Prevalence and Risk Factors for Bilateral Meniscal Tears Identified during Treatment for Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease Via Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy in DogsFunding Funding for statistical analysis and manuscript preparation was provided by BluePearl Sciences.
Objective The aim of this study was to report the prevalence and risk factors of bilateral meniscal tears during a tibial plateau levelling osteotomy (TPLO).
Methods Data from 362 dogs that underwent staged or simultaneous TPLO between January 2006 and April 2019 were retrospectively collected. Variables such as breed, sex, weight change and intervals between surgeries were analysed with logistic regression. Preoperative tibial plateau angle, age, cranial cruciate ligament status and body weight were analysed with a generalized linear mixed model. All analyses were performed to assess the likelihood of bilateral meniscal tears versus unilateral tears and no tears. Correlation of meniscal tears between stifles was assessed with Cohen's kappa coefficient.
Results Prevalence of bilateral meniscal tears was 48.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 43.0–53.0%). There was moderate agreement of the presence of meniscal tears between stifles (Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.31–0.51).The odds for bilateral meniscal tears were higher for Rottweilers (odds ratio [OR:] 4.5 [95% CI 1.1–30.3], p = 0.033), older dogs (OR: 1.2 [95% CI: 1.1–1.4 per year], p < 0.0001), smaller dogs (OR: 0.98 [95% CI: 0.97–0.99 per 0.45-kg], p = 0.001), stifles with complete cranial cruciate ligament tears (OR: 21.1 [95% CI: 7.1–62.4], p < 0.0001).
Conclusion Contralateral meniscal tears, breed, older age, lower patient weight and complete cranial cruciate ligament tear were significant risk factors for bilateral meniscal tears. Surgeons can use these results to determine prognoses and propensities for meniscal tears in at-risk dogs.
Keywordscruciate ligament disease - stifle joint - tibial plateau levelling osteotomy - medial meniscus - dog
Both authors contributed to conception of study, study design, acquisition of data and data analysis and interpretation. Both authors drafted, revised and approved the submitted manuscript.
Due to the observational and retrospective nature of the study, the ethical committee approval and the owner consent were waived.
Received: 06 November 2019
Accepted: 24 July 2020
16 October 2020 (online)
© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
- 1 Fitzpatrick N, Solano MA. Predictive variables for complications after TPLO with stifle inspection by arthrotomy in 1000 consecutive dogs. Vet Surg 2010; 39 (04) 460-474
- 2 Guthrie JW, Keeley BJ, Maddock E, Bright SR, May C. Effect of signalment on the presentation of canine patients suffering from cranial cruciate ligament disease. J Small Anim Pract 2012; 53 (05) 273-277
- 3 Canapp Jr SO. The canine stifle. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 2007; 22 (04) 195-205
- 4 Vasseur PB. Stifle Joint. In: Slatter D. Textbook of small animal surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1993: 1817-1865
- 5 Won WW, Lee AM, Butler JR, Wills RW, Brinkman EL. Association of meniscal injury to joint space width on standard tibial plateau leveling osteotomy lateral radiographic projections of the canine stifle. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2020; 61 (01) 16-24
- 6 Buote N, Fusco J, Radasch R. Age, tibial plateau angle, sex, and weight as risk factors for contralateral rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in Labradors. Vet Surg 2009; 38 (04) 481-489
- 7 Van der Vekens E, de Bakker E, Bogaerts E. et al. High-frequency ultrasound, computed tomography and computed tomography arthrography of the cranial cruciate ligament, menisci and cranial meniscotibial ligaments in 10 radiographically normal canine cadaver stifles. BMC Vet Res 2019; 15 (01) 146
- 8 Jackson J, Vasseur PB, Griffey S, Walls CM, Kass PH. Pathologic changes in grossly normal menisci in dogs with rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001; 218 (08) 1281-1284
- 9 Kaufman K, Beale BS, Thames HD, Saunders WB. Articular cartilage scores in cranial cruciate ligament-deficient dogs with or without bucket handle tears of the medial meniscus. Vet Surg 2017; 46 (01) 120-129
- 10 Ritzo ME, Ritzo BA, Siddens AD, Summerlott S, Cook JL. Incidence and type of meniscal injury and associated long-term clinical outcomes in dogs treated surgically for cranial cruciate ligament disease. Vet Surg 2014; 43 (08) 952-958
- 11 Park BH, Banks SA, Pozzi A. Quantifying meniscal kinematics in dogs. J Orthop Res 2018; 36 (06) 1710-1716
- 12 Necas A, Zatloukal J. Factors related to the risk of meniscal injury in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Acta Vet Brno 2002; 71: 77-84
- 13 Hayes GM, Langley-Hobbs SJ, Jeffery ND. Risk factors for medial meniscal injury in association with cranial cruciate ligament rupture. J Small Anim Pract 2010; 51 (12) 630-634
- 14 Franklin SP, Cook JL, Cook CR, Shaikh LS, Clarke KM, Holmes SP. Comparison of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging to arthroscopy for diagnosing medial meniscal lesions in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament deficiency. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2017; 251 (01) 71-79
- 15 Mahn MM, Cook JL, Cook CR, Balke MT. Arthroscopic verification of ultrasonographic diagnosis of meniscal pathology in dogs. Vet Surg 2005; 34 (04) 318-323
- 16 Pozzi A, Hildreth III BE, Rajala-Schultz PJ. Comparison of arthroscopy and arthrotomy for diagnosis of medial meniscal pathology: an ex vivo study. Vet Surg 2008; 37 (08) 749-755
- 17 Rogatko CP, Warnock JJ, Bobe G, Verpaalen VD. Comparison of iatrogenic articular cartilage injury in canine stifle arthroscopy versus medial parapatellar mini-arthrotomy in a cadaveric model. Vet Surg 2018; 47 (S1): O6-O14
- 18 Slocum B, Slocum TD. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the canine. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1993; 23 (04) 777-795
- 19 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33 (01) 159-174
- 20 Kalff S, Meachem S, Preston C. Incidence of medial meniscal tears after arthroscopic assisted tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. Vet Surg 2011; 40 (08) 952-956
- 21 McCready DJ, Ness MG. Systematic review of the prevalence, risk factors, diagnosis and management of meniscal injury in dogs: Part 1. [corrected]. J Small Anim Pract 2016; 57 (02) 59-66
- 22 Ralphs SC, Whitney WO. Arthroscopic evaluation of menisci in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament injuries: 100 cases (1999-2000). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 221 (11) 1601-1604
- 23 Adams P, Bolus R, Middleton S, Moores AP, Grierson J. Influence of signalment on developing cranial cruciate rupture in dogs in the UK. J Small Anim Pract 2011; 52 (07) 347-352
- 24 Kulkarni VV, Chand K. Pathological anatomy of the aging meniscus. Acta Orthop Scand 1975; 46 (01) 135-140
- 25 Takahashi M, Suzuki M, Kushida K, Hoshino H, Inoue T. The effect of aging and osteoarthritis on the mature and senescent cross-links of collagen in human meniscus. Arthroscopy 1998; 14 (04) 366-372
- 26 Dillon DE, Gordon-Evans WJ, Griffon DJ, Knap KM, Bubb CL, Evans RB. Risk factors and diagnostic accuracy of clinical findings for meniscal disease in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease. Vet Surg 2014; 43 (04) 446-450
- 27 Park JY, Jeong BS, Roh YS, Jeong SM, Lee HB. Evaluation of an arthroscopic stifle lever for stifle joint distraction in toy breed dogs. J Vet Sci 2018; 19 (05) 693-698