Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · J Reconstr Microsurg Open 2020; 05(01): e27-e31
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1710345
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Negative Pressure Dressings over Free Muscle Flaps with Immediate Split-Thickness Skin Grafting: A 9-Year Experience

Pallavi A. Kumbla
1   UAB Division of Plastic Surgery, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Steven L. Henry
2   Seton Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, Austin, Texas
,
Carter J. Boyd
3   UAB School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Patrick K. Kelley
4   Craniofacial Team of Texas, Austin, Texas
,
Ashley Q. Thorburn
5   David Grant Medical Center, Travis AFB, California
,
René P. Myers
6   Division of Pediatric Plastic Surgery, UAB Division of Plastic Surgery, Birmingham, Alabama
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

01 February 2020

20 March 2020

Publication Date:
21 May 2020 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Negative pressure wound therapy has allowed for significant advances in the treatment of wounds. This occurs through a process of angiogenesis, microdeformation, macrodeformation, and decrease in exudate and bacterial load. It is routinely used as a bolster in the management of skin grafts. However, its role as a dressing over free muscle flaps has not gained widespread acceptance due to the fear of flap compromise.

Methods A retrospective review of 97 patients over 9 years was performed. All patients underwent free muscle flap coverage of various wounds with immediate split-thickness skin grafting. A negative pressure dressing was applied, with windows made in the foam sponge to enable Doppler monitoring as well as visual inspection of the flap. Complications including flap failure, skin graft loss, hematoma, distal flap necrosis, negative pressure dressing failure, partial muscle necrosis, and mild flap congestion were assessed.

Results Flap loss occurred at a rate of 8.2% (eight flaps). Four of these flaps were lost due to patient factors not attributable to the dressing. In the remaining four flaps (4.1% of the series), it is conceivable that the negative pressure dressing was a contributing factor. However, this failure rate is comparable to flap loss rates in studies where negative pressure dressings were not used. The rates of skin graft failure, hematoma, distal flap necrosis, inability to maintain seal, partial muscle necrosis, and mild flap congestion were also acceptable and similar to studies where negative pressure dressings were not used.

Conclusion Negative pressure dressings over free muscle flaps with immediate split-thickness skin grafts are effective and safe to use while allowing for postoperative flap monitoring and skin graft protection.

Keywords

negative pressure dressing - free muscle flap - split-thickness skin graft
 

  • References

  • 1 Lalezari S, Lee CJ, Borovikova AA. , et al. Deconstructing negative pressure wound therapy. Int Wound J 2017; 14 (04) 649-657
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Nakayama Y, Iino T, Soeda S. A new method for the dressing of free skin grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86 (06) 1216-1219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Blackburn II JH, Boemi L, Hall WW. , et al. Negative-pressure dressings as a bolster for skin grafts. Ann Surg 1998; 40 (05) 453-457
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Chim H, Zoghbi Y, Nugent AG, Kassira W, Askari M, Salgado CJ. Immediate application of vacuum assisted closure dressing over free muscle flaps in the lower extremity does not compromise flap survival and results in decreased flap thickness. Arch Plast Surg 2018; 45 (01) 45-50
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bi H, Khan M, Li J, Pestana IA. Use of incisional negative pressure wound therapy in skin-containing free tissue transfer. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (03) 200-205
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Eisenhardt SU, Momeni A, Iblher N. , et al. The use of the vacuum-assisted closure in microsurgical reconstruction revisited: application in the reconstruction of the posttraumatic lower extremity. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (09) 615-622
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Yu P, Yu N, Yang X, Jin X, Lu H, Qi Z. Clinical efficacy and safety of negative-pressure wound therapy on flaps: a systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (05) 358-366
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Gorman PW, Barnes CL, Fischer TJ, McAndrew MP, Moore MM. Soft-tissue reconstruction in severe lower extremity trauma. A review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; 243 (243) 57-64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Melissinos EG, Parks DH. Post-trauma reconstruction with free tissue transfer--analysis of 442 consecutive cases. J Trauma 1989; 29 (08) 1095-1102 , discussion 1102–1103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Rainer C, Schwabegger AH, Bauer T. , et al. Free flap reconstruction of the foot. Ann Plast Surg 1999; 42 (06) 595-606 , discussion 606–607
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Xiong L, Gazyakan E, Kremer T. , et al. Free flaps for reconstruction of soft tissue defects in lower extremity: A meta-analysis on microsurgical outcome and safety. Microsurgery 2016; 36 (06) 511-524
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cho EH, Shammas RL, Carney MJ. , et al. Muscle versus fasciocutaneous free flaps in lower extremity traumatic reconstruction: a multicenter outcomes analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (01) 191-199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kwok AC, Agarwal JP. An analysis of free flap failure using the ACS NSQIP database. Does flap site and flap type matter?. Microsurgery 2017; 37 (06) 531-538
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hanasono MM, Skoracki RJ. Securing skin grafts to microvascular free flaps using the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) device. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 58 (05) 573-576
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar