CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2020; 53(01): 064-070
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709531
Original Article

The Revolving Door Flap: Revisiting an Elegant but Forgotten Flap for Ear Defect Reconstruction

Anupam Golash
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, Calcutta Medical Research Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
,
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, Calcutta Medical Research Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
,
Aditya V. Kanoi
2   Department of Reconstructive Surgery, Narayana Superspeciality Hospital, Howrah, West Bengal, India
,
Abhijit Golash
3   Calcutta Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Background The revolving door flap, although well described in the literature, is not widely used in general plastic surgery practice. The flap has been used for anterior auricular and conchal defects and is considered elegant for its unique flap design and peculiarity of flap harvest. However, due to its use for a very specific purpose and unique flap harvest technique that may be difficult to grasp, the flap is not very popular in reconstructive practice.

Objectives This study aims to evaluate the understanding and learning curve of the revolving door flap, assess surgical outcome, and reemphasize its utility and elegance in reconstruction of ear defects.

Methodology This is a case series of nine surgeries performed between January 2014 and 2018. Three cases were performed by the senior author and six cases by two junior authors. Patients were observed for complications and aesthetic outcomes.

Results The mean dimension of the flaps was 27.22 mm × 22.78 mm. The mean operative time was 56.56 minutes (standard deviation 22.50, standard error of the mean 7.5). Flap congestion was noted in three cases postoperatively which resolved completely by the second week. Major “pinning” of the ear was noted in four cases.

Conclusion Though infrequently performed, the revolving door flap has an easy learning curve once the proper harvest technique and flap movement has been grasped. The flap harvest is convenient, safe, and yields predictable results. Not only is total or partial flap loss extremely rare, the flap is sensate, color match is good, auricular contour is maintained, and the donor site can be closed primarily and remains well hidden.



Publication History

Article published online:
13 April 2020

© .

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Dessy LA, Figus A, Fioramonti P, Mazzocchi M, Scuderi N. Reconstruction of anterior auricular conchal defect after malignancy excision: revolving-door flap versus full-thickness skin graft. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (05) 746-752
  • 2 Masson JK. A simple island flap for reconstruction of concha-helix defects. Br J Plast Surg 1972; 25 (04) 399-403
  • 3 Jackson IT, Milligan L, Agrawal K. Versatile revolving door flap in the reconstruction of ear defects. Eur J Plast Surg 1994; 17 (03) 131-133
  • 4 Lynch J, Mahajan AL, Regan P. The trap door flap for reconstructing defects of the concha. Br J Plast Surg 2003; 56 (07) 709-711
  • 5 Nguyen DH, Bordeaux JS. Pull-through subcutaneous pedicle flap for an anterior auricular defect. Dermatol Surg 2010; 36 (06) 945-949
  • 6 Papadopoulos ON, Karypidis DK, Chrisostomidis CI, Konofaos PP, Frangoulis MB. One-stage reconstruction of the antihelix and concha using postauricular island flap. Clin Exp Dermatol 2008; 33 (05) 647-650
  • 7 Talmi YP, Liokumovitch P, Wolf M, Horowitz Z, Kopolovitch J, Kronenberg J. Anatomy of the postauricular island “revolving door” flap (“flip-flop” flap). Ann Plast Surg 1997; 39 (06) 603-607
  • 8 Turan A, Turkaslan T, Kul Z, Isler C, Ozsoy Z. Reconstruction of the anterior surface of the ear using a postauricular pull-through neurovascular island flap. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 56 (06) 609-613
  • 9 Schonauer F, Vuppalapati G, Marlino S, Santorelli A, Canta L, Molea G. Versatility of the posterior auricular flap in partial ear reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (04) 1213-1221
  • 10 Fader DJ, Johnson TM. Ear reconstruction utilizing the subcutaneous island pedicle graft (flip-flop) flap. Dermatol Surg 1999; 25 (02) 94-96
  • 11 Wang SQ, Goldberg LH, Asadi AK. Surgical conundrum: transcartilage island pedicle flap for a scapha defect. Dermatol Surg 2009; 35 (03) 505-508
  • 12 Humphreys TR, Goldberg LH, Wiemer DR. The postauricular (revolving door) island pedicle flap revisited. Dermatol Surg 1996; 22 (02) 148-150
  • 13 Iljin A, Lewandowicz E, Antoszewski B, Durko M, Zieliński T. Results of auricular Conchal bowl reconstructions following cancer resections with postauricular island flap. Pol Przegl Chir 2016; 88 (06) 315-320
  • 14 Nemir S, Hunter-Ellul L, Codrea V, Wagner R. Reconstruction of a large anterior defect after Mohs micrographic surgery with a cartilage graft and postauricular revolving door flap. Case Rep Dermatol Med 2015; 2015: 484819
  • 15 Politi M, Robiony M. Anthelix-conchal reconstruction with postauricular “revolving door” island flap. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 24 (05) 340-341
  • 16 Ruiz M, Garcia O, Hernán I, Sancho J, Serracanta J, Barret JP. Revolving-door flap: an alternative for the coverage of acute burn defects of the auricle. Burns 2011; 37 (06) e41-e43
  • 17 Oh MJ, Kang SJ, Sun H. A simple modified flip-flop flap for the reconstruction of antihelix and triangular fossa defects. Arch Plast Surg 2016; 43 (01) 122-124
  • 18 Talmi YP, Horowitz Z, Bedrin L, Kronenberg J. Technique of auricular reconstruction with a postauricular island flap ‘flip-flop flap’. Oper Tech Otolaryngol—Head Neck Surg 2000; 11 (04) 313-317
  • 19 Talmi YP, Wolf M, Horowitz Z, Bedrin L, Kronenberg J. “Second look” at auricular reconstruction with a postauricular island flap: “flip-flop flap”. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (02) 713-715