PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian Journal of Neurosurgery 2021; 10(01): 049-053
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716931
Original Article

Extended Frontobasal Approach for Skull Base Lesions

Mohd Faheem 
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Raj Kumar
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Hanuman Prasad Prajapati 
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India
› Institutsangaben Funding None.
› Weitere Informationen
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background Lesions involving the skull base can be approached by a variety of surgical corridors and extended frontobasal approach is one of them. It provides quite a wide exposure to lesions in the midline of anterior skull base, paranasal sinuses, and sphenoclival region.

Objective To share our experience, and list the merits and demerits, of this approach for anterior skull base lesions.

Methods A total of six cases were operated using extended frontobasal approach. Four of them were skull base tumors with extensive involvement of paranansal sinuses and extension into sellar, parasellar, and clival region. Fronto-orbital and sphenoethmoidal osteotomy provided adequate surgical access, thereby facilitating their excision. Two cases of frontonaso-orbital encephalocele with large bone defect at anterior skull base were also operated upon. Skull base repair was performed using autologous bone graft, pericranium, and fibrin glue.

Results  Gross total excision was achieved in four cases of skull base tumors with good cosmesis as transfacial access was obviated. Excision, repair, and reconstruction of two patients with frontonaso-orbital encephalocele were also done with acceptable cosmesis.

Conclusion The extended frontobasal approach is an excellent alternative for extensive anterior skull base tumors (up to posterior skull base), and also for the repair of large malformative lesions of the anterior skull base.

Keywords

extended frontobasal approach - skull base - paranasal sinuses


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
03. März 2021

© 2021. Neurological Surgeons’ Society of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Sekhar LN, Nanda A, Sen CN, Snyderman CN, Janecka IP. The extended frontal approach to tumors of the anterior, middle, and posterior skull base. J Neurosurg 1992; 76 (02) 198-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Derome P, Akerman M, Anquez L. et al. Les tumeurs sphéno- ethmoïdales. Possibilités d’exérèse et de réparation chirurgi- cales. Neurochirurgie 1972; 18 (Suppl. 01) 161-164
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Gupta SK, Khosla VK, Sharma BS. Bilateral fronto-orbito-zygomatic craniotomy–a combined extended frontal and orbitozygomatic approach. Neurol India 2000; 48 (04) 361-364
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Liu JK, Decker D, Schaefer SD. et al. Zones of approach for craniofacial resection: minimizing facial incisions for resection of anterior cranial base and paranasal sinus tumors. Neurosurgery 2003; 53 (05) 1126-1135, discussion 1135–1137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Smith RR, Klopp CT, Williams JM. Surgical treatment of cancer of the frontal sinus and adjacent areas. Cancer 1954; 7 (05) 991-994
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Raveh J, Laedrach K, Speiser M. et al. The subcranial approach for fronto-orbital and anteroposterior skull-base tumors. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 119 (04) 385-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Raveh J. Neurosurgical forum comments. J Neurosurg 1992; 77: 656
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Georgantopoulou A, Hodgkinson PD, Gerber CJ. Cranial-base surgery: a reconstructive algorithm. Br J Plast Surg 2003; 56 (01) 10-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Frazier CH. An approach to the hypophysis through anterior cranial fossa. Ann Surg 1913; 57 (02) 145-150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Blacklock JB, Weber RS, Lee YY, Goepfert H. Transcranial resection of tumors of the paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity. J Neurosurg 1989; 71 (01) 10-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Jackson IT, Marsh WR, Bite U, Hide TA. Craniofacial osteotomies to facilitate skull base tumour resection. Br J Plast Surg 1986; 39 (02) 153-160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Uttley D, Moore A, Archer DJ. Surgical management of midline skull-base tumors: a new approach. J Neurosurg 1989; 71 (5 Pt 1) 705-710
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Spetzler RF, Herman JM, Beals S, Joganic E, Milligan J. Preservation of olfaction in anterior craniofacial approaches. J Neurosurg 1993; 79 (01) 48-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jones NF, Schramm VL, Sekhar LN. Reconstruction of the cranial base following tumour resection. Br J Plast Surg 1987; 40 (02) 155-162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Safaee MM, McDermott MW, Benet A, Theodosopoulos PV. Tailored extended bifrontal craniotomy for anterior skull base tumors: anatomic description of a modified surgical technique and case series. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2018; 14 (04) 386-394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Honeybul S, Neil-Dwyer D, Lang DA, Evans BT. Extended transbasal approach with preservation of olfaction: ananatomical study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 39 (02) 149-157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar