Recipient Vessel Thrombectomy and Anastomosis within the Zone of Injury in Microvascular Extremity Reconstruction

Abstract

Background In traumatic extremity reconstruction, it is preferable to perform microvascular anastomoses outside the zone of injury. Alternatively, a recipient-vessel thrombectomy can be performed to improve the arterial inflow, potentially avoiding further proximal dissection and the use of a vein graft. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of microvascular anastomosis after thrombectomy in the zone of injury.

Methods A retrospective review of patients who underwent free tissue transfer for traumatic extremity reconstruction by the senior author from 2013 to 2017 was conducted. Patient demographic and clinical data were gathered as well as use of vein grafts, recipient-vessel thrombectomy, postoperative anticoagulation, and flap outcomes.

Results A total of 23 patients underwent 24 free flap procedures for traumatic extremity reconstruction. Ten patients underwent recipient-vessel thrombectomy with 2-Fr Fogarty catheter and were placed on postoperative anticoagulation. In this group overall, there was one case of flap loss due to late wound infection resulting in a 90% success rate. A total of 13 patients underwent 14 free flaps without the use of thrombectomy and vein grafts were performed for 3/14 (21%) patients. In this group, there were four cases of flap loss, resulting in a 71% overall success rate.

Conclusion In traumatic extremity reconstruction, if the artery appears to be visibly appropriate with weak inflow, one may consider attempting thrombectomy to restore pulsatile flow prior to harvesting a vein graft. This study suggests this may be effective and safe with no anastomosis-related flap loss in the thrombectomy group. Further research is required to confirm our results.

Keywords

lower extremity reconstruction - microvascular reconstruction - zone of injury - thrombectomy - vessel preparation

Note

This study was presented at American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery 2018 in Phoenix, AZ.

• References

• 1 Saint-Cyr M, Wong C, Buchel EW, Colohan S, Pederson WC. Free tissue transfers and replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (06) 858e-878e
• 2 Kolker AR, Kasabian AK, Karp NS, Gottlieb JJ. Fate of free flap microanastomosis distal to the zone of injury in lower extremity trauma. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (04) 1068-1073
• 3 Spector JA, Levine S, Levine JP. Free tissue transfer to the lower extremity distal to the zone of injury: indications and outcomes over a 25-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (04) 952-959
• 4 Loos MS, Freeman BG, Lorenzetti A. Zone of injury: a critical review of the literature. Ann Plast Surg 2010; 65 (06) 573-577
• 5 Acland RD. Refinements in lower extremity free flap surgery. Clin Plast Surg 1990; 17 (04) 733-744
• 6 Francel TJ, Vander Kolk CA, Hoopes JE, Manson PN, Yaremchuk MJ. Microvascular soft-tissue transplantation for reconstruction of acute open tibial fractures: timing of coverage and long-term functional results. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89 (03) 478-487 , discussion 488–489
• 7 Hammert WC, Minarchek J, Trzeciak MA. Free-flap reconstruction of traumatic lower extremity wounds. Am J Orthop 2000; 29 (09) 22-26
• 8 Isenberg JS, Sherman R. Zone of injury: a valid concept in microvascular reconstruction of the traumatized lower limb?. Ann Plast Surg 1996; 36 (03) 270-272
• 9 Miyamoto S, Takushima A, Okazaki M, Ohura N, Minabe T, Harii K. Relationship between microvascular arterial anastomotic type and area of free flap survival: comparison of end-to-end, end-to-side, and retrograde arterial anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (06) 1901-1908
• 10 Nelson JA, Fischer JP, Grover R. , et al. Vein grafting your way out of trouble: Examining the utility and efficacy of vein grafts in microsurgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (06) 830-836
• 11 Heller L, Levin LS. Lower extremity microsurgical reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108 (04) 1029-1041 , quiz 1042
• 12 Parrett BM, Matros E, Pribaz JJ, Orgill DP. Lower extremity trauma: trends in the management of soft-tissue reconstruction of open tibia-fibula fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (04) 1315-1322 , discussion 1323–1324
• 13 Ong YS, Levin LS. Lower limb salvage in trauma. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (02) 582-588
• 14 Roehl KR, Mahabir RC. A practical guide to free tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (01) 147e-158e
• 15 Stompro BE, Stevenson TR. Reconstruction of the traumatized leg: use of distally based free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (05) 1021-1025 , discussion 1026–1027
• 16 Bendon CL, Giele HP. Success of free flap anastomoses performed within the zone of trauma in acute lower limb reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69 (07) 888-893
• 17 Stranix JT, Borab ZM, Rifkin WJ. , et al. Proximal versus distal recipient vessels in lower extremity reconstruction: a retrospective series and systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (05) 334-340
• 18 Cho EH, Shammas RL, Carney MJ. , et al. Muscle versus fasciocutaneous free flaps in lower extremity traumatic reconstruction: a multicenter outcomes analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (01) 191-199
• 19 Song CT, Koh K, Tan B-K, Goh T. Free-flap lower extremity reconstruction: a cohort study and meta-analysis of flap anastomotic outcomes between perforator and nonperforator flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (06) 455-464
• 20 Ricci JA, Abdou SA, Stranix JT. , et al. Reconstruction of gustilo type IIIC injuries of the lower extremity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (04) 982-987
• 21 Haddock NT, Weichman KE, Reformat DD, Kligman BE, Levine JP, Saadeh PB. Lower extremity arterial injury patterns and reconstructive outcomes in patients with severe lower extremity trauma: a 26-year review. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210 (01) 66-72