CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU 2014; 04(03): 075-079
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1703806
Original Article

AN INVITRO COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TEETH OBTURATED WITH RESILON AND GUTTA-PERCHA

Kiran Halkai
1  Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, SN HKE Dental College, Gulbarga.
,
Rahul Halkai
2  Ph.D Student, Department of Conservative & Endodontics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte University, Mangalore – 575 018, Karnataka.
,
Mithra N. Hegde
3  Senior Professor & HOD, Department of Conservative & Endodontics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte University, Mangalore – 575 018, Karnataka.
,
Vijay Kumar
4  Senior Lecturers, Department of Community Dentistry, M.N.R. Dental College, Sangareddy, Andhra Pradesh, India.
,
Arpita› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Aim: To compare and evaluate in-vitro the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth obturated with resilon & epiphany sealer and guttapercha using different sealers. Epoxy resin based sealer AH-plus and zinc oxide eugenol based sealer-TubliSeal (EWT).

Methodology: sixty four human single rooted maxillary anterior teeth, cleaned stored in 0.9% saline. All the teeth were decoronated to root length 14mm and bucco-lingual diameter of 5-7mm, After access openings teeth were instrumented using K3.06 up to final apical size 30/.06 and randomly allocated into 4 experimental groups (n=16 per group). Group 1(Control group): teeth were instrumented but not obturated, Group 2: Resilon cones and epiphany SE-sealer. Group 3: guttapercha cones and epoxy based sealer AH plus. Group 4: guttapercha and Tubli seal EWT. Coronal seal was done using IRM cement. Each of the specimens were tested for fracture resistance by instron universal testing machine.

Results: Higher fracture resistance values were observed for group 2 (Resilon & Epiphany SE sealer) followed by group 3(Guttapercha & AH Plus sealer) and group 4(Guttapercha & TubliSeal EWT) when compared to group1 (control-instrumented but not obturated).

Conclusion: filling the root canals with contemporary polymer based root canal obturating system- Resilon increased the in vitro fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.



Publication History

Publication Date:
26 April 2020 (online)

© .

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Cohen S, Burns R. Pathways of Pulp. 8 edi. St Louis: Mosby; 2002.
  • 2 Holcomb J Q, Pilts D, Nicholls J I. Further investigation of spreader loads required to cause vertical root fracture during lateral condensation. J Endod 1987; 13:277-84.
  • 3 Helfer A R, Melnick S, Schilder H. Determination of moisture content of vital and pulpless teeth. Oral surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972; 34:661-70.
  • 4 Lewinstein L, Grajower R. Root dentin hard ed teeth.. J Endod 1981; 7(4); 151-5.
  • 5 Sim TPC, Knowles JC, Shelton J, Gulabivala K. Effect of sodium hypochlorite on mechanical properties of dentine and tooth surface strain. Int Endod J 2001;34:120-32.
  • 6 Saw LH,Messer HH. Root strains associated with different obturation techniques. J Endod 1995;21:314-20.
  • 7 Kishen A. Mechanisms and risk factors for fracture predilection in endodontically treated teeth. Endod Topics 2006;13(1):57-78.
  • 8 Hammed M, Qualtrough A, Silikas N. Effect of new obturating materials on vertical root fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth JOE 2007;33(6):732-736.
  • 9 Whitworth J. Methods of filling root canals: Principles and practices. Endo Topics 2005;12(2):2-24.
  • 10 Schafer E, Olthoff G. Effect of Three different sealers on the sealing References: ability of both thermafil obturators and cold laterally compacted Gutta- percha Endod 2002;28:423-6.
  • 11 Monaghan P,Bajalcaliev JG, Kaminski EJ, Lautenschlager EP. A method for producing experimental simple vertical root fractures in dog teeth. J Endod 1993;19;512-5
  • 12 Epiphany soft resin Endodontic obturation system manufacturer's instruction hand book.Pentron Clinical technologies LLC. Wallingford CT.
  • 13 .Weis MV, Parashos P, Messer HH. Effect of obturation technique on sealer cement thickness and dentinal tubule penetration. Int Endod J 2004;37:653-63.
  • 14 Williams C, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Pashley DH, Tay FR.A comparision of cohesive strength and stiffness of Resilon and gutta percha. J Endod 2006; 32(6):553-5.
  • 15 Apicella MJ, Loushine RJ, West LA, Runyan DA. A comparision of root fracture resistance using two root canal sealers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 89:376-80
  • 16 )Greene HA, Wong M and Ingram TA. Comparision of the sealing ability of four obturation techniques. J Endod 1990;16(9):423-28.
  • 17 Texieira FB, Texieira EC, Thompson JY, Trope M. Fracture resistance of roots endodontically treated with a new resin filling material. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004; 135(5):646-52.