CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 25(03): e443-e445
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715151
Original Research

Tympanic Membrane Retractions in patients with Williams Syndrome: A Controlled Study

1   Department of Otolaryngology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
,
2   Department of Morphological Sciences, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
3   Santa Casa de Misericordia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
,
4   School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
,
5   Department of Genetics, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
,
1   Department of Otolaryngology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction The role of elastin in tympanic retractions and chronic otitis media is not well established. Williams Syndrome (WS), a pathology related to a mutation in the elastin gene, could generate tympanic retractions.

Objective To compare the prevalence of tympanic retractions among patients with WS and controls.

Methods WS patients (n = 43 ears) and controls (n = 130 ears) were evaluated by digital otoscopic examination and the degree of tympanic membrane retraction was classified by 2 blinded experienced otolaryngologists.

Results The agreement rate between the evaluators was 71.1% for pars tensa and 65% for pars flaccida retraction (p < 0.001). The pars tensa and pars flaccida retractions are present in patients with WS after an adjusted residue of respectively - 2.8 and - 2.6 (p = 0.011 and p = 0.022) compared with controls.

Conclusions Tympanic membrane retractions are not more common in the WS group when compared with controls.



Publication History

Received: 08 April 2020

Accepted: 25 June 2020

Article published online:
15 October 2020

© 2020. Fundação Otorrinolaringologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • References

  • 1 Ars BM. Tympanic membrane retraction pockets. Etiology, pathogeny, treatment. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 1991; 45 (03) 265-277
  • 2 Yoon TH, Schachern PA, Paparella MM, Aeppli DM. Pathology and pathogenesis of tympanic membrane retraction. Am J Otolaryngol 1990; 11 (01) 10-17
  • 3 Tos M, Stangerup SE, Larsen P. Dynamics of eardrum changes following secretory otitis. A prospective study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987; 113 (04) 380-385
  • 4 Tos M. Upon the relationship between secretory otitis in childhood and chronic otitis and its sequelae in adults. J Laryngol Otol 1981; 95 (10) 1011-1022
  • 5 Ruah CB, Schachern PA, Zelterman D, Paparella MM, Yoon TH. Age-related morphologic changes in the human tympanic membrane. A light and electron microscopic study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 117 (06) 627-634
  • 6 Ruah CB, Schachern PA, Paparella MM, Zelterman D. Mechanisms of retraction pocket formation in the pediatric tympanic membrane. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992; 118 (12) 1298-1305
  • 7 Yan SD, Qiu ZM, Zhou NS. Ultrastructure of the secondary tympanic membrane in the human fetus. Acta Anat (Basel) 1988; 131 (04) 332-337
  • 8 Chole RA, Kodama K. Comparative histology of the tympanic membrane and its relationship to cholesteatoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989; 98 (10) 761-766
  • 9 Sadé J, Avraham S, Brown M. Atelectasis, retraction pockets and cholesteatoma. Acta Otolaryngol 1981; 92 (5-6): 501-512
  • 10 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33 (01) 159-174