Prevalence and Utilization of Obturator Artery Anatomic Variant in Autologous Breast ReconstructionFunding None.
Background The objective of this study is to quantify the prevalence and describe the utilization of an anatomic vascular variant in which the obturator artery (OA) arises from the trunk of the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) in stacked/dual-pedicled autologous breast reconstruction. When this variant is identified preoperatively on computed tomography angiography (CTA), it may be utilized in a “flow-through” fashion to direct antegrade internal mammary artery (IMA) flow into a second free flap to facilitate anastomotic arrangement and optimize perfusion.
Methods Preoperatively obtained abdomen/pelvis CTA imaging of 121 autologous breast reconstruction patients were retrospectively reviewed for the unilateral or bilateral presence of the OA branch arising from the DIEA (OA variant). The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Results Our analysis revealed the presence of the OA variant in 60 of the 121 (49.6%) breast reconstruction candidates, either unilaterally or bilaterally. Out of these patients, the variant was present unilaterally in 33 (55%) and bilaterally in 27 (45%) patients. Of the unilateral variants, 12 (36.4%) patients demonstrated right-sided laterality, while 21 (63.6%) patients demonstrated left-sided laterality. Clinically, this anatomic variant has been utilized in several cases of autologous breast reconstruction with flap survival in all cases.
Conclusion Utilization of this anatomic variant in stacked or dual-pedicled autologous breast reconstruction results in antegrade IMA perfusion of both primary and secondary flaps, as well as improved size match compared with other anastomotic options. Knowledge of the vascular anatomy and variations in the inferior epigastric system is crucial to both preventing complications and optimizing flap planning and outcome.
Received: 01 June 2020
Accepted: 25 August 2020
08 October 2020 (online)
© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers
333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
- 1 Allen RJ, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 32 (01) 32-38
- 2 Hamdi M, Rebecca A. The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (DIEAP) in breast reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2006; 20 (02) 95-102
- 3 Chang DW. Breast reconstruction with microvascular MS-TRAM and DIEP flaps. Arch Plast Surg 2012; 39 (01) 3-10
- 4 Munder B, Andree C, Witzel C. et al. The DIEP flap as well-established method of choice for autologous breast reconstruction with a low complication rate - retrospective single-centre 10-year experience. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020; 80 (06) 628-638
- 5 Tan MG, Isaranuwatchai W, DeLyzer T. et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of DIEP vs free MS-TRAM flap for microsurgical breast reconstruction. J Surg Oncol 2019; 119 (03) 388-396
- 6 Beahm EK, Walton RL. The efficacy of bilateral lower abdominal free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (01) 41-54
- 7 Agarwal JP, Gottlieb LJ. Double pedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 58 (04) 359-363
- 8 Hamdi M, Khuthaila DK, Van Landuyt K, Roche N, Monstrey S. Double-pedicle abdominal perforator free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction: new horizons in microsurgical tissue transfer to the breast. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007; 60 (08) 904-912 , discussion 913–914
- 9 Murray A, Wasiak J, Rozen WM, Ferris S, Grinsell D. Stacked abdominal flap for unilateral breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (03) 179-186
- 10 Malata CM, Rabey NG. Decision making in double-pedicled DIEP and SIEA abdominal free flap breast reconstructions: an algorithmic approach and comprehensive classification. Front Surg 2015; 2: 49 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00049.
- 11 Sbitany H, Lentz R, Piper M. The “Dual-Plane” DIEP flap: measuring the effects of superficial arterial and venous flow augmentation on clinical outcomes. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (06) 411-416
- 12 Gassman AA, Pan J, Acevedo Jr E, Haddock N, Teotia S. The superficial and deep inferior epigastric artery composite perforator flap for breast reconstruction: a case report. Microsurgery 2018; 38 (07) 799-803
- 13 Cohen AJ, Ameika JA, Briggs RA, Grishkin BA, Helsel RA. Retrograde flow in the internal mammary artery. Ann Thorac Surg 1988; 45 (01) 48-49
- 14 González-Santos JM, Bastida E, Riesgo M. et al. Flow capacity of the human retrograde internal mammary artery: surgical considerations. Ann Thorac Surg 1990; 50 (03) 360-366
- 15 Li S, Mu L, Li Y. et al. Breast reconstruction with the free bipedicled inferior TRAM flap by anastomosis to the proximal and distal ends of the internal mammary vessels. J Reconstr Microsurg 2002; 18 (03) 161-168
- 16 Stalder MW, Lam J, Allen RJ, Sadeghi A. Using the retrograde internal mammary system for stacked perforator flap breast reconstruction: 71 breast reconstructions in 53 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (02) 265e-277e
- 17 Salgarello M, Visconti G, Barone-Adesi L, Cina A. The retrograde limb of internal mammary vessels as reliable recipient vessels in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a clinical and radiological study. Ann Plast Surg 2015; 74 (04) 447-453
- 18 Hamdi M, Blondeel P, Van Landuyt K, Monstrey S. Algorithm in choosing recipient vessels for perforator free flap in breast reconstruction: the role of the internal mammary perforators. Br J Plast Surg 2004; 57 (03) 258-265
- 19 Pai MM, Krishnamurthy A, Prabhu LV, Pai MV, Kumar SA, Hadimani GA. Variability in the origin of the obturator artery. Clinics (São Paulo) 2009; 64 (09) 897-901
- 20 Gilroy AM, Hermey DC, DiBenedetto LM, Marks Jr SCJ, Page DW, Lei QF. Variability of the obturator vessels. Clin Anat 1997; 10 (05) 328-332
- 21 Ates M, Kinaci E, Kose E. et al. Corona mortis: in vivo anatomical knowledge and the risk of injury in totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 2016; 20 (05) 659-665
- 22 Sanna B, Henry BM, Vikse J. et al. The prevalence and morphology of the corona mortis (Crown of death): a meta-analysis with implications in abdominal wall and pelvic surgery. Injury 2018; 49 (02) 302-308
- 23 Requarth JA, Miller PR. Aberrant obturator artery is a common arterial variant that may be a source of unidentified hemorrhage in pelvic fracture patients. J Trauma 2011; 70 (02) 366-372
- 24 Smith JC, Gregorius JC, Breazeale BH, Watkins GE. The corona mortis, a frequent vascular variant susceptible to blunt pelvic trauma: identification at routine multidetector CT. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 20 (04) 455-460
- 25 Tajra JBM, Lima CF, Pires FR, Sales L, Junqueira D, Mauro E. Variability of the obturator artery with its surgical implications. J Morphol Sci 2016; 33 (02) 96-98
- 26 Perandini S, Perandini A, Puntel G, Puppini G, Montemezzi S. Corona mortis variant of the obturator artery: a systematic study of 300 hemipelvises by means of computed tomography angiography. Pol J Radiol 2018; 83: e519-e523
- 27 Noussios G, Galanis N, Chatzis I. et al. The anatomical characteristics of corona mortis: a systematic review of the literature and its clinical importance in hernia repair. J Clin Med Res 2020; 12 (02) 108-114
- 28 Steinberg EL, Ben-Tov T, Aviram G, Steinberg Y, Rath E, Rosen G. Corona mortis anastomosis: a three-dimensional computerized tomographic angiographic study. Emerg Radiol 2017; 24 (05) 519-523
- 29 Teunis T, Heerma van Voss MR, Kon M, van Maurik JFMM. CT-angiography prior to DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (06) 496-502
- 30 Mohan AT, Saint-Cyr M. Advances in imaging technologies for planning breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2016; 5 (02) 242-254
- 31 Cho M-J, Haddock NT, Teotia SS. Clinical decision making using CTA in conjoined, bipedicled DIEP and SIEA for unilateral breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (04) 241-246
- 32 Uppal RS, Casaer B, Van Landuyt K, Blondeel P. The efficacy of preoperative mapping of perforators in reducing operative times and complications in perforator flap breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (07) 859-864
- 33 Malhotra A, Chhaya N, Nsiah-Sarbeng P, Mosahebi A. CT-guided deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap localization -- better for the patient, the surgeon, and the hospital. Clin Radiol 2013; 68 (02) 131-138
- 34 Chae MP, Hunter-Smith DJ, Rozen WM. Comparative analysis of fluorescent angiography, computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for planning autologous breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2015; 4 (02) 164-178
- 35 Rodkin B, Hunter-Smith DJ, Rozen WM. A review of visualized preoperative imaging with a focus on surgical procedures of the breast. Gland Surg 2019; 8 (Suppl. 04) S301-S309
- 36 Ali RS, Garrido A, Ramakrishnan V. Stacked free hemi-DIEP flaps: a method of autologous breast reconstruction in a patient with midline abdominal scarring. Br J Plast Surg 2002; 55 (04) 351-353
- 37 Seth AK, Koolen PGL, Sultan SM, Lee BT, Erhard HA, Greenspun DT. Unilateral autologous breast reconstruction with bi-pedicled, conjoined deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (02) 145-155
- 38 Sultan SM, Seth AK, Lamelas AM, Greenspun DT, Erhard HA. Bipedicle-conjoined deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction in overweight and obese patients: do the benefits outweigh the risks?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (05) 346-352
- 39 Seth AK, Allen Jr RJ. Modern techniques and alternative flaps in microsurgical breast reconstruction. J Surg Oncol 2018; 118 (05) 768-779
- 40 Saint-Cyr M, Youssef A, Bae HW, Robb GL, Chang DW. Changing trends in recipient vessel selection for microvascular autologous breast reconstruction: an analysis of 1483 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (07) 1993-2000
- 41 Tansatit T, Chokrungvaranont P, Sanguansit P, Wanidchaphloi S. Neurovascular anatomy of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. J Med Assoc Thai 2006; 89 (10) 1630-1640
- 42 Colohan S, Maia M, Langevin CJ. et al. The short- and ultrashort-pedicle deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (02) 331-340
- 43 Darmanis S, Lewis A, Mansoor A, Bircher M. Corona mortis: an anatomical study with clinical implications in approaches to the pelvis and acetabulum. Clin Anat 2007; 20 (04) 433-439
- 44 Rockwell WB, Hurst CA, Morton DA, Kwok A, Foreman KB. The deep inferior epigastric artery: anatomy and applicability as a source of microvascular arterial grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (01) 209-214
- 45 Ireton JE, Lakhiani C, Saint-Cyr M. Vascular anatomy of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (05) 810e-821e
- 46 Teotia SS, Dumestre DO, Jayaraman AP, Sanniec KJ, Haddock NT. Revisiting anastomosis to the retrograde internal mammary system in stacked free flap breast reconstruction: an algorithmic approach to recipient-site selection. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (04) 880-887