Abstract
Introduction Little and ring finger carpometacarpal joints (CMCJs) injuries are commonly missed
due to misinterpretation of radiographs. We aimed to determine the sensitivity and
specificity of four different radiographic views.
Materials and Methods Radiographs (posteroanterior [PA], lateral [LAT], pronated oblique [POL], and supinated
oblique [SOL] views) showing normal findings or little/ring finger CMCJ injuries were
shown to two cohorts of orthopaedic trainees and a cohort of emergency nurse practitioners.
Results The POL view performed best in all three testing scenarios. The SOL view performed
least well. The combination of a PA, true LAT, and POL identified 78% of injuries
correctly. In no cases did the SOL view correctly identify an injury when the other
three views had been interpreted as normal.
Conclusion We recommend a combination of the PA, POL, and LAT views in diagnosing these injuries.
Where doubt remains, cross-sectional imaging is essential.
Keywords
carpometacarpal - dislocation - fracture - hamate - metacarpal