PDF herunterladen
Semin intervent Radiol 2020; 37(02): 199-206
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709206
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Endovascular Stroke Interventions: Procedural Complications and Management

Ahmed Elakkad
1   Division of Interventional Neuroradiology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Gerald Drocton
1   Division of Interventional Neuroradiology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Ferdinand Hui
1   Division of Interventional Neuroradiology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
14. Mai 2020 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy has evolved significantly and has become the mainstay and most effective currently available treatment for acute ischemic stroke patients due to large vessel occlusion. Mechanical thrombectomy is presently performed using a stent retriever or stent-like device, an aspiration catheter, or a combination of the two. Much of the literature has focused on the benefits of endovascular mechanical thrombectomy with only limited data about procedural complications and management. Awareness of risk factors and early recognition of these complications can potentially reduce complication rates, improve management, and yield better overall outcomes. In this review, the authors present a description of intraprocedural complications and strategies to prevent and treat these complications.

Keywords

interventional radiology - stroke - complication - hemorrhage - stent
 

  • References

  • 1 Balami JS, White PM, McMeekin PJ, Ford GA, Buchan AM. Complications of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke: Prevention and management. Int J Stroke 2018; 13 (04) 348-361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Church EW, Gundersen A, Glantz MJ, Simon SD. Number needed to treat for stroke thrombectomy based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2017; 156: 83-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Shah VA, Martin CO, Hawkins AM, Holloway WE, Junna S, Akhtar N. Groin complications in endovascular mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a 10-year single center experience. J Neurointerv Surg 2016; 8 (06) 568-570
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Alawieh A, Vargas J, Fargen KM. , et al. Impact of procedure time on outcomes of thrombectomy for stroke. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 73 (08) 879-890
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Haussen DC, Nogueira RG, DeSousa KG. , et al. Transradial access in acute ischemic stroke intervention. J Neurointerv Surg 2016; 8 (03) 247-250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Mokin M, Snyder KV, Levy EI, Hopkins LN, Siddiqui AH. Direct carotid artery puncture access for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: technical aspects, advantages, and limitations. J Neurointerv Surg 2015; 7 (02) 108-113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Wu CJ, Cheng CI, Hung WC. , et al. Feasibility and safety of transbrachial approach for patients with severe carotid artery stenosis undergoing stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 67 (06) 967-971
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Jadhav AP, Ribo M, Grandhi R. , et al. Transcervical access in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 2014; 6 (09) 652-657
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Akins PT, Amar AP, Pakbaz RS, Fields JD. ; SWIFT Investigators. Complications of endovascular treatment for acute stroke in the SWIFT trial with solitaire and Merci devices. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014; 35 (03) 524-528
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK. , et al; ESCAPE Trial Investigators. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (11) 1019-1030
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Campbell BC, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ. , et al; EXTEND-IA Investigators. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (11) 1009-1018
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E. , et al; REVASCAT Trial Investigators. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (24) 2296-2306
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bracard S, Ducrocq X, Mas JL. , et al; THRACE Investigators. Mechanical thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone after stroke (THRACE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15 (11) 1138-1147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Nikoubashman O, Jungbluth M, Schürmann K. , et al. Neurothrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke: a prospective single-centre study and comparison with randomized controlled trials. Eur J Neurol 2016; 23 (04) 807-816
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Serles W, Gattringer T, Mutzenbach S. , et al; Austrian Stroke Unit Registry Collaborators. Endovascular stroke therapy in Austria: a nationwide 1-year experience. Eur J Neurol 2016; 23 (05) 906-911
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Weber R, Nordmeyer H, Hadisurya J. , et al. Comparison of outcome and interventional complication rate in patients with acute stroke treated with mechanical thrombectomy with and without bridging thrombolysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2017; 9 (03) 229-233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Seto AH, Abu-Fadel MS, Sparling JM. , et al. Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates femoral arterial access and reduces vascular complications: FAUST (Femoral Arterial Access With Ultrasound Trial). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3 (07) 751-758
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Sanborn TA, Ebrahimi R, Manoukian SV. , et al. Impact of femoral vascular closure devices and antithrombotic therapy on access site bleeding in acute coronary syndromes: The Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3 (01) 57-62
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Smilowitz NR, Kirtane AJ, Guiry M. , et al. Practices and complications of vascular closure devices and manual compression in patients undergoing elective transfemoral coronary procedures. Am J Cardiol 2012; 110 (02) 177-182
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Arora N, Matheny ME, Sepke C, Resnic FS. A propensity analysis of the risk of vascular complications after cardiac catheterization procedures with the use of vascular closure devices. Am Heart J 2007; 153 (04) 606-611
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Sheth RA, Walker TG, Saad WE. , et al; Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. Quality improvement guidelines for vascular access and closure device use. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014; 25 (01) 73-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kosmidou I, Karmpaliotis D. . Vascular complications after percutaneous coronary intervention. In: Jeremias A, Brown DL. , eds. Cardiac Intensive Care, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 2010: 270-274
  • 23 Mishra A, Rao A, Pimpalwar Y. Ultrasound guided percutaneous injection of thrombin: effective technique for treatment of iatrogenic femoral pseudoaneurysms. J Clin Diagn Res 2017; 11 (04) TC04-TC06
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Thavarajan D, Bakran A. Iatrogenic arteriovenous fistula in the groin presenting as cardiac failure. NDT Plus 2009; 2 (01) 46-48
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Davis MC, Deveikis JP, Harrigan MR. Clinical presentation, imaging, and management of complications due to neurointerventional procedures. Semin Intervent Radiol 2015; 32 (02) 98-107
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D. , et al; MR CLEAN Investigators. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (01) 11-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Goeggel Simonetti B, Hulliger J, Mathier E. , et al. Iatrogenic vessel dissection in endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Clin Neuroradiol 2019; 29 (01) 143-151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Akpinar SH, Yilmaz G. Periprocedural complications in endovascular stroke treatment. Br J Radiol 2016; 89 (1057): 20150267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Papanagiotou P, White CJ. Endovascular reperfusion strategies for acute stroke. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 9 (04) 307-317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Ishihara H, Ishihara S, Niimi J. , et al. Risk factors and prevention of guiding catheter-induced vasospasm in neuroendovascular treatment. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2015; 55 (03) 261-265
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Behme D, Gondecki L, Fiethen S, Kowoll A, Mpotsaris A, Weber W. Complications of mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke-a retrospective single-center study of 176 consecutive cases. Neuroradiology 2014; 56 (06) 467-476
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A. , et al; SWIFT PRIME Investigators. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (24) 2285-2295
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Bauer AM, Rasmussen PA. Treatment of intracranial vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage. Front Neurol 2014; 5: 72-72
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Masoud H, Nguyen TN, Martin CO. , et al. Inadvertent stent retriever detachment: a multicenter case series and review of device experience FDA reports. Intervent Neurol 2016; 4 (3-4): 75-82
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Youn SW, Kim HK. Refinement of a thrombectomy technique to treat acute ischemic stroke: technical note on microcatheter advance during retrieving self-expandable stent. J Korean Soc Radiol 2012; 67 (01) 1-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Liu KC, Ding D, Starke RM, Geraghty SR, Jensen ME. Intraprocedural retrieval of migrated coils during endovascular aneurysm treatment with the Trevo Stentriever device. J Clin Neurosci 2014; 21 (03) 503-506
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Kabbani MR, Smith A, Leider M. Endovascular coil retrieval using a TrevoProVue stentriever. BMJ Case Rep 2014; 2014: 201
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Yub Lee S, Won Youn S, Kyun Kim H, Rok Do Y. Inadvertent detachment of a retrievable intracranial stent: review of manufacturer and user facility device experience. Neuroradiol J 2015; 28 (02) 172-176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Moshayedi P, Jadhav AP. Direct aspiration catheter fracture and retrieval during neurothrombectomy. Intervent Neurol 2018; 7 (3-4): 148-152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Mokin M, Fargen KM, Primiani CT. , et al. Vessel perforation during stent retriever thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: technical details and clinical outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg 2017; 9 (10) 922-928
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Leishangthem L, Satti SR. Vessel perforation during withdrawal of Trevo ProVue stent retriever during mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. J Neurosurg 2014; 121 (04) 995-998
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Maus V, Brehm A, Tsogkas I, Henkel S, Psychogios MN. Stent retriever placement in embolectomy: the choice of the post-bifurcational trunk influences the first-pass reperfusion result in M1 occlusions. J Neurointerv Surg 2019; 11 (03) 237-240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Doerfler A, Wanke I, Egelhof T. , et al. Aneurysmal rupture during embolization with Guglielmi detachable coils: causes, management, and outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22 (10) 1825-1832
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Nimmo G, Howie A, Grant I. Effects of mechanical ventilation on Cushing's triad. Crit Care 2009; 13 (Suppl. 01) P77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Layton KF, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Cerebral aneurysm perforations during treatment with detachable coils. Use of remodelling balloon inflation to achieve hemostasis. Interv Neuroradiol 2006; 12 (01) 31-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Farhat HI, Elhammady MS, Aziz-Sultan MA. N-Butyl-2-cyanoacrylate use in intraoperative ruptured aneurysms as a salvage rescue: case report. Neurosurgery 2010; 67 (01) 216-217 , discussion 217
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Nguyen TN, Lanthier S, Roy D. Iatrogenic arterial perforation during acute stroke interventions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29 (05) 974-975
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Chueh JY, Puri AS, Wakhloo AK, Gounis MJ. Risk of distal embolization with stent retriever thrombectomy and ADAPT. J Neurointerv Surg 2016; 8 (02) 197-202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Lapergue B, Blanc R, Gory B. , et al; ASTER Trial Investigators. Effect of endovascular contact aspiration vs stent retriever on revascularization in patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion: the ASTER randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017; 318 (05) 443-452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Stampfl S, Pfaff J, Herweh C. , et al. Combined proximal balloon occlusion and distal aspiration: a new approach to prevent distal embolization during neurothrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg 2017; 9 (04) 346-351
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Darkhabani Z, Nguyen T, Lazzaro MA. , et al. Complications of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke and proposed management approach. Neurology 2012; 79 (13) (Suppl. 01) S192-S198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Yilmaz R, Yuksekbas O, Erkol Z, Bulut ER, Arslan MN. Postmortem findings after anaphylactic reactions to drugs in Turkey. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2009; 30 (04) 346-349
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Brown SG. Cardiovascular aspects of anaphylaxis: implications for treatment and diagnosis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2005; 5 (04) 359-364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Grunau BE, Wiens MO, Rowe BH. , et al. Emergency department corticosteroid use for allergy or anaphylaxis is not associated with decreased relapses. Ann Emerg Med 2015; 66 (04) 381-389
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Fiehler J, Cognard C, Gallitelli M. , et al. European Recommendations on Organisation of Interventional Care in Acute Stroke (EROICAS). Int J Stroke 2016; 11 (06) 701-716
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 White PM, Bhalla A, Dinsmore J. , et al. Standards for providing safe acute ischaemic stroke thrombectomy services (September 2015). Clin Radiol 2017; 72 (02) 175.e1-175.e9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Soize S, Barbe C, Kadziolka K, Estrade L, Serre I, Pierot L. Predictive factors of outcome and hemorrhage after acute ischemic stroke treated by mechanical thrombectomy with a stent-retriever. Neuroradiology 2013; 55 (08) 977-987
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Jiang S, Fei A, Peng Y. , et al. Predictors of outcome and hemorrhage in patients undergoing endovascular therapy with solitaire stent for acute ischemic stroke. PLoS One 2015; 10 (12) e0144452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Baek JH, Kim BM, Heo JH. , et al. Number of stent retriever passes associated with futile recanalization in acute stroke. Stroke 2018; 49 (09) 2088-2095
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Kharouba R, Gavriliuc P, Yaghmour NE, Gomori JM, Cohen JE, Leker RR. Number of stentriever passes and outcome after thrombectomy in stroke. J Neuroradiol 2019; 46 (05) 327-330
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Bourcier R, Saleme S, Labreuche J. , et al; ASTER Trial Investigators. More than three passes of stent retriever is an independent predictor of parenchymal hematoma in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 2019; 11 (07) 625-629
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar