Senologie - Zeitschrift für Mammadiagnostik und -therapie 2020; 17(02): e43
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1710731
Abstracts
Senologie

A pilot study evaluating the effects of Magtrace for sentinel biopsy regarding care process optimization, reimbursement, surgical time and patient comfort compared to standard Technetium

S Shams
1  Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum, Berlin, Deutschland
,
K Lippold
2  Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Klinik für Urologie, Berlin, Deutschland
,
R Roehle
3  Charité - Universitätsmedizin zu Berlin, Institut für Biometrie und klinische Epidemiologie, Berlin, Deutschland
,
S Paepke
4  Technische Universität München, Klinik für Gynäkologie, München, Deutschland
,
JU Blohmer
1  Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum, Berlin, Deutschland
,
MM Karsten
1  Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum, Berlin, Deutschland
› Author Affiliations
 

Background Sentinel lymph node removal after Technetium (Tc) localization is a mainstay of breast surgery. Timing of Tc injection, can complicate operating room schedules which can result in increased overall costs of care.

Methods We compared 60 patients who underwent breast surgery including a sentinel node biopsy. Per surgeons choice 30 patients were treated with Tc and 30 patients with Magtrace.

Primary outcomes were time spent on the care pathway and operating time from incision to removal of the sentinel node. Secondary outcomes were patient pain levels and treatment cost.

Results Mean time spent on the preoperative breast care pathway was 5.3 (SD=1.4) minutes in the Magtrace group and 81 (SD=19.9) minutes in the Tc group

(p= < 0.0001).

Median time from skin incision to sentinel extraction was 8.52 (IQR 3; 12) minutes in the Magtrace group and 10.93 (IQR 5.2; 13.5) minutes in the Tc group (p = 0.277).

There were 9 preoperative days in the Magtrace group versus 12 in the Tc group.

Mean Length of stay (LoS) was 4.0 days in both groups and applying the InEK DRG-Benchmark 92 % (Magtrace) vs. 94 % (Tc-Group). DRG-Reimbursement remained unchanged as the method of sentinel lymph node localization did not cause changes in OPS coding. Overall treatment cost in the Magtrace group decreased by 360€ per case. However, additional cost for Magtrace must be included in the future.

Conclusion Despite Magtrace localization being a new method, surgical time was similar and it could allow for time and cost savings once established.



Publication History

Publication Date:
24 June 2020 (online)

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York