CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU 2016; 06(04): 39-45
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1708674
Original Article

Evaluation of the Influence of Various Sprue Designs on Surface Porosity and Dimensional Accuracy of Base Metal Alloy Castings - An In Vitro Study

Nirupama R.
1   Sr Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Deralakatte, Mangalore
,
Manoj Shetty
2   Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Deralakatte, Mangalore
,
Krishna Prasad D.
3   Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Deralakatte, Mangalore
,
Rakshith Hegde
4   Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Deralakatte, Mangalore
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Marginal fit of cast restoration is a major factor in long term survival of restoration. The sprue design is one of the variables that affect successful castings. Porosity can occur both on the surface and sub-surface of the casting. Base metal alloys have been used as an alternative to traditional high gold content alloys due to their superior mechanical properties.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the influence of various sprue designs on surface porosity and dimensional accuracy with conventional sprue design on five-unit singlepiece base metal alloy castings.

Materials and Method: A metal die that stimulate a five unit Fixed partial denture was fabricated. Three different types of sprue designs was assigned to the pattern and casted. The marginal discrepancy was determined by measuring the space between the margin of the crown and the shoulder finish line of the abutment using Scanning electronic Microscope(100X magnification). Surface porosity was evaluated using stereomicroscope (X10 Magnification).

Results: Best marginal fit based on the grand means and standard deviations was in the conventional design group followed by experimental 4mm and 3mmsprue design. Significant differences was present in the 3mm sprue when compared with 4mm sprue(<0.001) as well as the conventional design(<0.001).

Interpretation and Conclusion: There was no surface porosity observed under stereomicroscope. When marginal discrepancy was compared with conventional design, 4mm single sprue was more effective than the 3mm single sprue.



Publication History

Received: 05 April 2016

Accepted: 02 November 2016

Article published online:
22 April 2020

© .

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Thomas A. Wight, Richard J. Grisius, and Robert W. Gaugler, Ph.D. Evaluation of three variables affecting the casting of base metal alloys.JProstho Dent April 1980;43:415-418
  • 2 Daniel Chan, Villa Guillory, Ronald Blackman, and Kwok-hung chung, The effects of sprue design on the roughness and porosity of titanium castings. J Prostho Dent October 1997;78:400-404
  • 3 M.R. Rieger, R.A. Tanquist, and S. Vainer, The effect of new sprue design on the castability of a base metal alloy. J.Prostho Dent June 1986;55:686-690
  • 4 Bruno E. Schiffleger, Gerald J. Ziebert, Virendra B.Dhuru, William A.brntleyKhosrowSingaroudi, Comparison ofaccuracy of multiunitone-piece castings. J Prostho Dent December 1985;54:770-776
  • 5 Takao Fusayama, Sadao Wakumoto, Hiroyasu Hosoda, D.D.S., D.M.Sc.. Accuracy of fixed partial dentures made by various soldering techniques and one-piece casting. J.Prostho Dent March-April 1964;14:334-342
  • 6 Joseph P. Moffa, Armand A. Lugassy, Ph.D., Albert D. Guckes, D.D.S., Lawrence Gettleman, D.M.D., M.S.D. An evaluation of nonprecious alloys for use with porcelain veneers. Part I. Physical properties .J.Prostho Dent October 1973;30:424-431
  • 7 Craig, R. 1985. Restorative Dental Materials, Ed. 7., The C.V. Mosby Co.
  • 8 Clive B. G. Jenkins, and Ralph W. Phillips, An evaluation of five inlay investing techniques employed with different types of wax patterns. J.Prostho Dent February 1971;25:211-220.