Am J Perinatol 2020; 37(08): 792-799
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1712103
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Exclusion of Pregnant Women from Clinical Trials during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Review of International Registries

1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
,
Jessica L. Pippen
1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
,
Adebayo A. Adesomo
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
,
Kara M. Rood
1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
,
Mark B. Landon
1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
,
Maged M. Costantine
1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
› Institutsangaben
Funding M.M.C. is supported by a grant from The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (grant number: 5 UG1 HD027915–29) and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (grant number: 1UG3HL140131–01). This manuscript does not necessarily represent the official views of the NICHD, NHLBI, or the National Institute of Health.
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

20. April 2020

24. April 2020

Publikationsdatum:
19. Mai 2020 (online)

Abstract

Objective Pregnant women have been historically excluded from clinical trials for nonobstetric conditions, even during prior epidemics. The objective of this review is to describe the current state of research for pregnant women during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Study Design We conducted a search of international trial registries for trials relating to the novel coronavirus. The eligibility criteria for each trial were reviewed for inclusion/exclusion of pregnant women. Relevant data were extracted and descriptive statistics were calculated for individual and combined data. The total number of trials from each registry were compared, as well as the proportions of pregnancy-related trials within each.

Results Among 621,370 trials in the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, 927 (0.15%) were COVID-19 related. Of those, the majority (52%) explicitly excluded pregnancy or failed to address pregnancy at all (46%) and only 16 (1.7%) were pregnancy specific. When categorized by region, 688 (74.2%) of COVID-19 trials were in Asia, followed by 128 (13.8%) in Europe, and 66 (7.2%) in North America. Of the COVID-19 trials which included pregnant women, only three were randomized-controlled drug trials.

Conclusion Approximately 1.7% of current COVID-19 research is pregnancy related and the majority of trials either explicitly exclude or fail to address pregnancy. Only three interventional trials worldwide involved pregnant women. The knowledge gap concerning the safety and efficacy of interventions for COVID-19 created by the exclusion of pregnant women may ultimately harm them. While “ethical” concerns about fetal exposure are often cited, it is in fact unethical to habitually exclude pregnant women from research.

Key Points

  • Pregnancy was excluded from past pandemic research.

  • Pregnancy is being excluded from COVID-19 research.

  • Exclusion of pregnant women is potentially harmful.

 
  • References

  • 1 Blehar MC, Spong C, Grady C, Goldkind SF, Sahin L, Clayton JA. Enrolling pregnant women: issues in clinical research. Women's Heal Issues 2013 Doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2012.10.003
  • 2 Shields KE, Lyerly AD. Exclusion of pregnant women from industry-sponsored clinical trials. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122 (05) 1077-1081
  • 3 Illamola SM, Bucci-Rechtweg C, Costantine MM, Tsilou E, Sherwin CM, Zajicek A. Inclusion of pregnant and breastfeeding women in research - efforts and initiatives. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2018; 84 (02) 215-222
  • 4 Mitchell AA, Gilboa SM, Werler MM, Kelley KE, Louik C, Hernández-Díaz S. ; National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Medication use during pregnancy, with particular focus on prescription drugs: 1976-2008. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205 (01) 51.e1-51.e8
  • 5 Ayad M, Costantine MM. Epidemiology of medications use in pregnancy. Semin Perinatol 2015; 39 (07) 508-511
  • 6 McCormack SA, Best BM. Obstetric pharmacokinetic dosing studies are urgently needed. Front Pediatr 2014; 2: 9
  • 7 Task Force on Research Specific to Pregnant Women and Lactating Women (PRGLAC). PRGLAC Report to the HHS Secretary and Congress, September 2018.; 2018. Available at: https://www.nichd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/2018-09/PRGLAC_Report.pdf . Accessed April 28, 2020
  • 8 Ballantyne A. Pregnant women can finally expect better. Hastings Cent Rep 2019; 49 (01) 10-11
  • 9 Worldometer. Coronavirus Update (Live): 472,907 Cases and 21,315 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Outbreak - Worldometer. Worldometer; Available at: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ . Accessed April 28, 2020
  • 10 World Health Organization. Coronavirus (COVID-19) events as they happen. WHO; Available at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/events-as-they-happen . Accessed April 28, 2020
  • 11 WHO. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report-79; 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200408-sitrep-79-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=4796b143_6 . Accessed April 28, 2020
  • 12 Gonzalez D, Boggess KA, Cohen-Wolkowiez M. Lessons learned in pediatric clinical research to evaluate safe and effective use of drugs in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125 (04) 953-958
  • 13 Gomes MF, de la Fuente-Núñez V, Saxena A, Kuesel AC. Protected to death: systematic exclusion of pregnant women from Ebola virus disease trials. Reprod Health 2017; 14 (Suppl. 03) 172
  • 14 Connor EM, Sperling RS, Gelber R. , et al. Reduction of maternal-infant transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 with zidovudine treatment. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 076 Study Group. N Engl J Med 1994; 331 (18) 1173-1180
  • 15 Nayak S. Influenza vaccine requirements in pregnant women. J Obstet Gynecol India 2016 Doi: 10.1007/s13224-016-0867-1
  • 16 Louie JK, Acosta M, Jamieson DJ, Honein MA. ; California Pandemic (H1N1) Working Group. Severe 2009 H1N1 influenza in pregnant and postpartum women in California. N Engl J Med 2010; 362 (01) 27-35
  • 17 Newsome K, Williams J, Way S. , et al; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Maternal and infant outcomes among severely ill pregnant and postpartum women with 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1)--United States, April 2009-August 2010. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011; 60 (35) 1193-1196
  • 18 Saleeby E, Chapman J, Morse J, Bryant A, Nygaard I. H1N1 influenza in pregnancy: cause for concern. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114 (04) 885-891
  • 19 Goldkind SF, Sahin L, Gallauresi B. Enrolling pregnant women in research--lessons from the H1N1 influenza pandemic. N Engl J Med 2010; 362 (24) 2241-2243
  • 20 McKiever M, Frey H, Costantine MM. Challenges in conducting clinical research studies in pregnant women. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2020 Doi: 10.1007/s10928-020-09687-z
  • 21 Spong CY, Bianchi DW. Improving public health requires inclusion of underrepresented populations in research. JAMA 2018; 319 (04) 337-338