The Journal of Hip Surgery 2020; 04(01): 038-044
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709183
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Risk Factors for Early Periprosthetic Fracture after Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Wesley M. Durand
1   Brown University, Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island
,
Morteza Meftah
2   Division of Adult Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York
,
Ran Schwarzkopf
2   Division of Adult Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York
› Author Affiliations
Funding No funding was received in support of this investigation.
Further Information

Publication History

31 August 2019

18 February 2020

Publication Date:
06 April 2020 (online)

Abstract

Periprosthetic fracture (PPF) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with adverse outcomes. Many studies have sought to determine risk factors for PPF, though controversy exists regarding several variables. This study sought to determine risk factors for early PPF using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) dataset. Patients with a primary current procedural terminology for THA were identified. The primary outcome was reoperation/readmission for PPF within 30 days. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to adjust for confounding factors. A total of 159,234 patients were included in the study, of whom 195 patients (0.12%) had a PPF within 30 days, with a mean day of reoperation/readmission of 14.6 (standard deviation 7.7). A total of 68 patients (34.9% of those fractured) underwent one or more reoperations. In multivariable analysis, risk factors for PPF were higher body mass index (BMI; odds ratio [OR] 1.03 per mg/kg2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0–1.05) and higher preoperative leukocyte count (OR 1.04 per 103/mL, 95% CI 1.01–1.06). Among females, age (OR 1.05 per year, 95% CI 1.04–1.07) was significantly associated with PPF, but a similar difference was not observed among males (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.98–1.04). Controlling for patient age, there was no significant difference in risk of PPF for females versus males (p = 0.2213). PPF was associated with the development of additional complications (OR 4.10, 95% CI 2.68–6.27). This study identified risk factors for PPF after primary THA. These results have implications for preoperative planning and postoperative precautions among patients with particularly elevated risk of PPF.

Supplementary Material

 
  • References

  • 1 Young SW, Walker CG, Pitto RP. Functional outcome of femoral peri prosthetic fracture and revision hip arthroplasty: a matched-pair study from the New Zealand Registry. Acta Orthop 2008; 79 (04) 483-488
  • 2 Meek RM, Norwood T, Smith R, Brenkel IJ, Howie CR. The risk of peri-prosthetic fracture after primary and revision total hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93 (01) 96-101
  • 3 Katz JN, Wright EA, Polaris JJ, Harris MB, Losina E. Prevalence and risk factors for periprosthetic fracture in older recipients of total hip replacement: a cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15: 168
  • 4 Pivec R, Issa K, Kapadia BH. , et al. Incidence and future projections of periprosthetic femoral fracture following primary total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of International Registry Data. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2015; 25 (04) 269-275
  • 5 Berend KR, Mirza AJ, Morris MJ, Lombardi Jr AV. Risk of periprosthetic fractures with direct anterior primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (10) 2295-2298
  • 6 Schwarzkopf R, Oni JK, Marwin SE. Total hip arthroplasty periprosthetic femoral fractures: a review of classification and current treatment. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013) 2013; 71 (01) 68-78
  • 7 Liu B, Ma W, Li H, Wu T, Huo J, Han Y. Incidence, classification, and risk factors for intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with a single stem: a retrospective study. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (07) 1400-1411
  • 8 Abdel MP, Cottino U, Mabry TM. Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: a review. Int Orthop 2015; 39 (10) 2005-2010
  • 9 Abdel MP, Watts CD, Houdek MT, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ. Epidemiology of periprosthetic fracture of the femur in 32 644 primary total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B (04) 461-467
  • 10 Singh JA, Jensen MR, Harmsen SW, Lewallen DG. Are gender, comorbidity, and obesity risk factors for postoperative periprosthetic fractures after primary total hip arthroplasty?. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (01) 126-131.e1 , 2
  • 11 Berry DJ. Epidemiology: hip and knee. Orthop Clin North Am 1999; 30 (02) 183-190
  • 12 Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (01) 128-133
  • 13 Zhu Y, Chen W, Sun T, Zhang X, Liu S, Zhang Y. Risk factors for the periprosthetic fracture after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Surg 2015; 104 (03) 139-145
  • 14 Gromov K, Bersang A, Nielsen CS, Kallemose T, Husted H, Troelsen A. Risk factors for post-operative periprosthetic fractures following primary total hip arthroplasty with a proximally coated double-tapered cementless femoral component. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B (04) 451-457
  • 15 Ricioli Jr W, Queiroz MC, Guimarães RP, Honda EK, Polesello G, Fucs PM. Prevalence and risk factors for intra-operative periprosthetic fractures in one thousand eight hundred and seventy two patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study. Int Orthop 2015; 39 (10) 1939-1943
  • 16 Sappey-Marinier E, Viste A, Blangero Y, Desmarchelier R, Fessy MH. A comparative study about the incidence of dislocation and peri-prosthetic fracture between dual mobility versus standard cups after primary total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2019; 43 (12) 2691-2695
  • 17 Thien TM, Chatziagorou G, Garellick G. , et al. Periprosthetic femoral fracture within two years after total hip replacement: analysis of 437,629 operations in the nordic arthroplasty register association database. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (19) e167
  • 18 Park KJ, Menendez ME, Barnes CL. Perioperative periprosthetic fractures associated with primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (03) 992-995
  • 19 Sing DC, Barry JJ, Aguilar TU. , et al. Prior lumbar spinal arthrodesis increases risk of prosthetic-related complication in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (Suppl. 09) 227-232.e1
  • 20 Sarvilinna R, Huhtala HS, Puolakka TJ, Nevalainen JK, Pajamäki KJJ. Periprosthetic fractures in total hip arthroplasty: an epidemiologic study. Int Orthop 2003; 27 (06) 359-361
  • 21 Jakubowitz E, Seeger JB, Lee C, Heisel C, Kretzer JP, Thomsen MN. Do short-stemmed-prostheses induce periprosthetic fractures earlier than standard hip stems? A biomechanical ex-vivo study of two different stem designs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009; 129 (06) 849-855
  • 22 Schuit SC, van der Klift M, Weel AE. , et al. Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam study. Bone 2004; 34 (01) 195-202
  • 23 Lane NE, Pressman AR, Star VL, Cummings SR, Nevitt MC. ; The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Rheumatoid arthritis and bone mineral density in elderly women. J Bone Miner Res 1995; 10 (02) 257-263