Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2020; 53(01): 036-041
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1708114
Original Article

Pronator Quadratus to Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis Nerve Transfer in C5–C7 or C5–C8 Brachial Plexus Injuries for Independent Wrist Extension

Anil Bhatia
1   Department of Brachial Plexus Surgery, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital, Pune, India
,
Mahmoud Salama
2   Department of Orthopedics, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Patients with lesions affecting C7 and C8 roots (in addition to C56) demonstrate loss of independent wrist dorsiflexion in addition to loss of shoulder abduction and elbow flexion. Traditionally, this deficit has been addressed using tendon transfers after useful function at the shoulder and elbow has been restored by primary nerve surgery. Confidence with nerve transfer techniques has prompted attempts to replace this method by incorporating procedures for wrist dorsiflexion in the primary operation itself.

Aim The objective of this study was to report the results of pronator quadratus motor branch transfers to the extensor carpi radialis brevis motor branch to reconstruct wrist extension in C5–C8 root lesions of the brachial plexus.

Patients and Methods Twenty-three patients, average age 30 years, with C5–8 root injuries underwent operations an average of 4.7 months after their accident. Extrinsic extension of the fingers and thumb was weak or absent in two cases while the remaining 18 patients could open their hand actively. The patients lacked independent wrist extension when they were examined with the fingers flexed as the compensatory action of the extrinsic finger extensors was removed. The average follow-up was 21 months postoperative with the minimal follow-up period was at least 12 months.

Results Successful reinnervations of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) were demonstrated in all patients. In 17 patients, wrist extension scored M4, and in 3 patients it scored M3.

Conclusions The pronator quadratus (PQ) to ECRB nerve transfer in C5–C7 or C5–C8 brachial plexus injuries for independent wrist extension reconstruction gives consistently good results with minimal donor morbidity.

Keywords

pronator quadratus - nerve transfer - brachial plexus injuries - wrist extension reconstruction


Publication History

Article published online:
22 April 2020

© .

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Abid A. Brachial plexus birth palsy: management during the first year of life. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2016; 102 (01) (Suppl) S125-S132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Li G, Shao L. An innovative robotic training system imitating the cervical spine behaviors during rotation-traction manipulation. Robot Auton Syst 2018; 107 (01) 116-128
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ramachandran S, Midha R. Recent advances in nerve repair. Neurol India 2019; 67 (Suppl. 07) S106-S114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bincaz LE, Cherifi H, Alnot JY. Palliative tendon transfer for reanimation of the wrist and finger extension lag. Report of 14 transfers for radial nerve palsies and ten transfers for brachial plexus lesions [in French]. Chir Main 2002; 21 (01) 13-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bertelli JA, Tacca CP, Winkelmann Duarte EC, Ghizoni MF, Duarte H. Transfer of the pronator quadratus motor branch for wrist extension reconstruction in brachial plexus palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (06) 1269-1278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Vanhoutte EK, Faber CG, van Nes SI. et al PeriNomS Study Group. Modifying the Medical Research Council grading system through Rasch analyses. Brain 2012; 135 (Pt 5) 1639-1649
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kim DH, Murovic JA, Tiel RL, Kline DG. Mechanisms of injury in operative brachial plexus lesions. Neurosurg Focus 2004; 16 (05) E2
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Faglioni W Jr, Siqueira MG, Martins RS, Heise CO, Foroni L. The epidemiology of adult traumatic brachial plexus lesions in a large metropolis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014; 156 (05) 1025-1028
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Li ZM. The influence of wrist position on individual finger forces during forceful grip. J Hand Surg Am 2002; 27 (05) 886-896
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Birch R. Timing of surgical reconstruction for closed traumatic injury to the supraclavicular brachial plexus. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2015; 40 (06) 562-567
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kato N, Htut M, Taggart M, Carlstedt T, Birch R. The effects of operative delay on the relief of neuropathic pain after injury to the brachial plexus: a review of 148 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88 (06) 756-759
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Doi K, Otsuka K, Okamoto Y, Fujii H, Hattori Y, Baliarsing AS. Cervical nerve root avulsion in brachial plexus injuries: magnetic resonance imaging classification and comparison with myelography and computerized tomography myelography. J Neurosurg 2002; 96 (03) , Suppl) 277-284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Tung TH, Mackinnon SE. Flexor digitorum superficialis nerve transfer to restore pronation: two case reports and anatomic study. J Hand Surg Am 2001; 26 (06) 1065-1072
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bertelli JA, Ghizoni MF. Transfer of a flexor digitorum superficialis motor branch for wrist extension reconstruction in C5-C8 root injuries of the brachial plexus: a case series. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (01) 39-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ukrit A, Leechavengvongs S, Malungpaishrope K, Uerpairojkit C, Chongthammakun S, Witoonchart K. Nerve transfer for wrist extension using nerve to flexor digitorum superficialis in cervical 5, 6, and 7 root avulsions: anatomic study and report of two cases. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34 (09) 1659-1666
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar