PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Rep 2020; 09(01): e29-e32
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713731
Case Report: Cardiac
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Successful Treatment of Driveline Infection with Vacuum-Assisted Closure Therapy and Instillation Therapy

Juliane Kilo
1   Department of Cardiac Surgery, Regional University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
,
Julia Dumfarth
1   Department of Cardiac Surgery, Regional University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
,
Daniel Höfer
1   Department of Cardiac Surgery, Regional University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
,
Michael Grimm
1   Department of Cardiac Surgery, Regional University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

03. September 2019

22. Dezember 2019

Publikationsdatum:
12. Oktober 2020 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background Driveline infection is a serious complication in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients. We report the case of a patient who was successfully treated by combining instillation and vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy.

Case Description A 65-year-old LVAD patient presented with recurrent driveline infection. Local therapy with VAC therapy in combination with instillation of polyhexanide was performed for 2 weeks. The patient remains free from infection for twelve months by now.

Conclusion This case is the first to present the combination of polyhexanide instillation with VAC as treatment for driveline infection. This therapy may thus be an option for patients who lack any other surgical option.

Keywords

circulatory assist devices - wound infection - surgery - complications
 

  • References

  • 1 Pavlovic NV, Randell T, Madeira T, Hsu S, Zinoviev R, Abshire M. Risk of left ventricular assist device driveline infection: a systematic literature review. Heart Lung 2019; 48 (02) 90-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Chahal D, Sepehry AA, Nazzari H, Wright AJ, Toma M. The impact of left ventricular assist device infections on postcardiac transplant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ASAIO J 2019; 65 (08) 827-836
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kurihara C, Nishimura T, Kinoshita O. , et al. Successful treatment of mediastinitis after ventricular assist device implantation with rerouting of the outflow vascular prosthesis. J Artif Organs 2011; 14 (02) 155-158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kimura M, Nishimura T, Kinoshita O. , et al. Successful treatment of pump pocket infection after left ventricular assist device implantation by negative pressure wound therapy and omental transposition. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 20 (Suppl): 842-845
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Walter V, Stock UA, Soriano-Romero M, Schnitzbauer A, Moritz A, Beiras-Fernandez A. Eradication of a chronic wound and driveline infection after redo-LVAD implantation. J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 9: 63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Yu AW, Rippel RA, Smock E, Jarral OA. In patients with post-sternotomy mediastinitis is vacuum-assisted closure superior to conventional therapy?. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2013; 17 (05) 861-865
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Baradarian S, Stahovich M, Krause S, Adamson R, Dembitsky W. Case series: clinical management of persistent mechanical assist device driveline drainage using vacuum-assisted closure therapy. ASAIO J 2006; 52 (03) 354-356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lehner B, Fleischmann W, Becker R, Jukema GN. First experiences with negative pressure wound therapy and instillation in the treatment of infected orthopaedic implants: a clinical observational study. Int Orthop 2011; 35 (09) 1415-1420
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Idris A, Hart A, Branam S, Guglin M. VeraFlo negative pressure wound therapy with household bleach for refractory driveline infection in a patient with left ventricular assist device. VAD J 2015; 1: 1-10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar