Semin Thromb Hemost 2021; 47(04): 431-435
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716872
Letter to the Editor

Pulmonary Thrombosis in COVID-19 Treated by Thrombolysis: A Small Case Series Using Streptokinase

Armando Caballero López
1  ICU Department, Arnaldo Milián Castro University Hospital, Santa Clara, Cuba
,
Carlos Herrera Cartaya
1  ICU Department, Arnaldo Milián Castro University Hospital, Santa Clara, Cuba
,
Elibet Chávez González
2  Electrophysiology Department, Cardiocenter Ernesto “Che” Guevara, Santa Clara, Cuba
,
Delvis González Reinoso
3  ICU Department, Manuel “Piti” Fajardo Rivero Hospital, Santa Clara, Cuba
,
Jorge Alain Caballero Font
1  ICU Department, Arnaldo Milián Castro University Hospital, Santa Clara, Cuba
,
Naivi Sánchez Vera
4  Clinical Laboratory, Manuel “Piti” Fajardo Rivero Hospital, Santa Clara, Cuba
,
Mario E. Nápoles Lizano
5  Radiology Department, Cardiocenter Ernesto “Che” Guevara, Santa Clara, Cuba
,
Alexander Vázquez Roque
6  Radiology Department, Celestino Hernández Robau University Hospital, Santa Clara, Cuba
,
Alexis Morales Valdera
7  Internal Medicine, International Clinic of North Keys, Villa Clara, Cuba
,
Tania Crombet Ramos
8  Clinical Immunology Division, Center for Molecular Immunology (CIM), Havana, Cuba
,
Julio Betancourt Cervantes
9  General Surgery Department, Manuel “Piti” Fajardo Rivero Hospital, Santa Clara, Cuba
› Author Affiliations

Cuba has been affected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with more than 2,400 cases diagnosed, 87 deaths, and 3.55% lethality, by July 17, 2020.[1] COVID-19 is a gradually evolving pathology, characterized by a series of stages sustained by different molecular and biological mechanisms. The disease can be divided in at least five different phases: incubation, respiratory, proinflammatory, prothrombotic, and death or remission.[2]

COVID-19 may predispose patients to thrombotic disease, both in venous and arterial circulation, due to excessive inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, platelet activation, and many other prothrombotic factors such as tissue injury, decrease of natural anticoagulants, and stasis.[3] Despite the use of antiviral, anti-inflammatory drugs, anticoagulant therapy, and even invasive mechanical ventilation, many patients progress to a critical stage, characterized by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and shock.[4] We describe here two patients, in whom thrombolysis using recombinant streptokinase[5] was used to treat refractory hypoxemia after suspecting pulmonary micro- and macrothrombotic disease.

Patient 1: A 53-year-old woman with previous history of hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus was admitted at the intensive care unit (ICU) after moderate hypoxemia and respiratory alkalosis. Her initial oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) was 191. Diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection was confirmed with real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on a nasopharyngeal sample. Upon admission, she was receiving treatment with lopinavir/ritonavir, chloroquine, interferon α, and ceftriaxone. She developed several COVID-19 complications including nosocomial respiratory infection (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans), requiring endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Chest X-rays showed interstitial lesions in both lung fields (matching with stage II of physiopathology). She was hence treated with the anti-CD6 antibody itolizumab,[6] which significantly reduced interleukin-6 serum concentration. Patient experienced radiological and clinical improvement, though definitive ventilator weaning was not possible. After three unsuccessful extubation attempts in 15 days, radiological and clinical deterioration developed, including hypotension requiring dobutamine administration at a dose of 20 µg/kg/min. A computer tomography (CT) scan showed ground glass images at both lung fields ([Fig. 1A], [B]). D-dimer was 2.32 µg/mL, PaO2/FiO2 decreased to 100, the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient [D(A-a)O2] was 483, pulmonary shunt fraction (Qs/Qt) ratio was 57.9%, the arterial-venous O2 content difference (Ca-vO2) was 5.14, and the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was 8 cm of water. After the patient respiratory worsening together with the increase in the D-dimer, the ICU's expert committee decided to start thrombolysis with recombinant streptokinase[7] at a dose of 250,000 IU in the first hour followed by 100,000 IU every hour for 24 hours. Streptokinase infusion was only administered for 6 hours due to oral cavity bleeding. Hemorrhage was rapidly controlled after stopping infusion. The use of tranexamic acid was not required. In spite of the premature streptokinase discontinuation, D-dimer values decreased to 0.7 µg/mL (D-dimer units), PaO2/FiO2 raised to 410, blood pressure normalized, and dobutamine could be withdrawn. In parallel, alternative prone (12–16 hours) and supine ventilation (8 hours) was established. After thrombolysis, the fraction of inspired oxygen was reduced (FiO2 = 0.4) and ventilation parameters began to improve: PaO2 was 164 mm Hg and oxygen saturation reached 99.2%. Patient also showed a remarkable clinical and radiological improvement ([Fig. 1C]). Twenty-four hours later, the prone and supine ventilation continued to alternate, the attendance rate of the assistance mechanical ventilator was gradually reduced to 30%, PEEP was decreased to 5 cm of water, and FiO2 to 0.30. In the next 5 days, complete ventilator weaning was achieved. A third CT scan was performed 10 days after the thrombolysis ([Fig. 1D]), showing sustained radiological improvement. After 39 days in ICU, the patient was transferred to hospital conventional ward to continue pulmonary and neuromuscular rehabilitation.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Patient 1. (A, B) Multislice computed tomography (CT) scan before thrombolysis: Ground glass images are observed in both lung fields, with small areas of hyperlucency toward the vertex. (C) Multislice CT image performed 48 hours after thrombolysis, with clear tomographic improvement. (D) Multislice CT image performed 7 days after thrombolysis, where the tomographic improvement becomes more evident.

Patient 2: An 86-year-old man with a personal history of essential hypertension, generalized atherosclerosis, and cognitive disorder, was admitted at the “Celestino Hernandez Robau” University Hospital of Santa Clara. Upon admission, RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 was positive on a nasopharyngeal sample and the patient showed polypnea (32 rotations per minute) and ancillary respiratory musculature use for breathing. His blood pressure was 90/60 mm Hg. He was hence treated according the Cuban national protocol including chloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) (cytoprotective dose), and low molecular weight heparin (fraxiparine), at 0.6 IU every 12 hours. EPO was included in the protocol for COVID-19 considering its cytoprotective capacity including anti-ischemic, antiapoptotic, and regenerative effect in several tissues such as the lung, kidney, heart, nervous system, retina, pancreas, and endothelial cells. EPO acts through a special receptor, EPOR-βcR, which mediated its protective effects in critically ill patients and following trauma.[8] Patient also received CIGB258,[9] a peptide with immune-regulatory properties, as part of an expanded access protocol. Despite treatment, patient suffered COVID-19 complications including nosocomial respiratory infection (Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated in blood culture and bronchial secretions) requiring antibiotic therapy, endotracheal intubation, and mechanical ventilation. The initial evaluation of the arterial blood gases showed severe hypoxemia with PaO2/FiO2 of 68. Chest X-rays showed interstitial lesions in both lung fields. Ventilator was used in volume-control mode, PEEP was adjusted to 10 cm of water, and FiO2 was 0.60. Urine output gradually decreased, creatinine reached 224 μmol/mL, glomerular filtration rate was 20.59 mL/min, and patient showed signs of hypovolemia. Due to these hemodynamic changes, treatment with norepinephrine (0.2 µg/kg/min) and dobutamine (10 μg/kg/min) was initiated. Patient also had radiologic and respiratory worsening, including tracheobronchial secretions and leukocytosis of 18.0 × 109/L. X-rays showed triangular images at the base of the right lung suggestive of pulmonary infarction or pulmonary thromboembolism. A PaO2 of 58 mm Hg and PaO2/FiO2 of 96, forced to keep FiO2 high (0.8) and to start maneuvers of alveolar recruitment. PEEP was increased to 12 cm of water, CIGB-258 dose augmented, and alternating prone and supine ventilation started. As a result, oxygen saturation improved to 98 to 99%. However, after an elevated D-dimer (8 µg/mL; D-dimer units), arterial hypotension, D(A-a)O2 of 486, and Qs/Qt of 57% together with a significant clinical-radiological worsening, thrombolysis was proposed as therapeutic alternative. At that point, a confirmatory CT scan of the pulmonary thrombosis or microthrombosis was not feasible, due to the patient's extreme poor condition. Thrombolysis with recombinant streptokinase[5] at 250,000 IU for 1 hour followed by 100,000 IU every 1 hour for 24 hours was planned. Streptokinase administration was interrupted due to onset of oral and endotracheal bleeding that was rapidly contained with tranexamic acid (1.0 g). Shortly after and even though the full streptokinase dose was not administered, a remarkable clinical and radiological improvement occurred; PaO2 increased to 79.2 mm Hg and PaO2/FiO2 raised to 158. Seventy-two hours after thrombolysis, a CT scan (120-slice) combined with a dual energy CT scan, was performed ([Fig. 2]). Patient subsequently had negative RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 on a nasopharyngeal sample, 15 days after admission. CT scan showed areas of pulmonary infarcts, microthrombi, and diffuse inflammatory lesions of both lung bases. After initial improvement, a persistent multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated from the respiratory secretion. At that time, he had received therapy with meronem, colistina, and piperacillin-tazobactam. Patient had progressive radiological and clinical worsening associated with severe bronchopneumonia. The patient remained ventilated and unresponsive to any of the antibiotic schemes used. He died 40 days after his admission in the hospital and 25 days after thrombolysis. Death was attributed to septic shock. Necropsy was not performed.

Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Patient 2. (A) Multislice computerized axial tomography (120 cuts), with dual energy tomographic views, showing a zone of pulmonary infarction (black) at the base of the right and left lung. Thrombus zone with laterobasal ischemia of the left lung (violet) and multiple and small areas of purplish color, pulmonary microthrombi, in both lung fields predominate on the right side. (B) Anterior view of multiplanar airways, with black areas of pulmonary infarcts and diffuse inflammatory lesions of both lung bases. (C) Another anterior view of axial tomography computed with dual energy, with pulmonary infarcts (black) and areas of diffuse inflammatory lesions predominantly of the lower lobes. (D) Computerized axial tomography, shaggy aorta with diffuse atheromatosis in all segments of the aorta.

Patients admitted to the ICU for COVID-19, following an infection by the SARS-CoV-2, have a considerably increased risk of thrombotic events, both arterial and venous.[4]

SARS-CoV-1 and -2 show tropism for angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 on type II pneumocytes.[10] This tropism, along with the close anatomical juxtaposition of type II pneumocytes and pulmonary vascular network, together with a severe inflammatory reaction, is likely to drive the generalized pulmonary hypercoagulable state seen in patients with COVID-19.[10] Development of hypoxemia, secondary to ARDS induced by COVID-19 might also activate the coagulation cascade and could be important in endothelial dysfunction beyond the capillary network.[3]

Although the number of postmortem pathologic reports are limited, Luo et al described vascular wall thickening, stenosis of the vascular lumen, and microthrombus formation accompanying the findings of ARDS.[11] Similar pathologic findings are found in small vessels of other organs.[12] [13] [14] Ackermann et al reported that alveolar capillary microthrombi were more prevalent in patients with COVID-19 than in patients with influenza.[15] The frequency of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients with COVID-19, including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is becoming better understood, ranging from 25 to 27% in recent publications.[16] [17] Besides these pathology findings, many physicians have reported D-dimer elevation in COVID-19 patients, mainly in those bearing severe and critical disease.[18] Although D-dimer is not a specific indicator of thrombosis, in combination with other parameters, its elevation may suggest a systemic coagulation activation with increased thrombin generation and fibrinolysis.[19]

Here, we present the results of the first two Cuban patients carrying COVID-19, in whom thrombolysis was attempted (considering their extreme severity, their refractory hypoxemia, and high suspicion of micro- and macrothrombosis).

A few reports on thrombolysis for COVID-19, using tissue plasminogen activator as a thrombolytic agent, have been published.[20] Our two patients were treated with recombinant streptokinase, which has been the thrombolytic of choice to treat coronary thrombosis and pulmonary or peripheral venous macrothrombi in Cuba.[5] [7] Both patients had hemorrhagic complications that precluded administering the full dose. Other thrombolytic agents are unavailable in Cuba.

Confirming multiple pulmonary microthrombi is challenging. In COVID-19, clinical and laboratory manifestations can raise the index of diagnostic suspicion. A thoracic angio-tomography can confirm a diagnosis of pulmonary thromboembolism of thick or medium branches or multiple pulmonary microthrombi disseminated in both lung fields. A multislice CT with dual energy has the potential to improve the detection of pulmonary thrombosis.[21]

We hence conclude that the two patients took some advantages from the thrombolysis, since this therapeutic strategy was effective to improve their respiratory function and chest images. Unfortunately, one patient died due to septic respiratory complications. In both cases, rescue thrombolysis was done on compassionate basis after interdisciplinary discussion. We advise, however, that this procedure should not be done routinely unless in the setting of a clinical trial.

Bleeding occurred in both cases but was controlled after stopping infusion or with the use of tranexamic acid. We therefore believe that thrombolysis might be a valuable alternative for COVID-19 patients with pulmonary micro- or macrothrombosis that have failed anti-inflammatory and anticoagulant therapy. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of thrombolysis for COVID-19 patients should be confirmed in randomized clinical trials.



Publication History

Publication Date:
30 December 2020 (online)

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA