CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2021; 82(S 01): S14-S15
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714406
Skull Base: Operative Videos

Endonasal Odontoidectomy in Basilar Invagination

Juan A. Simal-Julián
1   Neurosurgery Service, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe Valencia, Valencia, Spain
,
Pablo Miranda-Lloret
1   Neurosurgery Service, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe Valencia, Valencia, Spain
,
Maria R. Sanchis-Martín
2   Department of Anaesthesiology, H General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
,
Arnold Quiroz
1   Neurosurgery Service, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe Valencia, Valencia, Spain
,
Carlos Botella-Asunción
1   Neurosurgery Service, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe Valencia, Valencia, Spain
,
Amin B. Kassam
3   Aurora Neuroscience Innovation Institute, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective The endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy (EEO) is emerging as a feasible surgical alternative to conventional microscopic transoral approach. In this article, we show EEO in the basilar invagination (BI) and describe in detail the technical aspects, advantages, and disadvantages of this approach ([Fig. 1]).

Methods We describe EEO using audiovisual material from the neurosurgical department of Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe Valencia database.

Results We present the case of a 61-year-old male patient with BI. Initially, we performed suboccipital decompression and occipitocervical fusion. Subsequently, after a no significant neurological improvement and persistent anterior compression, EEO was performed. The postoperative evolution was uneventful and the preoperative neurological deficits were recovered rapidly after surgery

Discussion EEO technique enables complete odontoid resection, preventing invasion of aggressive oral bacterial flora, and it is not limited by the mouth opening. As well, it avoids manipulation of the soft palate, therefore evades the risk of velopalatal insufficiency, facilitates immediate oral tolerance, and early extubation. The rostral position of C1–C2 complex in BI could suppose a great advantage in favor the endonasal approaches. Mucoperichondrial vascularized flaps could be obtained to avoid a postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and facilitate the reepithelization process of the surgical bed.

Conclusion EEO may provide a significant anatomic and technical advantage over the trans-oral approach.

The link to the video can be found at: https://youtu.be/Td6MDcjCNKk.



Publication History

Received: 18 February 2019

Accepted: 08 March 2020

Article published online:
02 December 2020

© 2020. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany