CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU 2015; 05(01): 071-074
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709753
Case Report

A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH FOR FUNCTIONAL REHABILITATION OF A PATIENT WITH SKELETAL CLASS III MALOCCLUSION AND AMELOGENESIS IMPERFECTA

Archana S Shetty
1   Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, V.S. Dental College & Hospital, Bangalore, Nitte University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
,
Krishna Prasad D.
2   Professor & HOD, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Nitte University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
,
M S Ravi
3   Professor, Department of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Nitte University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
,
B Rajendra Prasad
4   Principal & Dean, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Amelogenesis Imperfecta has been defined as a group of hereditary enamel defects not associated with evidence of systemic disease. Restoration for patients with this condition should be oriented toward the functional and esthetic rehabilitation and the protection of these teeth. The specific objectives of the treatment were to enhance esthetics, eliminate tooth sensitivity and restore masticatory function. Management of a patient with skeletal class III malocclusion and Amleogenesis Imperfecta is a challenge for the clinician. Surgical correction of the skeletal class III malocclusion, orthodontic therapy followed by full mouth rehabilitation as a multidisciplinary approach is vital for the functional rehabilitation of the patient.



Publication History

Article published online:
22 April 2020

© .

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Robinson FG, Haubenreich JE. Oral rehabilitation of a young adult with hypoplastic amelogenesis imperfecta: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2006 Jan;95(1):10-3.
  • 2 Sari T, Usumez A. Restoring function and esthetics in a patient with amelogenesis imperfecta: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2003 Dec; 90(6):522-5.
  • 3 Lindunger A, Smedberg JI. A retrospective study of the prosthodontic management of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta. Int J Prosthodon, 2005 May-June; 18(3):189-94.
  • 4 Bouvier D, Duprez JP, Pirel C, Vincent B. Amelogenesis imperfecta – a prosthetic rehabilitation: A clinical report J Prosthet Dent 1999 Aug; 82(2):130-1.
  • 5 Yip HK, Smales RJ. Oral Rehabilitation of young adults with amelogenesis imperfecta. Int J Prosthodont 2003 July-Aug 16(4):345- 9.
  • 6 Dawson PE. Evaluation, diagnosis and treatment of occlusal problems. 2nd ed. StLouis: Elsevier; 1989. p. 85, 373-81.
  • 7 Small BW. Occlusal plane analysis using the Broadrick flag. Gen Dent 2005;53:250-2.
  • 8 Sumit Bedia, Shankar Dange, Arun N. Determination of the occlusal plane using a custom-made occlusal plane analyzer: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:348-352.