CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU 2016; 06(04): 32-38
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1708673
Original Article

Dynamic Smile Visualization and Quantification in different age groups

Harshitha V.
1   Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Deralakatte, Mangalore - 575018, India
,
M.S. Ravi
2   Professor, Dept. of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Deralakatte, Mangalore - 575018, India
,
Reshma Raveendran
3   Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Deralakatte, Mangalore - 575 018, India
,
Raed Saeed
4   Post Graduate, Dept. of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Deralakatte, Mangalore - 575018, India
,
Kiran Kumar C.
5   Former Lecturer, Dept. of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Deralakatte, Mangalore - 575018, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Aims and Objectives: To assess the posed and dynamic smile and to compare the various attributes of smile in frontal, oblique and sagittal dimensions, in two different age groups (10- 15years and 18-25 years).

Materials and Methods: The posed and dynamic smile parameters were measured using digital video clips in 80 subjects of two different age groups (10-15years and 18-25 years). Total of 15 parameters were studied in 3 planes of space. The data was analysed using student`s t-test to compare smile parameters across the age groups, paired t-test was used to analyse the parameters of posed and unposed smile within the same age group and chi-square test was performed for the discrete data.

Results: The present study revealed significant differences in dynamic smile parameters between the two age groups. The parameters like Philtrum height and Smile index are more in older age group whereas the buccal corridor was more in younger age group. Significant differences were also recorded in various parameters in both the groups when the posted smile is compared with that of the dynamic smile.

Conclusion: In both the age groups, the dynamic and posed smile attributes are significantly different, except for buccal corridor and interlabial gap.



Publication History

Received: 06 June 2016

Accepted: 15 October 2016

Article published online:
22 April 2020

© .

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Sarver DM, Ackerman MB. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: Part 1.Evolution of the concept and dynamic records for smile capture. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124:4-12.
  • 2 Sarvera, David M., James L. Ackermanb. Orthodontics about face: the re-emergence of the aesthetic paradigm. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:575-6.
  • 3 C Maulik, R Nanda. Dynamicsmileanalysis in young adults. AmJ Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:3:307-15
  • 4 Ackerman MB, Ackerman JL. Smile analysis and design in the digital era. J. Clin. Orthod 2002;36:221-36.
  • 5 Tjan AHL, Miller GD. Some aesthetic factors in smile. J. Prosthet .Dent 1984;51(1): 24 - 8.
  • 6 Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. The gingival smile line. Angle Orthod 1992;62: 91-100.
  • 7 Sarver DM, Ackerman M. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: Part 2. Smile analysis and treatment strategies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124:116-27.
  • 8 Ackerman MB, Colleen Brensinger, Richard Landis. An Evaluation of Dynamic Lip-Tooth Characteristics During Speech and Smile in Adolescents. The Angle Orthodontist 2003; 74(1): 43–50.
  • 9 Gillen RJ, Schwartz RS, Hilton TJ, Evans DB. An analysis of selected normative tooth proportions. Int J Prosthodont 1994; 7:410-17.
  • 10 Sarver D. The importance of incisor positioning in the aesthetic smile: the smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 120:98-111.