Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2021; 34(03): 171-177
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718404
Original Research

Biomechanical Comparison of External Fixation and Double Plating for Stabilization of a Canine Cadaveric Supracondylar Humeral Fracture Gap Model

Sarah Castaldo
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, United States
,
Jason Syrcle
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, United States
,
Steve Elder
2   Agriculture and Biological Engineering, Bagley College of Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, United States
,
Robert W. Wills
3   Department of Basic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, United States
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was partially funded by a Mississippi State University House Officer Clinical Research Grant ($2,000). Reduced-cost implants were provided by IMEX, VOI and Orthomed.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Buy Article Permissions and Reprints
Zoom Image

Abstract

Objective Successful stabilization of comminuted supracondylar humeral fractures is challenging, and biomechanical studies are scarce. This study compares double-plate (DB-PLATE) and linear external fixator with an intramedullary pin tie-in (ESF-IMP) fixation techniques in a cadaveric gap model. The hypothesis was the DB-PLATE construct would be stiffer, stronger and more resistant to repeated loading than the ESF-IMP construct in both cyclic and load-to-failure axial compression testing.

Study Design A 2 cm ostectomy was performed on 10 pairs of canine cadaveric humeri proximal to the supratrochlear foramen. Stabilization was with DB-PLATE (n = 10) or ESF-IMP (n = 10). Cyclic testing was performed by applying a 200 N load at 2 Hz for 63,000 cycles. Axial compressive load to failure testing followed. Data analysed included dynamic stiffness, stiffness and yield load.

Results No constructs failed during cyclic testing or lost stiffness over time. Mean dynamic stiffness over the final 100 cycles was greater for DB-PLATE compared with ESF-IMP. Mean stiffness of DB-PLATE in load-to-failure testing was not different than ESF-IMP. Yield load of DB-PLATE was higher than ESF-IMP.

Conclusion Both DB-PLATE and ESF-IMP survived cyclic testing with no change in dynamic stiffness. DB-PLATE was stronger than ESF-IMP in load-to-failure testing, which may make this construct preferable when prolonged healing or poor patient compliance is anticipated. Results suggest that either method may be appropriate for fixation of comminuted supracondylar humeral fractures.

Keywords

supracondylar - humerus - external fixator - biomechanical testing - double-plate fixation

Authors' Contributions

All the authors contributed to study conception and study design. They contributed to acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation, drafting or revising the manuscript, and approved the submitted manuscript.




Publication History

Received: 26 November 2019

Accepted: 09 June 2020

Article published online:
16 October 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany