CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU 2014; 04(04): 042-045
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1703830
Original Article

PERCEPTION REGARDING FEMALE FETICIDE AMONG FEMALES ATTENDING OUT PATIENT DEPARTMENTS OF SELECTED HOSPITAL OF LUDHIANA CITY

Mamta Choudhary
1  Assistant Professor, Institute of Nursing, Guru Teg Bahadur Sahib © Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Although the Indian girl child's position is precarious throughout the country, she remains the most vulnerable in Punjab.

Objectives: To assess the perception of females regarding female feticide.

Study Design: Cross- sectional study.

Materials and Methods: The study involved collection of information regarding perception of females about female feticide using multiple-choice questionnaire. Two hundred and fifty female patients attending medical and surgical OPD's of selected hospital were recruited in the study by using simple random sampling.

Results: Majority of the females perceived that male child is more preferred in society. Moreover, majority of subjects have the view that female feticide has harmful impact on the society and should be stopped. The suggestion given by subjects to curb this evil practice included enforcement of strict laws, punishment to people and doctor involved and creating awareness regarding the issue.



Publication History

Publication Date:
26 April 2020 (online)

© .

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Audio-Visual Review, (1991). Born female, Produced by UNICEF Regional Office for South Central Asia. Govt. of India. Directed by Nilanjana Mukherjee. Indian J Social Work, 52:115-17.
  • 2 Das Gupta, M. (1987). Selective Discrimination against Female children in Rural Punjab, India, Popul Dev Rev, 3:77–100.
  • 3 Female foeticide in India. C 2007. Available from http://www.unicef.org/india/media3285.htm. [cited on 2012 Jun 26]
  • 4 Census of India 2011. Population Census Abstracts. Registrar General of India, New Delhi, Govt. of India.
  • 5 Baligar PV(1999). Mother and girl child.jaipur. Rawat Publication:523-25.
  • 6 Shashi Manhas and Jabina Banoo, (2013). A Study of Beliefs and Perceptions Related to Female Foeticide among Muslim Community in Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India. Stud Home Com Sci, 7(2):125-130 (2013).
  • 7 Dr. Kusum Jain, Dr. Anju Sachdeva, (2013). Attitude of urban society towards female foeticide. Advanced International Research Journal of Teacher Education, 1(1):83-86.
  • 8 Niharika Joshi, Ashu K Bajwa, (2012). Socio- economic intergenerational differences in attitude of rural women towards female foeticide. Stud Home Com Sci, 6(1):57-59
  • 9 Aithal U.B, (2012). A statistical analysis of female foeticide with reference to kolahpur district. International Journal of scientific and research Publication, 2(12):1-5
  • 10 Shaikh Nawal1, Viradiya Hiral2, Thakkar Dhwanee3, Bansal RK4, Shah Dhara1, Shah Shashank1.(2011). Female feticide perceptions and practice among women in Surat city. National Journal of community medicine. 2(3):171-4.
  • 11 Siddharam S. Metri, Venktesh G.M., Thejeshwari H.L., (2011). Awareness regarding Gender preference and female feoticide among teachers. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research, 5(7):1430-1433.
  • 12 A-H.El-Gilany and E. Shady. Determinants and causes of son preferences among women delivering in Mansoura, Egypt. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 13(1):199-128.
  • 13 Arnold F, Kishore S. Roy TK, (2002). Sex selective abortions in India. Population development Review; 28:759-85.
  • 14 S. Sureender, G. Rama Rao & S. Niranjan, (1997). Attitude Towards Female Foeticide: Does it Influence the survival Status of Female Children?. IASSI Quaterly, 16(3):106-114.
  • 15 Srivastav Shalini, Kariwal P, Kapilasrami MC (2011). A Community based study on awareness and perception on gender discrimination and sex preference among married women in a rural population of district bareilly, Uttar Pradesh. National Journal of community medicine, 2(2):273-276.