PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian Journal of Neurosurgery 2021; 10(01): 037-041
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714302
Original Article

Nontraumatic Nonaneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Risk Factors, Complications, and Clinical Outcomes

Ehsan Alimohammadi
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Imam Reza Hospital, Kermanshah, Iran
,
Paniz Ahadi
2   Clinical Research Development Center of Taleghani and Imam Ali Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
,
Ali Karbasforoushan
3   Department of Anesthesiology, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Imam Reza Hospital, Kermanshah, Iran
,
Shamsoddin Rahmani
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Imam Reza Hospital, Kermanshah, Iran
,
Seyed Reza Bagheri
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Imam Reza Hospital, Kermanshah, Iran
,
Alireza Abdi
4   Nursing and Midwifery School, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Imam Reza Hospital, Kermanshah, Iran
› Institutsangaben Funding None.
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background The present study aimed to investigate the risk factors, complications, and clinical outcomes of patients with nontraumatic, nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (NNSAH).

Methods We retrospectively evaluated 78 consecutive patients with NNSAH admitted to our center between April 2009 and April 2019. Patients were divided into two groups based on the distribution of blood in the CT scan, perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage ( PM-SAH) and nonperimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage (nPM-SAH) groups. The outcome was assessed according to the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS). The demographic data and clinical records including age, sex, smoking history, hypertension, diabetes, history of anticoagulant medication, Glasgow coma score (GCS), Hunt–Hess (HH) grades, and in-hospital complications and clinical outcomes were retrospectively reviewed and compared between the two groups.

Results There were 45 patients (57.69%) in the PM-SAH group and 33 cases (42.30%) in the nPM-SAH group with the mean age of 53.98 ± 7.7 years. There were no significant differences between the two groups based on age, sex, smoking history, diabetes, hypertension, anticoagulation medication history, and HH grade at admission. The nPM-SAH group was significantly associated with a higher incidence of radiological and clinical vasospasm (p < 0.05). Moreover, the need for external ventricular drainage (EVD) placement because of the development of hydrocephalus was significantly higher in the nPM group (p < 0.05). Patients with PM-SAH had better clinical outcomes than those with nPM-SAH (p = 0.037).

Conclusions Our results showed that patients with nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (NSAH) had favorable clinical outcomes. The PM group had better clinical outcomes and lower complication rates in comparison with the nPM group. Repeated digital subtraction angiography (DSA) examinations are strongly recommended for patients with nPM-SAH.

Keywords

nontraumatic nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage - digital subtraction angiography - perimesencephalic - nonperimesencephalic - Glasgow outcome scale


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
27. November 2020

© 2020. Neurological Surgeons’ Society of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Khan AA, Smith JD, Kirkman MA. et al. Angiogram negative subarachnoid haemorrhage: outcomes and the role of repeat angiography. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013; 115 (08) 1470-1475
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bruder N. [Non-aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2007; 26 (11) 954-958
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Akcakaya MO, Aydoseli A, Aras Y. et al. Clinical course of non-traumatic non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a single institution experience over 10 years and review of the contemporary literature. Turk Neurosurg 2017; 27 (05) 732-742
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Konczalla J, Platz J, Schuss P, Vatter H, Seifert V, Güresir E. Non-aneurysmal non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage: patient characteristics, clinical outcome and prognostic factors based on a single-center experience in 125 patients. BMC Neurol 2014; 14: 140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Pyysalo LM, Niskakangas TT, Keski-Nisula LH, Kähärä VJ, Öhman JE. Long term outcome after subarachnoid haemorrhage of unknown aetiology. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2011; 82 (11) 1264-1266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 van der Schaaf IC, Velthuis BK, Gouw A, Rinkel GJ. Venous drainage in perimesencephalic hemorrhage. Stroke 2004; 35 (07) 1614-1618
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 McMahon J, Dorsch N. Subarachnoid haemorrhage of unknown aetiology: what next?. Crit Rev Neurosurg 1999; 9 (03) 147-155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Jabbarli R, Reinhard M, Roelz R. et al. Outcome prediction after non-aneurysmal non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. Curr Neurovasc Res 2015; 12 (03) 269-276
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Xu L, Fang Y, Shi X. et al. Management of spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage patients with negative initial digital subtraction angiogram findings: conservative or aggressive?. BioMed Res Int 2017; 2017: 2486859
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Reynolds MR, Blackburn SL, Zipfel GJ. Recurrent idiopathic perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 2011; 115 (03) 612-616
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Wallace AN, Vyhmeister R, Dines JN. et al. Evaluation of an anatomic definition of non-aneurysmal perimesencephalic subarachnhoid hemorrhage. J Neurointerv Surg 2016; 8 (04) 378-385
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Teasdale GM, Pettigrew LE, Wilson JT, Murray G, Jennett B. Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: a review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurotrauma 1998; 15 (08) 587-597
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kong Y, Zhang JH, Qin X. Perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage: risk factors, clinical presentations, and outcome. In Early Brain Injury or Cerebral Vasospasm 2011 (pp. 197–201). Vienna: Springer;
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Du CP, Ke KF. [The clinical analysis of nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage]. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi 2011; 50 (05) 408-410
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kapadia A, Schweizer TA, Spears J, Cusimano M, Macdonald RL. Nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage: diagnosis, pathophysiology, clinical characteristics, and long-term outcome. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 (06) 1131-1143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Andaluz N, Zuccarello M. Yield of further diagnostic work-up of cryptogenic subarachnoid hemorrhage based on bleeding patterns on computed tomographic scans. Neurosurgery 2008; 62 (05) 1040-1046, discussion 1047
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Beseoglu K, Pannes S, Steiger HJ, Hänggi D. Long-term outcome and quality of life after nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010; 152 (03) 409-416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Ruigrok YM, Rinkel GJ, Buskens E. Velthuis BK, van Gijn J. Perimesencephalic hemorrhage and CT angiography: A decision analysis. Stroke 2000; 31 (12) 2976-2983
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Velthuis BK, Rinkel GJ, Ramos LM. Witkamp TD, van Leeuwen MS. Perimesencephalic hemorrhage. Exclusion of vertebrobasilar aneurysms with CT angiography. Stroke 1999; 30 (05) 1103-1109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Whiting J, Reavey-Cantwell J, Velat G. et al. Clinical course of nontraumatic, nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a single-institution experience. Neurosurg Focus 2009; 26 (05) E21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Boswell S, Thorell W, Gogela S, Lyden E, Surdell D. Angiogram-negative subarachnoid hemorrhage: outcomes data and review of the literature. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013; 22 (06) 750-757
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Topcuoglu MA, Ogilvy CS, Carter BS, Buonanno FS, Koroshetz WJ, Singhal AB. Subarachnoid hemorrhage without evident cause on initial angiography studies: diagnostic yield of subsequent angiography and other neuroimaging tests. J Neurosurg 2003; 98 (06) 1235-1240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Van Calenbergh F, Plets C, Goffin J, Velghe L. Nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: prevalence of perimesencephalic hemorrhage in a consecutive series. Surg Neurol 1993; 39 (04) 320-323
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Maslehaty H, Petridis AK, Barth H, Mehdorn HM. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in perimesencephalic and nonperimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage of unknown origin. J Neurosurg 2011; 114 (04) 1003-1007
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Germans MR, Coert BA, Majoie CB. van den Berg R, Verbaan D, Vandertop WP. Spinal axis imaging in non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective cohort study. J Neurol 2014; 261 (11) 2199-2203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Germans MR, Coert BA, Majoie CB. et al. Yield of spinal imaging in nonaneurysmal, nonperimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology 2015; 84 (13) 1337-1340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar