CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 25(03): e392-e398
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1712105
Original Research

Middle Cranial Fossa Approach: The Incudomalleolar Joint as a Reliable Landmark

1   Department of Otolaryngology, Baqai Medical University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
,
2   Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia
,
3   Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University , Durham, NC, United States
4   Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
,
5   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction The middle cranial fossa approach is performed by fewer neurotologists owing to a reduced number of indications. Consistent landmarks are mandatory to guide the surgeon in a narrow field.

Objectives We have evaluated the incus and malleus head and the incudomalleal joint (IMJ) as a key landmark for identifying the superior semicircular canal (SSC) and to get oriented along the floor of the middle cranial fossa.

Methods A combination of 20 temporal bone dissections and CT imaging were utilized to test and describe these landmarks.

Results The blue line of the SSC is consistently identified along the prolongation of a virtual line through the IMJ and the angulation toward the root of zygoma. The mean distance from the zygoma toward the IMJ ranged from 1.60 to 1.90cm. Once the IMJ was identified, the blue line of the SSC was consistently found along the virtual line through the IMJ within 5 to 9mm.

Conclusions The IMJ is a safe and consistent anatomical marker in the surgical approach to the middle cranial fossa floor. Opening the tegmen 1.5 to 2cm medial to the root of the zygoma and identifying the joint allows to trace a virtual line toward the SSC within 5 to 9mm. Knowledge of the close relationship between the direction of the IMJ and the superior canal can be used in all transtemporal approaches, thus orienting the surgeon in a rather narrow field with limited retraction of the dura and brain.



Publication History

Received: 03 November 2019

Accepted: 19 March 2020

Article published online:
24 September 2020

© 2020. Fundação Otorrinolaringologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • References

  • 1 Yetiser S. Total facial nerve decompression for severe traumatic facial nerve paralysis: a review of 10 cases. Int J of Otolaryngol. Volume 2012, 2012:607359. doi:10.1155/2012/607359. Epub 2011 Nov 20
  • 2 Domenech Juan I, Cruz Toro P, Callejo Castillo Á, Moya R, Merán Gil JL, Bartel R. Middle fossa approach: Applications in temporal bone lesions. Abordaje por fosa media, aplicaciones en lesiones del hueso temporal. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2016;67(04):233–238. doi:10.1016/j.otorri.2015.06.001
  • 3 Peng KA, Lekovic GP, Wilkinson EP. Pearls for the middle fossa approach in acoustic neuroma surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 26 (05) 276-279
  • 4 Mikulec AA, Poe DS, McKenna MJ. Operative management of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Laryngoscope 2005; 115 (03) 501-507
  • 5 Fisch U. Transtemporal surgery of the internal auditory canal. Transtemporal Surgery of the Internal Auditory Canal. 17: Karger Publishers; 1970: 203-240
  • 6 Fisch U, Mattox D. Microsurgery of the skull base. Thieme; 1988
  • 7 Tsunoda A, Kimura Y, Sumi T, Komatsuzaki A, Sato T. The arcuate eminence is not a protrusion of the superior semi-circular canal but a trace of sulcus on the temporal lobe. J Laryngol Otol 2000; 114 (05) 339-344
  • 8 Seo Y, Ito T, Sasaki T, Nakagawara J, Nakamura H. Assessment of the anatomical relationship between the arcuate eminence and superior semicircular canal by computed tomography. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2007; 47 (08) 335-339 , discussion 339–340
  • 9 El Hadi T, Sorrentino T, Calmels M-N, Fraysse B, Deguine O, Marx M. Spontaneous tegmen defect and semicircular canal dehiscence: same etiopathogenic entity?. Otol Neurotol 2012; 33 (04) 591-595
  • 10 Patel NS, Hunter JB, O'Connell BP, Wanna GB, Carlson ML. O'ConnellBP, WannaGB, CarlsonML. An easy and reliable method to locate the dehiscence during middle fossa superior canal dehiscence surgery: it is a (C) inch. Otol Neurotol 2016; 37 (08) 1092-1095
  • 11 Maina R, Ducati A, Lanzino G. The middle cranial fossa: morphometric study and surgical considerations. Skull Base 2007; 17 (06) 395-403
  • 12 Beckett JS, Chung LK, Lagman C. et al. A Method of locating the dehiscence during middle fossa approach for superior semicircular canal dehiscence surgery. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2017; 78 (04) 353-358
  • 13 Sennaroglu L, Slattery III WH. Petrous anatomy for middle fossa approach. Laryngoscope 2003; 113 (02) 332-342
  • 14 Cokkeser Y, Aristegui M, Naguib MB, Saleh E, Taibah AK, Sanna M. Identification of internal acoustic canal in the middle cranial fossa approach: a safe technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 124 (01) 94-98
  • 15 Garcia-Ibanez E, Garcia-Ibanez JL. Middle fossa vestibular neurectomy: a report of 373 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1980; 88 (04) 486-490
  • 16 House WF, Shelton C. Middle fossa approach for acoustic tumor removal. 1992. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2008; 19 (02) 279-288 , vi vi