Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2020; 14(03): 380-385
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713953
Original Article

In vitro Simulation of Periodontal Ligament in Fatigue Testing of Dental Crowns

Noor Nawafleh
1   Department of Applied Dental Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
,
Abdel Raheem Bibars
1   Department of Applied Dental Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
,
Shareen Elshiyab
1   Department of Applied Dental Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
,
Yasmeen Janzeer
1   Department of Applied Dental Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective Fatigue testing of restorative material has been appreciated as an appropriate method to evaluate dental restorations. This study aims to investigate the influence of periodontal ligament (PDL) simulation on fatigue and fracture tests results of zirconia crowns.

Materials and Methods A standard tooth preparation for all ceramic zirconia crown was made on a typodont mandibular molar. The prepared master die was duplicated using epoxy resin to produce 40 replicas. PDL simulation was made by surrounding the root of 20 dies with a 0.3-mm thick silicon layer. The other 20 specimens had no PDL simulation. Zirconia crowns were fabricated using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technology and cemented to the epoxy resin dies. Ten crowns from each group were subject to chewing simulation with simultaneous thermocycling (5–55°C). All specimens were then loaded until failure in universal testing machine.

Statistical Analysis Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software. Shapiro–Wilk test confirmed the normal distribution of data. Descriptive statistic was performed and differences between the groups were analyzed using paired samples t-test.

Results All fatigued crowns survived chewing simulation; no failure was observed after finishing simulation. The highest mean fracture load recorded was 3,987 ± 400 N for the no fatigue/no periodontal simulation group. Comparing the mean fracture load of the two groups with periodontal simulation and the two groups with no periodontal simulation showed no statistically significant difference (p > 0.5).

Conclusion Considering the testing set-up applied in this study, simulating PDL using resilient materials does not affect the in vitro survival and fracture resistance of zirconia crowns.

Keywords

chewing simulation - fatigue - fracture resistance - periodontal ligament - zirconia crown


Publication History

Article published online:
09 July 2020

© .

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Rosentritt M, Behr M, Preis V. A critical evaluation of fatigue studies for restorative materials in dentistry. Curr Oral Health Rep 2016; 3: 221-228
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Alqahtani F, AlAmar M. In vitro comparison of modes of failures among titanium and one-and two-piece zirconia abutment under static load. Eur J Dent 2020; 14 (01) 157-160
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kelly JR, Benetti P, Rungruanganunt P, Bona AD. The slippery slope: critical perspectives on in vitro research methodologies. Dent Mater 2012; 28 (01) 41-51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Naumann M, Metzdorf G, Fokkinga W. et al. Influence of test parameters on in vitro fracture resistance of post-endodontic restorations: a structured review. J Oral Rehabil 2009; 36 (04) 299-312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Denry I, Holloway J. Ceramics for dental applications: a review. Materials (Basel) 2010; 3: 351-368
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Heintze SD, Albrecht T, Cavalleri A, Steiner M. A new method to test the fracture probability of all-ceramic crowns with a dual-axis chewing simulator. Dent Mater 2011; 27 (02) e10-e19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Rosentritt M, Siavikis G, Behr M, Kolbeck C, Handel G. Approach for valuating the significance of laboratory simulation. J Dent 2008; 36 (12) 1048-1053
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Seydler B, Rues S, Müller D, Schmitter M. In vitro fracture load of monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic molar crowns with different wall thicknesses. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18 (04) 1165-1171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Moradi Z, Abbasi M, Khalesi R, Tabatabaei MH, Shahidi Z. Fracture toughness comparison of three indirect composite resins using 4-point flexural strength method. Eur J Dent 2020; DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1708438.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Rosentritt M, Behr M, Gebhard R, Handel G. Influence of stress simulation parameters on the fracture strength of all-ceramic fixed-partial dentures. Dent Mater 2006; 22 (02) 176-182
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kelly JR. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81 (06) 652-661
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kelly JR, Cesar PF, Scherrer SS. et al. ADM guidance-ceramics: fatigue principles and testing. Dent Mater 2017; 33 (11) 1192-1204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Lohbauer U, Krämer N, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Correlation of in vitro fatigue data and in vivo clinical performance of a glassceramic material. Dent Mater 2008; 24 (01) 39-44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Nawafleh N, Hatamleh M, Elshiyab S, Mack F. Lithium disilicate restorations fatigue testing parameters: a systematic review. J Prosthodont 2016; 25 (02) 116-126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Nawafleh N, Bibars AR, Al Twal E, Öchsner A. Influence of antagonist material on fatigue and fracture resistance of zirconia crowns. Eur J Dent 2020; DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1708228.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Brosh T, Porat N, Vardimon AD, Pilo R. Appropriateness of viscoelastic soft materials as in vitro simulators of the periodontal ligament. J Oral Rehabil 2011; 38 (12) 929-939
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Rosentritt M, Behr M, Scharnagl P, Handel G, Kolbeck C. Influence of resilient support of abutment teeth on fracture resistance of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2011; 24 (05) 465-468
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Akkayan B, Gülmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87 (04) 431-437
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Newman MP, Yaman P, Dennison J, Rafter M, Billy E. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89 (04) 360-367
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Le Bell-Rönnlöf AM, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH. Fracture behavior of structurally compromised non-vital maxillary premolars restored using experimental fiber reinforced composite crowns. Am J Dent 2006; 19 (06) 326-332
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Attia A, Kern M. Influence of cyclic loading and luting agents on the fracture load of two all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92 (06) 551-556
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Forberger N, Göhring TN. Influence of the type of post and core on in vitro marginal continuity, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of lithia disilicate-based all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 100 (04) 264-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Schultheis S, Strub JR, Gerds TA, Guess PC. Monolithic and bi-layer CAD/CAM lithium-disilicate versus metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: comparison of fracture loads and failure modes after fatigue. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17 (05) 1407-1413
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Carvalho AO, Bruzi G, Giannini M, Magne P. Fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM complete crowns with a simplified cementation process. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 111 (04) 310-317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Zhao K, Wei Y-R, Pan Y, Zhang X-P, Swain MV, Guess PC. Influence of veneer and cyclic loading on failure behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic molar crowns. Dent Mater 2014; 30 (02) 164-171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 AlZahrani F, Richards L. Micro-CT evaluation of a novel periodontal ligament simulation technique for dental experimental models. Arch Orofac Sci 2018; 13: 93-103
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Soares CJ, Pizi ECG, Fonseca RB, Martins LRM. Influence of root embedment material and periodontal ligament simulation on fracture resistance tests. Braz Oral Res 2005; 19 (01) 11-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Marchionatti AME, Wandscher VF, Broch J. et al. Influence of periodontal ligament simulation on bond strength and fracture resistance of roots restored with fiber posts. J Appl Oral Sci 2014; 22 (05) 450-458
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Zellweger G, Büchler A, Zappini G. Fracture frequency of all-ceramic crowns during dynamic loading in a chewing simulator using different loading and luting protocols. Dent Mater 2008; 24 (10) 1352-1361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Aboushelib MN. Simulation of cumulative damage associated with long term cyclic loading using a multi-level strain accommodating loading protocol. Dent Mater 2013; 29 (02) 252-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Aversa R, Apicella D, Perillo L. et al. Non-linear elastic three-dimensional finite element analysis on the effect of endocrown material rigidity on alveolar bone remodeling process. Dent Mater 2009; 25 (05) 678-690
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Fill TS, Toogood RW, Major PW, Carey JP. Analytically determined mechanical properties of, and models for the periodontal ligament: critical review of literature. J Biomech 2012; 45 (01) 9-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Meira JB, Jikihara AN, Capetillo P, Roscoe MG, Cattaneo PM, Ballester RY. Finite element analysis in dentistry. Dent Biomater 2018; 2: 67
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Hu YH, Pang LC, Hsu CC, Lau YH. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated anterior teeth restored with four post-and-core systems. Quintessence Int 2003; 34 (05) 349-353
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Heintze SD, Monreal D, Reinhardt M. et al. Fatigue resistance of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures - fatigue tests and finite element analysis. Dent Mater 2018; 34 (03) 494-507
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar