CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU 2011; 01(04): 55-56
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1703544
Case Report


Remya K.
1  K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte University, Mangalore - 575018
Ashwin Krishnamurthy
2  Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore- 575001
Kavitha K.
1  K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte University, Mangalore - 575018
› Author Affiliations


Communications between musculocutaneous nerve and median nerve may be of considerable significance to neurologists and orthopaedicians when dealing with patients of nerve entrapment syndromes of the upper limb. Many authors have mentioned about an occurrence of such a variation previously, but the presence of a communication between the two nerves in both the arms has not been cited to the best of our knowledge. During routine dissection on a 72 year old male cadaver for the under graduate students in the Department of Anatomy at K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, we encountered an anomalous communication between musculocutaneous and median nerve in both the upper limbs. The communicating branch arose from the musculocutaneous nerve at a distance of 12.6 cm and 12.5 cm from the tip of coracoid process on right and left side and joined the median nerve 16.2 cm from the same bony point. Communications between nerves like this may explain abnormal debilities in certain cases of trauma of the upper arm. Lack of awareness of such variations with different patterns of communications between musculocutaneous and median nerve might complicate surgical repair of the nerves.

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 May 2020 (online)

© .

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

  • References

  • 1 Alnot JY, Huten B. Systematisation of the brachial plexus. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1977; 68: 27-34.
  • 2 Standring S. Gray's anatomy. The anatomical basis of clinical practice. 39th ed. London: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005.
  • 3 Venieratos D, Anagnostopoulou S. Classification of communications between the musculocutaneous and median nerves. Clin Anat 1998; 11: 327–331.
  • 4 Eglseder WA Jr, Goldman M. Anatomic variations of the musculocutaneous nerve in the arm. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1997; 26: 777–780.
  • 5 Loukas M, Aqueelah H. Musculocutaneous and median nerve connections within, proximal and distal to the coracobrachialis muscle. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2005; 64: 101–108.
  • 6 Prasada Rao PV, Chaudhary SC. Communication of the musculocutaneous nerve with the median nerve. East Afr Med J. 2000; 77: 498–503.
  • 7 Chauhan R, Roy TS. Communication between the median and musculocutaneous nerve – a case report. J Anat Soc India. 2002; 51: 72–75.
  • 8 Kosugi K, Morita T, Koda M, Yamashita H. Branching pattern of the musculocutaneous nerve. 1. Case possessing normal biceps brachii. Jikeikai Med J. 1986; 33: 63–71.
  • 9 Sanes HD, Reh TA, Harris WA. Development of the nervous system. 1st Ed. New York, Academic Press. 2000; 189–197.
  • 10 Miller RA. Comparative studies upon the morphology and distribution of the brachial plexus. Am J Anat. 1934; 54: 143–175.
  • 11 Moore KL, Dalley AF. Clinically oriented anatomy. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999.