CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Neurol Surg Rep 2020; 81(03): e52-e58
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1717056
Case Report

Intracranial Intradural Vascular Injury during Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Case Report and Literature Review

1   Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
,
Saad Alsaleh
2   Department of Otolaryngology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
,
Yaser Babgi
3   Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
,
1   Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
,
Abdulrazag Ajlan
3   Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) is a procedure for sellar or midline masses in the skull base. Among the reported complications are iatrogenic vascular injuries; that are rare, yet they carry devastating outcomes, with an incidence of injury between 0.34 and 2.6%. The cavernous internal carotid artery is the most commonly injured. However, intradural arterial injuries are much less reported with challenging management. We report a rare incident of intradural arterial injury during TSS, and we compared our management to the summarized few cases reported in the literature

Case Report We report a 43-year-old female who had a recurrent planum sphenoidal meningioma. She underwent trans-nasal transsphenoidal endoscopic resection that was complicated with intraoperative bleeding due to an injury to the anterior communicating artery that was challenging to control, resulted in a bilateral loss of flow in A1 segments of anterior cerebral artery and required endovascular management. The patient had a good recovery postoperatively without the typical picture of ACA syndrome.

Conclusion Intradural arterial injury is exceedingly rare in TSS, with no clear standard of care for the management. Collateral blood supply allows definitive management with minimal morbidity. Identifying the risk factors beforehand, as well as performing such cases in a well-resourced center, are crucial elements of safety.



Publication History

Received: 14 February 2020

Accepted: 25 June 2020

Article published online:
24 September 2020

© 2020. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 
  • References

  • 1 Miller BA, Ioachimescu AG, Oyesiku NM. Contemporary indications for transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 (6, Suppl): S147-S151
  • 2 Matsuo T, Kamada K, Izumo T, Nagata I. Indication and limitations of endoscopic extended transsphenoidal surgery for craniopharyngioma. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2014; 54 (12) 974-982
  • 3 Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Esposito F, De Divitiis O, Messina A, De Divitiis E. Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the midline skull base: the evolving role of transsphenoidal surgery. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 2008; 33: 151-199
  • 4 Cavallo LM, Frank G, Cappabianca P. et al. The endoscopic endonasal approach for the management of craniopharyngiomas: a series of 103 patients. J Neurosurg 2014; 121 (01) 100-113
  • 5 Jho HD. Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurooncol 2001; 54 (02) 187-195
  • 6 Wang F, Zhou T, Wei S. et al. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery of 1,166 pituitary adenomas. Surg Endosc 2015; 29 (06) 1270-1280
  • 7 Berker M, Hazer DB, Yücel T. et al. Complications of endoscopic surgery of the pituitary adenomas: analysis of 570 patients and review of the literature. Pituitary 2012; 15 (03) 288-300
  • 8 Chivukula S, Koutourousiou M, Snyderman CH, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner PA, Tyler-Kabara EC. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery in the pediatric population. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2013; 11 (03) 227-241
  • 9 Charalampaki P, Ayyad A, Kockro RA, Perneczky A. Surgical complications after endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. J Clin Neurosci 2009; 16 (06) 786-789
  • 10 Turel MK, Tsermoulas G, Reddy D, Andrade-Barazarte H, Zadeh G, Gentili F. Endonasal endoscopic transsphenoidal excision of tuberculum sellae meningiomas: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Sci 2016; 60 (04) 463-475
  • 11 Romero A, Lal Gangadharan J, Bander E, Gobin Y, Anand V, Schwartz T. Managing arterial injury in endoscopic skull base surgery. Operative Neurosurgery. 2015; 1;
  • 12 Berker M, Aghayev K, Saatci I, Palaoğlu S, Önerci M. Overview of vascular complications of pituitary surgery with special emphasis on unexpected abnormality. Pituitary 2010; 13 (02) 160-167
  • 13 Laws Jr ER. Vascular complications of transsphenoidal surgery. Pituitary 1999; 2 (02) 163-170
  • 14 Yang H, Li SG, Xiang X. et al. Clinical classification and individualized design for the treatment of basicranial artery injuries. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98 (11) e14732
  • 15 Ciceri EF, Regna-Gladin C, Erbetta A. et al. Iatrogenic intracranial pseudoaneurysms: neuroradiological and therapeutical considerations, including endovascular options. Neurol Sci 2006; 27 (05) 317-322
  • 16 Kassam AB, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL. et al. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: analysis of complications in the authors' initial 800 patients. J Neurosurg 2011; 114 (06) 1544-1568
  • 17 Çinar C, Bozkaya H, Parildar M, Oran I. Endovascular management of vascular injury during transsphenoidal surgery. Interv Neuroradiol 2013; 19 (01) 102-109
  • 18 Rodríguez-Hernández A, Huang C, Lawton MT. Superior cerebellar artery-posterior cerebral artery bypass: in situ bypass for posterior cerebral artery revascularization. J Neurosurg 2013; 118 (05) 1053-1057
  • 19 Lee CH, Chen SM, Lui TN. Posterior cerebral artery pseudoaneurysm, a rare complication of pituitary tumor transsphenoidal surgery: case report and literature review. World Neurosurg 2015; 84 (05) 1493.e1-1493.e3
  • 20 Morinaga Y, Nii K, Sakamoto K, Inoue R, Mitsutake T, Hanada H. Stent-assisted coil embolization for a ruptured posterior communicating artery pseudoaneurysm after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma. World Neurosurg 2019; 123: 301-305
  • 21 Raymond J, Hardy J, Czepko R, Roy D. Arterial injuries in transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma; the role of angiography and endovascular treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997; 18 (04) 655-665
  • 22 Ghatge SB, Modi DB. Treatment of ruptured ICA during transsphenoidal surgery. Two different endovascular strategies in two cases. Interv Neuroradiol 2010; 16 (01) 31-37
  • 23 Kim BM, Jeon P, Kim DJ, Kim DI, Suh SH, Park KY. Jostent covered stent placement for emergency reconstruction of a ruptured internal carotid artery during or after transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg 2015; 122 (05) 1223-1228
  • 24 Leonardi-Bee J, Bath PM, Phillips SJ, Sandercock PA. IST Collaborative Group. Blood pressure and clinical outcomes in the International Stroke Trial. Stroke 2002; 33 (05) 1315-1320
  • 25 Vemmos KN, Tsivgoulis G, Spengos K. et al. U-shaped relationship between mortality and admission blood pressure in patients with acute stroke. J Intern Med 2004; 255 (02) 257-265
  • 26 Rordorf G, Cramer SC, Efird JT, Schwamm LH, Buonanno F, Koroshetz WJ. Pharmacological elevation of blood pressure in acute stroke. Clinical effects and safety. Stroke 1997; 28 (11) 2133-2138
  • 27 Oskouian RJ, Kelly DF, Laws Jr ERJ. Vascular injury and transsphenoidal surgery. Front Horm Res 2006; 34: 256-278