CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU 2015; 05(04): 045-050
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1703934
Original Article

Bacterial Contamination Associated with Retail Chicken Carcasses in Osogbo, Nigeria

Adesiji Yemisi Olukemi
1   Senior Lecturer, Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, College of Health Sciences, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Osogbo, Nigeria
,
Igbinigie Mavis Osas
2   Research assistant, Department of Biomedical Science, College of Health Sciences, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Osogbo, Nigeria
,
Olaitan Janet Olubukola
3   Associate Professor, Department of Biological Science, College of Science, Engineering & Technology, Osun State University, Osogbo, Nigeria
,
Ogah Ikhevha Jeremiah
4   Research Fellow, Infectious Diseases & Environmental Health Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Ilorin, Nigeria
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Worldwide, food borne illness is often associated with consumption of meat and poultry products sold at retail markets. A study on the bacteriological status of chicken carcass in Osogbo, Nigeria, was carried out to determine the prevalence of Arcobacter species, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus in chicken carcasses.

Methodology: A total of 100 samples of chicken carcasses were collected from two major processing points in Osogbo, Nigeria. The samples were analysed for the presence of bacterial contaminants using standard microbiological isolation and identification procedures, with antimicrobial susceptibility test performed using the disk diffusion method.

Result: Of hundred chicken carcasses sampled, 38% were positive for Arcobacter species and E. coli while 60% accounted for S. aureus isolates. Ninety percent of Arcobacter spp isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin, 85% to gentamicin, and pefloxacin, 70% to chloramphenicol and 90% were resistant to amoxicillin, 85% to augumentin and 80% to streptomycin. Hundred percent of E. coli isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin, pefloxacin, 95% to gentamicin and 100% were resistant to streptomycin, 85 % resistant to amoxicillin, augumentin, while 100% of S. aureus isolates were susceptible to trimethoprim sulphamethoxazole, 90% susceptible to gentamicin, 80% to streptomycin and 100% of the S.aureus isolates were resistant to ampliclox.

Conclusion: The bacteriological status of chicken carcass revealed high contamination with Arcobacter, E coli and S. aureus with varying degree of antibiotic resistance therefore, improvement in meat processing procedures and strict hygiene measures towards reduction of these pathogens in food products should be encouraged.



Publication History

Article published online:
22 April 2020

© .

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Afshin J, Saeid S, Reza G. Study on Salmonella contamination in poultry lean meat and meat with skin in Tabriz slaughter houses. Afri J Biotechnol.2014;13(1):181-184.
  • 2 Mensah P, Mwamakamba L, Kariuki S, Fonkoua MC, Aidara-Kane A. Strengthening Foodborne Diseases Surveillance In The WHO African Region: An Essential Need For Disease Control And Food Safety Assurance. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development. 2012;12( 4):31-53
  • 3 Centers For Disease Control And Prevention- CDC. Preliminary Food Net Data On The Incidence Of Infection With Pathogens Transmitted Commonly Through Food—10 States, United States. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;55:392-395.
  • 4 Mulder RW. Hygiene During Transport, Slaughter And Processing. In: Poultry Meat Science. Poultry Science Symposium Series (Richardson And Mead Eds) Cabi Publishing. 1999;25:277-285.
  • 5 Dufour P, Jarraud S, Vandenesch F, Greenland T, Novick RP, Bes M, Etienne J, Lina G.High Genetic Variability of The Agr Locus In Staphylococcus Species. J Bacterio.l2002;184:180-1186.
  • 6 Vandenberg O, Houf K, Douat N, Vlaes L, Retore P, Butzler JP, Dediste A. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Clinical Isolates of Non-Jejuni/Coli Campylobacters And Arcobacters. Belgium Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2006;57:908-913.
  • 7 Iman AS. Isolation and Identification of Arcobacter Species Recovered from Rabbits in Zagazig, Egypt. International Journal of Microbiological Research 2012;3(2):87-92.
  • 8 Van Driessche E, Houf K, Van Hoof J, De Zutter L, Vandamme P. Isolation of Arcobacter species from animal feces. FEMS MicrobiolLett 2003;229:243-248.
  • 9 ICMSF, International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods, Microorganisms in food. 7. Microbiological testing in food safety. management Kluwer Academic-Plenum Publishers. New York. 2002.
  • 10 Houf K, De Zutter L, Verbeke B, Van Hoof J, Vandamme P. Occurrence and distribution of Arcobacter species in poultry processing J Food Prot2002;65(8):1233-9–369.
  • 11 Allos BM, Moore MR, Griffin PM, Tauxe RV. Surveillance for Sporadic Food borne Disease In The 21st Century: The Food Net Perspective. J. Clin. Infect. Dis 2000;38:115–120.
  • 12 Adeyemo OK. Unhygienic Operation Of A City Abbatoir In South Western Nigeria: Environmental Implication. African Journal Of Environmental Asessment And Management. 2002; 4:23-28
  • 13 Waldroup AL. Contamination of Raw Poultry With Pathogens. World's Poult. Sci.J. 1996; 52:7–25.
  • 14 Vandamme, P., M. Vancanneyt, B. Pot, L. Mels, B. Hoste and D. Dewettinck, 1992: Polyphasic taxonomic study of the emended genus Arcobacter with Arcobacter butzleri comb. nov. and Arcobacter skirrowii sp. nov., an aerotolerant bacterium isolated from veterinary specimens. Int J Syst Bacteriol, 42:344–356.
  • 15 Elisenteinn, B.I., D.F. Zaleznik, G.L Mandel, J.L. Benneth and R. Dolin, th 2000: Principles and practice of infectious disease, 5th ed Churchill Livingstone, philadelphia, pa p 2294-2310
  • 16 Bauer AW, Kirby WMM Sherris JC and Turch M (1966). Antibiotic testing by standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Path. 45: 493-496
  • 17 Mead GC: Shelf-Life and Spoilage of Poultry Meat, In: Mead, G.C. Edition. Poultry Meat Processing and Quality Cambridge U.K Woodhead. 2004; Pp. 283-303.
  • 18 Geornaras I, De Jesus A, Van Zyl E, Von Holy A. Microbiological Survey of A South African Poultry Processing Plant. J. Basic Microbiol1996;36:41-49.
  • 19 Lehner A, Tarsara T, Stephen R. Relevant Aspects of Arcobacter Spp. As Potential Foodborne Pathogen. Int. J. Food Microbial 2005;102:127- 135.
  • 20 Jitrapakdee S, Tassanakajon A, Boonsaeng V, Piankijagum S, Panyim, S. A Simple, Rapid And Sensitive Detection Of Salmonella In Food By Polymerase Chain Reaction. Mol Cell Probes 1995;9 :375–382
  • 21 Kabeya H, Maruyama S, Morita Y, Ohsuga T, Ozawa S, Kobayashi Y, et al. Prevalence Of Arcobacter Species In Retail Meats And Antimicrobial Susceptibility Of The Isolates In Japan. Int. J. Food Microbiol 2004;90: 303-308.
  • 22 Villarruel-Lopez A, Marquez-Gonzalez M, Garay-Martinez LE, Zepeda H, Castillo A, Mota L, et al. Isolation Of Arcobacter Spp. From Retail Meats And Cytotoxic Effects Of Isolates Against Vero Cells. J. Food Prot 2003;66:1374–1378
  • 23 Morita Y, Maruyama S, Kabeya H, Boonmar S, Nimsuphan B, Nagai A. et al.Isolation And Phylogenetic Analysis Of Arcobacter Spp. In Ground Chicken Meat and Environmental Water In Japan And Thailand. Microbiol. Immunol 2004;48:527-533
  • 24 Houf K, Devriese L, Haesebrouck F: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns Of Arcobacter Butzleri And Arcobacter Cryaerophilus Strains Isolated From Humans And Broilers. Microb Drug Resist 2004;10:243–247.
  • 25 Halpin-Dohnalek MI, MarthEH. Staphylococcus aureus: Production Of Extracellular Compounds and Behavior in Foods. J. Food Prot.1989;52:267–282.
  • 26 Atabay HI, Aydin F. Susceptibility of Arcobacter butzleri Isolates to 23 Antimicrobial Agents. Lett Appl Microbiol 2001;33:430–433
  • 27 Okoli IC. Antimicrobial Resistance Profile Of E. Coli Isolated From Free Range Chickens In Urban And Rural Environments Of Imo State, Nigeria. On Line Journal Of Health And Allied Sciences 2006;5:1-11.