The Effect of Hearing Loss on Localization of Amplitude-Panned and Physical Sources

Abstract

Background Clinics are increasingly turning toward using virtual environments to demonstrate and validate hearing aid fittings in “realistic” listening situations before the patient leaves the clinic. One of the most cost-effective and straightforward ways to create such an environment is through the use of a small speaker array and amplitude panning. Amplitude panning is a signal playback method used to change the perceived location of a source by changing the level of two or more loudspeakers. The perceptual consequences (i.e., perceived source width and location) of amplitude panning have been well-documented for listeners with normal hearing but not for listeners with hearing impairment.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the perceptual consequences of amplitude panning for listeners with hearing statuses from normal hearing through moderate sensorineural hearing losses.

Research Design Listeners performed a localization task. Sound sources were broadband 4 Hz amplitude-modulated white noise bursts. Thirty-nine sources (14 physical) were produced by either physical loudspeakers or via amplitude panning. Listeners completed a training block of 39 trials (one for each source) before completing three test blocks of 39 trials each. Source production method was randomized within block.

Study Sample Twenty-seven adult listeners (mean age 52.79, standard deviation 27.36, 10 males, 17 females) with hearing ranging from within normal limits to moderate bilateral sensorineural hearing loss participated in the study. Listeners were recruited from a laboratory database of listeners that consented to being informed about available studies.

Data Collection and Analysis Listeners indicated the perceived source location via touch screen. Outcome variables were azimuth error, elevation error, and total angular error (Euclidean distance in degrees between perceived and correct location). Listeners' pure-tone averages (PTAs) were calculated and used in mixed-effects models along with source type and the interaction between source type and PTA as predictors. Subject was included as a random variable.

Results Significant interactions between PTA and source production method were observed for total and elevation errors. Listeners with higher PTAs (i.e., worse hearing) did not localize physical and panned sources differently whereas listeners with lower PTAs (i.e., better hearing) did. No interaction was observed for azimuth errors; however, there was a significant main effect of PTA.

Conclusion As hearing impairment becomes more severe, listeners localize physical and panned sources with similar errors. Because physical and panned sources are not localized differently by adults with hearing loss, amplitude panning could be an appropriate method for constructing virtual environments for these listeners.

Keywords

hearing loss - auditory perception - spatial processing

Previous Presentations

Portions of this work were presented at the 177th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America in Louisville, Kentucky. The meeting was in May, 2019.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 31. Oktober 2019

Angenommen: 27. März 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
08. Oktober 2020

• References

• 1 Benítez-Barrera CR, Thompson EC, Angley GP, Woynaroski T, Tharpe AM. Remote microphone system use at home: impact on child-directed speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2019; 62 (06) 2002-2008
• 2 Gatehouse S, Naylor G, Elberling C. Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings--2. Patterns of candidature. Int J Audiol 2006; 45 (03) 153-171
• 3 Klein KE, Wu Y-H, Stangl E, Bentler RA. Using a digital language processor to quantify the auditory environment and the effect of hearing aids for adults with hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol 2018; 29 (04) 279-291
• 4 Wu Y-H, Stangl E, Chipara O, Hasan SS, Welhaven A, Oleson J. Characteristics of real-world signal to noise ratios and speech listening situations of older adults with mild to moderate hearing loss. Ear Hear 2018; 39 (02) 293-304
• 5 Timmer BHB, Hickson L, Launer S. Do hearing aids address real-world hearing difficulties for adults with mild hearing impairment? Results from a pilot study using ecological momentary assessment. Trends Hear 2018; 22: 2331216518783608
• 6 Wu Y-H, Stangl E, Zhang X, Bentler RA. Construct validity of the ecological momentary assessment in audiology research. J Am Acad Audiol 2015; 26 (10) 872-884
• 7 Compton-Conley CL, Neuman AC, Killion MC, Levitt H. Performance of directional microphones for hearing aids: real-world versus simulation. J Am Acad Audiol 2004; 15 (06) 440-455
• 8 Miller CW, Stewart EK, Wu Y-H, Bishop C, Bentler RA, Tremblay K. Working memory and speech recognition in noise under ecologically relevant listening conditions: effects of visual cues and noise type among adults with hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2017; 60 (08) 2310-2320
• 9 Valente M, Mispagel KM, Tchorz J, Fabry D. Effect of type of noise and loudspeaker array on the performance of omnidirectional and directional microphones. J Am Acad Audiol 2006; 17 (06) 398-412
• 10 Frank M, Zotter F, Sontacchi A. Producing 3D audio in Ambisonics. Paper presented at the 57th International Conference: The future of audio entertainment technology; March 6–8, 2015; Hollywood, CA
• 11 Pulkki V. Virtual sound source position using vector base amplitude panning. J Audio Eng Soc 1997; 45 (06) 456-466
• 12 Seldess Z. MIAP: manifold-interface amplitude panning in Max/MSP and pure data. Paper presented at the Audio Engineering Society Convention 137; 2014
• 13 Baumgartner R, Majdak P. Modeling localization of amplitude-panned virtual sources in sagittal planes. J Audio Eng Soc 2015; 63 (7-8): 562-569
• 14 Pulkki V. Localization of amplitude-panned virtual sources II: two-and three-dimensional panning. J Audio Eng Soc 2001; 49 (09) 753-767
• 15 Pulkki V, Karjalainen M. Localization of amplitude-panned virtual sources - I: stereophonic panning. J Audio Eng Soc 2001; 49 (09) 739-752
• 16 Wendt K. Das Richtungshören bei der Überlageruun zqeier Schallfelder bei Intensitäts - un Laufzeitstereophonie [Directional hearing with two superimposed sound fields in intensity- and delay-different stereophony]. Aachen: Technische Hochschule; 1963
• 17 Blauert J. Spatial Hearing: the Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1983
• 18 Brungart DS, Durlach NI, Rabinowitz WM. Auditory localization of nearby sources. II. Localization of a broadband source. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 106 (4 Pt 1): 1956-1968
• 19 Giguère C, Abel SM. Sound localization: effects of reverberation time, speaker array, stimulus frequency, and stimulus rise/decay. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94 (2 Pt 1): 769-776
• 20 Hartmann WM. Localization of sound in rooms. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 74 (05) 1380-1391
• 21 Hartmann WM, Rakerd B. Localization of sound in rooms. IV: the Franssen effect. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 86 (04) 1366-1373
• 22 Middlebrooks JC. Narrow-band sound localization related to external ear acoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 92 (05) 2607-2624
• 23 Mills AW. On the minimum audible angle. J Acoust Soc Am 1958; 30 (04) 237-246
• 24 Wightman FL, Kistler DJ, Perkins ME. A new approach to the study of human sound localization. In: Yost WA, Gourevitch G. eds. Directional Hearing. New York, NY: Springer; 1987: 26-48
• 25 Johnson JA, Xu J, Cox RM. Impact of hearing aid technology on outcomes in daily life III: localization. Ear Hear 2017; 38 (06) 746-759
• 26 Oreinos C, Buchholz JM. Evaluation of loudspeaker-based virtual sound environments for testing directional hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 2016; 27 (07) 541-556
• 27 Ricketts TA, Picou EM, Shehorn J, Dittberner AB. Degree of hearing loss affects bilateral hearing aid benefits in ecologically relevant laboratory conditions. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2019; 62 (10) 3834-3850
• 28 Weller T, Best V, Buchholz JM, Young T. A method for assessing auditory spatial analysis in reverberant multitalker environments. J Am Acad Audiol 2016; 27 (07) 601-611
• 29 Hair JFJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate Data Analysis. 3rd ed.. New York: Macmillan; 1995
• 30 Ringle CM, Wende S, Becker JM. SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH; 2015
• 31 Dorman MF, Loiselle LH, Cook SJ, Yost WA, Gifford RH. Sound source localization by normal-hearing listeners, hearing-impaired listeners and cochlear implant listeners. Audiol Neurotol 2016; 21 (03) 127-131
• 32 Häusler R, Colburn S, Marr E. Sound localization in subjects with impaired hearing: Spatial-discrimination and interaural-discrimination tests. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1983; 400: 1-62
• 33 Moore BCJ. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. 6th ed.. Leiden: Brill; 2013