CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Joints 2019; 07(03): 091-097
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1710388
Original Article

A Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up Experience with a Specific Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty Design

Christian Carulli
1   Orthopaedic Clinic, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
,
1   Orthopaedic Clinic, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
,
Fabrizio Matassi
1   Orthopaedic Clinic, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
,
Roberto Civinini
1   Orthopaedic Clinic, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
,
Massimo Innocenti
1   Orthopaedic Clinic, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Purrpose Metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been a subject of recent discussion and concern due to the early failures caused by local and systemic adverse reactions related to specific designs. The aim of this study is to analyze the outcomes and survival rates of a single brand of MoM implants implanted in a consecutive series of patients at a single institution.

Methods Between 2007 and 2012, 116 (118 hips) patients were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 6.6 years after primary THA. The diagnosis leading to surgery was osteoarthritis (80 patients) and proximal femoral fracture (36 patients). A single design of THA was implanted. All patients were evaluated before surgery and postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months by clinical scores and radiographic studies. The data analysis was made using Student's t-test.

Results The minimum follow-up was of 4 years, with a mean follow-up of 6.6 years. Two aseptic loosenings of the acetabular component were recorded (one per group), which were not associated with local or systemic complications related to metal ion release. Both were revised by an isolated acetabular cup substitution with metal-on-polyethylene couplings. Nonprogressive radiolucency lines < 2 mm in zone 2 were observed in other six patients around the acetabular component without clinical manifestation (four in the arthritis group and two in the fracture group). Postoperative Harris Hip Score and SF-36 (36-Item Short Form Survey) score improved in both groups.

Conclusion Despite several MoM implants showing early complications and failures, a specific MoM design may be associated with good clinical results at a mid- to long-term follow-up.

Level of Evidence This is a therapeutic case series, Level 4 study.



Publication History

Received: 25 November 2017

Accepted: 04 April 2020

Article published online:
06 May 2020

© 2020. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 
  • References

  • 1 Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 2007; 370 (9597): 1508-1519
  • 2 Ejnisman L, Leonhardt NZ, Fernandes LF, Leonhardt MDC, Vicente JR, Croci AT. Comparison of total hip arthroplasty in osteoarthritis of mechanical and rheumatologic causes. Acta Ortop Bras 2014; 22 (01) 38-42
  • 3 Pierce TP, Elmallah RK, Jauregui JJ, Verna DF, Mont MA. Outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head-a current review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2015; 8 (03) 246-251
  • 4 Carulli C, Felici I, Martini C. et al. Total hip arthroplasty in haemophilic patients with modern cementless implants. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (10) 1757-1760
  • 5 Knight SR, Aujla R, Biswas SP. Total hip arthroplasty - over 100 years of operative history. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2011; 3 (02) e16
  • 6 Sands D, Schemitsch EH. The role of metal-on-metal bearings in total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing: review article. HSS J 2017; 13 (01) 2-6
  • 7 Hjorth MH, Stilling M, Soballe K. et al. No association between pseudotumors, high serum metal-ion levels and metal hypersensitivity in large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty at 5-7-year follow-up. Skeletal Radiol 2016; 45 (01) 115-125
  • 8 Tharani R, Dorey FJ, Schmalzried TP. The risk of cancer following total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83 (05) 774-780
  • 9 Harkess JW, Crockarell JR. Arthroplasty of the hip. In: Canale ST, Beaty JH. eds. Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics. 11th ed. St Louis, MO: CV Mosby; 2007: 318-334
  • 10 Hartmann A, Lützner J, Kirschner S, Witzleb WC, Günther KP. Do survival rate and serum ion concentrations 10 years after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing provide evidence for continued use?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (11) 3118-3126
  • 11 U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Concerns about Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/metal-metal-hip-implants/concerns-about-metal-metal-hip-implants
  • 12 Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A. et al. Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (01) 28-36
  • 13 Ricciardi BF, Nocon AA, Jerabek SA. et al. Histopathological characterization of corrosion product associated adverse local tissue reaction in hip implants: a study of 285 cases. BMC Clin Pathol 2016; 16: 3
  • 14 Granchi D, Cenni E, Giunti A, Baldini N. Metal hypersensitivity testing in patients undergoing joint replacement: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94 (08) 1126-1134
  • 15 Yin S, Zhang D, Du H, Du H, Yin Z, Qiu Y. Is there any difference in survivorship of total hip arthroplasty with different bearing surfaces? A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015; 8 (11) 21871-21885
  • 16 Engh Jr CA, Sritulanondha S, Korczak A. et al. No Difference in reoperations at 2 years between ceramic-on-metal and metal-on-metal THA: a randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016; 474 (02) 447-455
  • 17 Engh Jr CA, Ho H, Engh CA. Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: does early clinical outcome justify the chance of an adverse local tissue reaction?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (02) 406-412
  • 18 Neumann DR, Thaler C, Hitzl W, Huber M, Hofstädter T, Dorn U. Long-term results of a contemporary metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a 10-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25 (05) 700-708
  • 19 Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ. Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23 (06, Suppl 1): 36-43
  • 20 Nilsdotter A, Bremander A. Measures of hip function and symptoms: Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Lequesne Index of Severity for Osteoarthritis of the Hip (LISOH), and American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) Hip and Knee Questionnaire. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011; 63: 200-207
  • 21 Kelly A, Rush J, Shafonsky E. et al. Detecting short-term change and variation in health-related quality of life: within- and between-person factor structure of the SF-36 health survey. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2015; 13: 199
  • 22 DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976; (121) 20-32
  • 23 Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979; (141) 17-27
  • 24 Ackland MK, Bourne WB, Uhthoff HK. Anteversion of the acetabular cup. Measurement of angle after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1986; 68 (03) 409-413
  • 25 Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley Jr LH. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973; 55 (08) 1629-1632
  • 26 Sentürk U, Perka C. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty (THA) [in German]. Z Orthop Unfall 2015; 153 (02) 198-202
  • 27 Pezzotti G, Yamamoto K. Artificial hip joints: the biomaterials challenge. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014; 31: 3-20
  • 28 Silverman EJ, Ashley B, Sheth NP. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: is there still a role in 2016?. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2016; 9 (01) 93-96
  • 29 Rieker C, Konrad R, Schön R. In vitro comparison of the two hard-hard articulations for total hip replacements. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2001; 215 (02) 153-160
  • 30 Hannouche D, Zaoui A, Zadegan F, Sedel L, Nizard R. Thirty years of experience with alumina-on-alumina bearings in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2011; 35 (02) 207-213
  • 31 Thomas MS, Wimhurst JA, Nolan JF, Toms AP. Imaging metal-on-metal hip replacements: the Norwich experience. HSS J 2013; 9 (03) 247-256
  • 32 Walker PS, Salvati E, Hotzler RK. The wear on removed McKee-Farrar total hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974; 56 (01) 92-100
  • 33 Yoon TR, Rowe SM, Jung ST, Seon KJ, Maloney WJ. Osteolysis in association with a total hip arthroplasty with ceramic bearing surfaces. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80 (10) 1459-1468
  • 34 Cousen PJ, Gawkrodger DJ. Metal allergy and second-generation metal-on-metal arthroplasties. Contact Dermat 2012; 66 (02) 55-62
  • 35 August AC, Aldam CH, Pynsent PB. The McKee-Farrar hip arthroplasty. A long-term study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1986; 68 (04) 520-527
  • 36 Dobbs HS. Survivorship of total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1980; 62-B (02) 168-173
  • 37 Cuckler JM, Moore KD, Lombardi Jr AV, McPherson E, Emerson R. Large versus small femoral heads in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19 (08, Suppl 3): 41-44
  • 38 Triclot P. Metal-on-metal: history, state of the art (2010). Int Orthop 2011; 35 (02) 201-206
  • 39 Matthies AK, Skinner JA, Osmani H, Henckel J, Hart AJ. Pseudotumors are common in well-positioned low-wearing metal-on-metal hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (07) 1895-1906
  • 40 Cohen D. How safe are metal-on-metal hip implants?. BMJ 2012; 344: e1410
  • 41 Innocenti M, Carulli C, Matassi F, Carossino AM, Brandi ML, Civinini R. Total knee arthroplasty in patients with hypersensitivity to metals. Int Orthop 2014; 38 (02) 329-333
  • 42 Dramis A, Clatworthy E, Jones SA, John A. High failure rate of the R3 metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 2014; 24 (05) 442-447
  • 43 Dhotare SV, Shivarathre DG, Croitoru C, Armstrong C, Kapoor B, Peter VK. Medium-term results following large diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: increasing failure after 6 years. Hip Int 2016; 26 (03) 226-232
  • 44 Catelas I, Campbell PA, Dorey F, Frausto A, Mills BG, Amstutz HC. Semi-quantitative analysis of cytokines in MM THR tissues and their relationship to metal particles. Biomaterials 2003; 24 (26) 4785-4797
  • 45 Mahendra G, Pandit H, Kliskey K, Murray D, Gill HS, Athanasou N. Necrotic and inflammatory changes in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasties. Acta Orthop 2009; 80 (06) 653-659
  • 46 Hug KT, Watters TS, Vail TP, Bolognesi MP. The withdrawn ASR™ THA and hip resurfacing systems: how have our patients fared over 1 to 6 years?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (02) 430-438
  • 47 Hutt J, Lavigne M, Lungu E, Belzile E, Morin F, Vendittoli PA. Comparison of whole-blood metal ion levels among four types of large-head, metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty implants: a concise follow-up, at five years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016; 98 (04) 257-266
  • 48 Mokka J, Junnila M, Seppänen M. et al. Adverse reaction to metal debris after ReCap-M2A-Magnum large-diameter-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2013; 84 (06) 549-554
  • 49 Koper MC, Mathijssen NM, Vehmeijer SB. A 5-year survival analysis of 160 Biomet Magnum M2 metal-on-metal total hip prostheses. Hip Int 2016; 26 (01) 50-56
  • 50 Lombardi Jr AV, Berend KR, Morris MJ, Adams JB, Sneller MA. Large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: dislocation infrequent but survivorship poor. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (02) 509-520
  • 51 Hart AJ, Sabah SA, Bandi AS. et al. Sensitivity and specificity of blood cobalt and chromium metal ions for predicting failure of metal-on-metal hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93 (10) 1308-1313
  • 52 Brodner W, Bitzan P, Meisinger V, Kaider A, Gottsauner-Wolf F, Kotz R. Serum cobalt levels after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85 (11) 2168-2173
  • 53 Dahlstrand H, Stark A, Anissian L, Hailer NP. Elevated serum concentrations of cobalt, chromium, nickel, and manganese after metal-on-metal alloarthroplasty of the hip: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (06) 837-845
  • 54 Moulin JJ, Wild P, Romazini S. et al. Lung cancer risk in hard-metal workers. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 148 (03) 241-248
  • 55 Corradi M, Daniel J, Ziaee H, Alinovi R, Mutti A, McMinn DJ. Early markers of nephrotoxicity in patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (06) 1651-1659
  • 56 Grübl A, Marker M, Brodner W. et al. Long-term follow-up of metal-on-metal total hip replacement. J Orthop Res 2007; 25 (07) 841-848
  • 57 Daniel J, Ziaee H, Pradhan C, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ. Renal clearance of cobalt in relation to the use of metal-on-metal bearings in hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (04) 840-845
  • 58 Beraudi A, Catalani S, Montesi M. et al. Detection of cobalt in synovial fluid from metal-on-metal hip prosthesis: correlation with the ion haematic level. Biomarkers 2013; 18 (08) 699-705
  • 59 De Pasquale D, Stea S, Squarzoni S. et al. Metal-on-metal hip prostheses: correlation between debris in the synovial fluid and levels of cobalt and chromium ions in the bloodstream. Int Orthop 2014; 38 (03) 469-475
  • 60 Migaud H, Putman S, Combes A. et al. Metal-on-metal bearing: is this the end of the line? We do not think so. HSS J 2012; 8 (03) 262-269
  • 61 Reito A, Parkkinen J, Puolakka T, Pajamäki J, Eskelinen A. Diagnostic utility of joint fluid metal ion measurement for histopathological findings in metal-on-metal hip replacements. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015; 16: 393
  • 62 Hart AJ, Sabah SA, Sampson B. et al. Surveillance of patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and total hip prostheses: a prospective cohort study to investigate the relationship between blood metal ion levels and implant failure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (13) 1091-1099
  • 63 Hjorth MH, Søballe K, Jakobsen SS, Lorenzen ND, Mechlenburg I, Stilling M. No association between serum metal ions and implant fixation in large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2014; 85 (04) 355-362
  • 64 Bayley N, Khan H, Grosso P. et al. What are the predictors and prevalence of pseudotumor and elevated metal ions after large-diameter metal-on-metal THA?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (02) 477-484
  • 65 Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ. Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23 (06, Suppl 1): 36-43
  • 66 Koper MC, Mathijssen NM, Vehmeijer SB. A 5-year survival analysis of 160 Biomet Magnum M2 metal-on-metal total hip prostheses. Hip Int 2016; 26 (01) 50-56
  • 67 Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ. et al. Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93 (08) 1011-1016
  • 68 Wienroth M, McCormack P, Joyce TJ. Precaution, governance and the failure of medical implants: the ASR(TM) hip in the UK. Life Sci Soc Policy 2014; 10: 19
  • 69 National Joint Registry for England and Wales (NJR England-Wales) 6th Annual Report 2009. ISSN 1753-9374
  • 70 Gill HS, Grammatopoulos G, Adshead S, Tsialogiannis E, Tsiridis E. Molecular and immune toxicity of CoCr nanoparticles in MoM hip arthroplasty. Trends Mol Med 2012; 18 (03) 145-155
  • 71 Schey JA. Systems views of optimizing metal on metal bearings. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; (329) 115-127
  • 72 Nicolli A, Bisinella G, Padovani G, Vitella A, Chiara F, Trevisan A. Predictivity and fate of metal ion release from metal-on-metal total hip prostheses. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (09) 1763-1767
  • 73 Campbell P, Beaulé PE, Ebramzadeh E. et al. The John Charnley Award: a study of implant failure in metal-on-metal surface arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 453 (453) 35-46