh CM, Obadina ET, Aidoo KA. Fear of causing harm: use of mannequin-based simulation to decrease student anxiety prior to interacting with female teaching associates. Teach Learn Med 2009; 21 (02) 116-120 DOI: 10.1080/10401330902791099.
• 10 Schubart JR, Erdahl L, Smith Jr JS, Purichia H, Kauffman GL, Kass RB. Use of breast simulators compared with standardized patients in teaching the clinical breast examination to medical students. J Surg Educ 2012; 69 (03) 416-422 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.10.005.
• 11 Pugh CM, Salud LH. Association for Surgical Education. Fear of missing a lesion: use of simulated breast models to decrease student anxiety when learning clinical breast examinations. Am J Surg 2007; 193 (06) 766-770 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.12.033.
• 12 Siwe K, Wijma K. Validation of the Fear of Pelvic Examination Scale (F-PEXS)–measuring students' fear of performing a pelvic examination. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 36 (01) 23-28 DOI: 10.3109/0167482X.2014.994500.
• 13 Abraham S, Chapman M, Taylor A, McBride A, Boyd C. Anxiety and feelings of medical students conducting their first gynecological examination. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 24 (01) 39-44 DOI: 10.3109/01674820309042799.
• 14 Deladisma AM, Gupta M, Kotranza A, Bittner IV JG. , Imam, Toufic, Swinson, D, et al. A pilot study to integrate an immersive virtual patient with a breast complaint and breast examination simulator into a surgery clerkship. Am J Surg 2009; 197 (01) 102-106 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.08.012.