Subscribe to RSS
Download PDF
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1702963
Manguito capturado: Um fator de mau prognóstico no reparo do manguito rotador
Article in several languages: português | EnglishAuthors
Resumo
Objetivo Descrever uma nova apresentação de ruptura e rerruptura do manguito rotador (MR), a qual denominamos manguito capturado (MC). Objetivamos também avaliá-la clinicamente e por meio de imagens.
Métodos Foram avaliados retrospectivamente 16 pacientes com diagnóstico intraoperatório de MC no período de março de 2005 a setembro de 2017; por meio de exames de imagem (radiografia e ressonância magnética [RM]) e escores funcionais (UCLA e Constant & Murley). Nas imagens, analisamos a evolução para artropatia do manguito rotador e presença de rerrupturas. Funcionalmente, comparamos o lado afetado com o contralateral e as lesões extensas com nãoextensas.
Resultados Cinco (31,25%) pacientes evoluíram com artropatia do manguito rotador e 10 (62,5%) tiveram rerrupturas. Três (75%) pacientes com lesões não extensas tiveram UCLA e Constant & Murley bons/excelentes. Nos pacientes com lesões extensas, quando avaliado Constant & Murley, 6 (50%) apresentaram resultados bons/excelentes, e no escore UCLA, 7 (58,3%). Comparando o lado acometido (Constant 74,72 pontos; UCLA 20 pontos) com o contralateral (Constant 96,96 pontos; UCLA 25,63 pontos), houve pior resultado funcional com significância estatística.
Conclusão O diagnóstico de MC é suspeitado por achados característicos na RM e confirmado na artroscopia. Os ombros acometidos apresentam piores escores funcionais pós-operatórios.
Publication History
Received: 18 March 2019
Accepted: 05 December 2019
Article published online:
17 July 2020
© 2020. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
Referências
- 1 Chen AL, Mears SC, Hawkins RJ. Orthopaedic care of the aging athlete. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005; 13 (06) 407-416
- 2 Codman EA. Rupture of the supraspinatus tendon and other lesions in or about the subacromial bursa. The shoulder. Boston: Thomas Todd; 1934
- 3 Brislin KJ, Field LD, Savoie FH 3rd. Complications after arthros- copic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 2007;23(02):124–128
- 4 Huberty DP, Schoolfield JD, Brady PC, Vadala AP, Arrigoni P, Burkhart SS. Incidence and treatment of postoperative stiffness following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 2009; 25 (08) 880-890
- 5 Paxton ES, Teefey SA, Dahiya N, Keener JD, Yamaguchi K, Galatz LM. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of failed repairs of large or massive rotator cuff tears: minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (07) 627-632
- 6 Choi S, Kim MK, Kim GM, Roh YH, Hwang IK, Kang H. Factors associated with clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a suture bridge technique in medium, large, and massive tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014; 23 (11) 1675-1681
- 7 Cho NS, Lee BG, Rhee YG. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a suture bridge technique: is the repair integrity actually maintained?. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (10) 2108-2116
- 8 Godinho GG, França FO, Freitas JM, et al. Resultado do tratamento cirúrgico artroscópico das re-rupturas do manguito rotador do ombro. Rev Bras Ortop 2015;50(01):89–93
- 9 Miyazaki AN, Fregoneze M, Santos PD, et al. Evaluation of the results from reoperations on patients with rotator cuff lesions. Rev Bras Ortop 2011;46(01):45–50
- 10 Mormino MA, Gross RM, McCarthy JA. Captured shoulder: a complication of rotator cuff surgery. Arthroscopy 1996; 12 (04) 457-461
- 11 Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987; (214) 160-164
- 12 Amstutz HC, Sew Hoy AL, Clarke IC. UCLA anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981; (155) 7-20
- 13 Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974; 2 (7889): 1127-1131
- 14 Hamada K, Fukuda H, Mikasa M, Kobayashi Y. Roentgenographic findings in massive rotator cuff tears. A long-term observation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; (254) 92-96
- 15 Seebauer L. Biomecanical classification of cuff tear arthropaty [abstract]. In: Global Shoulder Society Meeting; 2003 July 17–19 Salt Lake City, UT-USA
- 16 Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Moriishi J. Functional and structural outcome after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: single-row versus dual-row fixation. Arthroscopy 2005; 21 (11) 1307-1316
- 17 Gerber C, Fuchs B, Hodler J. The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82 (04) 505-515
- 18 Boehm D. Valuation of the Constant score. In: Habermeyer P, Magosch P, Lichtenberg S. editors. Classifications and scores of the shoulder. Heidelberg: Springer; 2006: 20-21
- 19 Kim JH, Hong IT, Ryu KJ, Bong ST, Lee YS, Kim JH. Retear rate in the late postoperative period after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (11) 2606-2613
- 20 Agout C, Berhouet J, Bouju Y. et al. Clinical and anatomic results of rotator cuff repair at 10 years depend on tear type. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26 (08) 2490-2497
- 21 Collin P, Colmar M, Thomazeau H. et al. Clinical and MRI Outcomes 10 Years After Repair of Massive Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100 (21) 1854-1863
- 22 Miyazaki AN, da Silva LA, Santos PD, Checchia SL, Cohen C, Giora TS. Evaluation of the results from arthroscopic surgical treatment of rotator cuff injuries in patients aged 65 years and over. Rev Bras Ortop 2015; 50 (03) 305-311
- 23 Godinho GG, França FdeO, Alves FJ, et al. Evaluation of anatomical integrity using ultrasound exanination and functional integrity using the Constant & Murley score, of the rotator cuff following arthroscopic repair. Rev Bras Ortop 2015;45(02):174–180
- 24 Abechain JJK, Godinho GG, Matsunaga FT, Netto NA, Daou JP, Tamaoki MJS. Functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair. World J Orthop 2017; 8 (08) 631-637
- 25 Kido T, Itoi E, Konno N, Sano A, Urayama M, Sato K. The depressor function of biceps on the head of the humerus in shoulders with tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000; 82 (03) 416-419
- 26 Ikemoto RY, Pileggi PE, Murachovsky J, et al. Tenotomy with or without tenodesis of the long head of the biceps using repair of the rotator cuff. Rev Bras Ortop 2012;47(06):736–740
- 27 Frank JM, Chahal J, Frank RM, Cole BJ, Verma NN, Romeo AA. The role of acromioplasty for rotator cuff problems. Orthop Clin North Am 2014; 45 (02) 219-224
- 28 Galliera E, Randelli P, Dogliotti G. et al. Matrix metalloproteases MMP-2 and MMP-9: are they early biomarkers of bone remodelling and healing after arthroscopic acromioplasty?. Injury 2010; 41 (11) 1204-1207
- 29 Millett PJ, Horan MP, Maland KE, Hawkins RJ. Long-term survivorship and outcomes after surgical repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011; 20 (04) 591-597
- 30 Parada SA, Dilisio MF, Kennedy CD. Management of complications after rotator cuff surgery. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2015;8(01):40–52