Facial Plast Surg 2020; 36(04): 358-375
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713842
Original Article

Deep-Plane Approach to the Vertical Platysma Advancement: Technical Modifications and Nuances over 25 Years

Neil A. Gordon
1   Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
2   New England Surgical Center, The Retreat at Split Rock, Wilton, Connecticut
,
Tareq G. Sawan
1   Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

In this article, we will provide the reader with the anatomical and embryologic evidence supporting the use of the deep-plane approach in rhytidectomy and insight into the evolution of the technique into the vertical platysma advancement. The original description of the deep-plane technique only described a basic superficial muscular aponeurotic system dissection in the midface with the ability to use tension on the flap without aesthetic consequences. This plane of dissection provides additional advantages not previously described, including access to deeper anatomical structures such as the buccal fat pad, and allows in vivo assessment and treatment of jowling. We describe how extension of this dissection and selective release of facial ligaments allows us to optimize treatment outcomes and longevity, especially in cases of difficult anatomy or revisions. Further advancements include case-specific facial volume enhancement, created by complex flap design, and facial narrowing by preauricular contouring and parotid hypertrophy treatment. Insights into anatomical landmarks, technical nuances, and alternative approaches for facial variations are presented.



Publication History

Article published online:
31 August 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers
333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

 
  • References

  • 1 Gordon NA, Toman J. Illusion of volume loss. Facial Plast Surg 2015; 31 (01) 80-87
  • 2 Tower J, Seifert K, Paskhover B. Longitudinal analysis of superficial midfacial fat volumes over a 10-year period. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2018; 42 (04) 995-1001
  • 3 Tower JI, Seifert K, Paskhover B. Patterns of superficial midfacial fat volume distribution differ by age and body mass index. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2019; 43 (01) 83-90
  • 4 Skoog T. New Methods and Refinements in Plastic Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1974
  • 5 Mitz V, Peyronie M. The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976; 58 (01) 80-88
  • 6 Hamra ST. Composite rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90 (01) 1-13
  • 7 Hamra ST. The deep-plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86 (01) 53-61 , discussion 62–63
  • 8 Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The fat compartments of the face: anatomy and clinical implications for cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (07) 2219-2227 , discussion 2228–2231
  • 9 Litner JA, Adamson PA. Limited vs extended face-lift techniques: objective analysis of intraoperative results. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006; 8 (03) 186-190
  • 10 Rees TD, Liverett DM, Guy CL. The effect of cigarette smoking on skin-flap survival in the face lift patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73 (06) 911-915
  • 11 Gordon NA, Rosenberg R. Deep plane rhytidectomy: technical modifications, nuances, and observations, a 17 year experience [Master's seminars]. Presented at the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Annual Meeting, September 5, 2012, Washington, DC
  • 12 Barton Jr FE. Rhytidectomy and the nasolabial fold. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90 (04) 601-607
  • 13 Gordon NA. Revision rhytidectomy: technique, modifications, and indications. Presented at the 10th International Symposium on Facial Plastic Surgery & American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, April 29, 2010, Hollywood, FL
  • 14 Owsley JQ, Fiala TG. Update: lifting the malar fat pad for correction of prominent nasolabial folds. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (03) 715-722
  • 15 Yousif NJ, Gosain A, Matloub HS, Sanger JR, Madiedo G, Larson DL. The nasolabial fold: an anatomic and histologic reappraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (01) 60-69
  • 16 Paul MD, Calvert JW, Evans GR. The evolution of the midface lift in aesthetic plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (06) 1809-1827
  • 17 Matarasso A. Pseudoherniation of the buccal fat pad: a new clinical syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (03) 723-730 , discussion 731–736
  • 18 Zhang H-M, Yan Y-P, Qi K-M, Wang J-Q, Liu Z-F. Anatomical structure of the buccal fat pad and its clinical adaptations. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (07) 2509-2518 , discussion 2519–2520
  • 19 Mendelson BC, Tutino R. Submandibular gland reduction in aesthetic surgery of the neck: review of 112 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (03) 463-471
  • 20 Whetzel TP, Mathes SJ. The arterial supply of the face lift flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (02) 480-486 , discussion 487–488
  • 21 Jacono AA, Alemi AS, Russell JL. A meta-analysis of complication rates among different SMAS facelift techniques. Aesthet Surg J 2019; 39 (09) 927-942
  • 22 Parikh SS, Jacono AA. Deep-plane face-lift as an alternative in the smoking patient. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011; 13 (04) 283-285
  • 23 Kamer FM, Song AU. Hematoma formation in deep plane rhytidectomy. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2000; 2 (04) 240-242