CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU 2014; 04(03): 080-084
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1703807
Original Article

CLINICAL EVALUATION OF CHEMO-BECHANICAL CARIES REMOVAL USING CARIE-CARE SYSTEM AMONG SCHOOL CHILDREN

Amitha M. Hegde
1  Head of the Department, Department of Conservative Dintistry & Endodontics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte University, Mangalore - 575 018, Karnataka, India.
,
Preethi V. C.
2  P.G. Student, Department of Pedodontics & Preventive Dentistry, Assistant Professor, Department of Conservative Dintistry & Endodontics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte University, Mangalore - 575 018, Karnataka, India.
,
Amarshree Shetty
3  Reader, Department of Pedodontics & Preventive Dentistry, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte University, Mangalore - 575 018, Karnataka, India.
,
Shreema Shetty
4  Assistant Professor, Department of Conservative Dintistry & Endodontics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte University, Mangalore - 575 018, Karnataka, India.
› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Dental caries is considered as one of the most serious dental diseases that results in localized dissolution and destruction of the calcified tooth tissues. As possible alternatives to conventional techniques of caries removal, chemo mechanical caries removal systems have emerged. AIM: To clinically observe the advantages of Chemo-mechanical method of caries removal over Conventional technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 64 teeth of 32children with class 1 open carious lesions were selected for the study from the school dental clinic after taking written consent. They were divided into two equal groups according to method of caries removal (32 chemomechanical and 32 conventional from both primary and permanent teeth respectively). In Group I, caries was removed using the carie-care system and in Group II, with the conventional drill and were restored equally with amalgam and ketac molar respectively. The restored teeth were followed up after 1 week, 1 month, 6 months and 1 year respectively for its clinical success. RESULTS: The results were subjected to statistical analysis using students paired t-test and chi-square tests. It showed that though Chemomechanical technique took a marginal increase in time compared to the conventional technique, it was found to be more comfortable for all the children. Amalgam restorations showed better retention compared to ketac molar restorations in both the techniques. CONCLUSION: Chemomechanical technique though time consuming is definitely superior compared to conventional technique in pediatric dentistry, provided we use a less technique sensitive restorative material which retains in the oral cavity for longer period of time. It is definitely a better treatment protocol in school based dental treatment compared to conventional technique



Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
26. April 2020 (online)

© .

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Elkholany NR, Abdelaziz KM, Zaghloul NM, Aboulenine N.Chemomechanical method: A valuable alternative for caries removal. Journal Of Minimum Intervention In Dentistry, 2009; 2 (4):248-259.
  • 2 Yamada, Yoshishige; Hossain, Mozammal; Nakamura, Yukio; Suzuki, Nobuyuki; Matsumoto, Koukichi. Removal of carious dentin by mechanical, Chemomechanical and Er: YAG Laser in Deciduous teeth.The Journal of Oral Laser Applications,2001;1(2):109-114.
  • 3 Ganesh.M and Dhaval Parikh.Chemomechanical caries removal (CMCR) agents: Review and clinical application in primary teeth.Journal of Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, March 2011; 3(3):34-45.
  • 4 Stewart JM, Marcus M, Christesen P, Lin W. Comprehensive treatment among dental school patients with high and low anxiety. J. Dent. Educ 1994; 5(8):697-700
  • 5 Munshi AK, Hegde AM, Shetty PK. Clinical evaluation of carisolv in the chemomechanical removal of carious dentin. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2001;26:49-54
  • 6 Hosoya Y, Shinkawa H, Marshal GW. Influence of Carisolv on resin adhesion for two different adhesive systems to sound human primary dentin and young permanent dentin. J Dent 2005;33:283-91
  • 7 Michelle M, Luis F. Chemomechanical caries removal: current evidences. RBO,2005; 62(4):125-129