Policy Statement on Clinical Informatics Fellowships and the Future of Informatics-Driven Medicine

Abstract

Board certified clinical informaticians provide expertise in leveraging health IT (HIT) and health data for patient care and quality improvement. Clinical Informatics experts possess the requisite skills and competencies to make systems-level improvements in care delivery using HIT, workflow and data analytics, knowledge acquisition, clinical decision support, data visualization, and related informatics tools. However, these physicians lack structured and sustained funding because they have no billing codes. The sustainability and growth of this new and promising medical subspecialty is threatened by outdated and inconsistent funding models that fail to support the education and professional growth of clinical informaticians. The Clinical Informatics Program Directors' Community is calling upon the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to consider novel funding structures and programs through its Innovation Center for Clinical Informatics Fellowship training. Only through structural and sustained funding for Clinical Informatics fellows will be able to fully develop the potential of electronic health records to improve the quality, safety, and cost of clinical care.

Keywords

clinical informatics - professional training - education - Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education - Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services - education and strategies for HIT

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

None.

Publication History

Received: 09 June 2020

Accepted: 21 August 2020

Article published online:
28 October 2020

• References

• 1 Lehmann CU, Gundlapalli AV, Williamson JJ. et al. Five years of Clinical Informatics Board Certification for Physicians in the United States of America. Yearb Med Inform 2018; 27 (01) 237-242
• 2 Lehmann CU, Shorte V, Gundlapalli AV. Clinical informatics sub-specialty board certification. Pediatr Rev 2013; 34 (11) 525-530
• 3 Lehmann CU, Longhurst CA, Hersh W. et al. Clinical Informatics Fellowship Programs: in search of a viable financial model: an open letter to the centers for medicare and medicaid services. Appl Clin Inform 2015; 6 (02) 267-270
• 4 Alkureishi MA, Lee WW, Lyons M. et al. Impact of electronic medical record use on the patient-doctor relationship and communication: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2016; 31 (05) 548-560
• 5 Khairat S, Burke G, Archambault H, Schwartz T, Larson J, Ratwani RM. Perceived burden of EHRs on physicians at different stages of their career. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (02) 336-347
• 6 Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye LN, Sinsky C. et al. Relationship between clerical burden and characteristics of the electronic environment with physician burnout and professional satisfaction. Mayo Clin Proc 2016; 91 (07) 836-848
• 7 Downing NL, Bates DW, Longhurst CA. Physician burnout in the electronic health record era: are we ignoring the real cause?. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169 (01) 50-51
• 8 Linzer M, Poplau S, Babbott S. et al. Worklife and wellness in academic general internal medicine: results from a national survey. J Gen Intern Med 2016; 31 (09) 1004-1010
• 9 Arndt RZ. No end in sight: EHRs hit hospitals' bottom lines with uncertain benefits. Available at: https://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20181013/NEWS/181019945/no-end-in-sight-ehrs-hit-hospitals-bottom-lines-with-uncertain-benefits . Published 2018. Accessed Sept 9, 2019
• 10 Lawes SMG. Medication errors attributed to health information technology. Available at: https://psnet.ahrq.gov/resources/resource/30704/medication-errors-attributed-to-health-information-technology Published 2017. Accessed January 2019
• 11 Joynt Maddox KE, Orav EJ, Zheng J, Epstein AM. Evaluation of medicare's bundled payments initiative for medical conditions. N Engl J Med 2018; 379 (03) 260-269
• 12 Government Accounting Office (GAO). Hospital value-based purchasing: initial results show modest effects on Medicare payments and no apparent change in quality-of-care trends. Available at: https://www.gao.gov/assets/680/672899.pdf . Published 2015. Accessed September 9, 2019
• 13 Papanicolas I, Figueroa JF, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Patient hospital experience improved modestly, but no evidence medicare incentives promoted meaningful gains. Health Aff (Millwood) 2017; 36 (01) 133-140
• 14 Koppel R, Lehmann CU. Implications of an emerging EHR monoculture for hospitals and healthcare systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; 22 (02) 465-471
• 15 Kannry J, Sengstack P, Thyvalikakath TP. et al. The Chief Clinical Informatics Officer (CCIO): AMIA task force report on CCIO knowledge, education, and skillset requirements. Appl Clin Inform 2016; 7 (01) 143-176
• 16 Kannry J, Fridsma D. The chief clinical informatics officer (CCIO). J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; 23 (02) 435
• 17 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Innovation Models. CMS Innovation Center. Available at: https://innovation.cms.gov/innovation-models#views=models
• 18 American Medical Informatics Assocation (AMIA). AMIA offers new directions for CMS innovation. AMIA. Available at: https://www.amia.org/news-and-publications/press-release/amia-offers-new-directions-cms-innovation . Published 2017. Accessed July 20, 2020
• 19 American Medical Informatics Assocation (AMIA). AMIA urges CMS to focus on health IT improvement activities in hospital payment rule. Available at: https://www.amia.org/news-and-publications/press-release/amia-urges-cms-focus-health-it-improvement-activities-hospital . Published 2018. Accessed July 20, 2020