Time-Enhancement Curve of Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography Predicts Aneurysm Enlargement with Type-II Endoleak after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Abstract

Objective We investigated the hemodynamic features of Type-II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using four-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) to identify patients with aneurysm enlargement.

Methods During a 13-month period (January 2017–January 2018) at our institution, we performed 4D-CT examinations in 13 patients after EVAR because of suspected Type-II endoleaks. Three patients were excluded from the study because of other endoleaks or absence of detectable endoleaks. The ramaining 10 patients were divided into two groups: enlargement group (n = 4), in which the aneurysm volume increased, and stable group (n = 6), in which the aneurysm remained stable or shrank. A CT scanner and three-dimensional workstation were used. All images were obtained using a consistent protocol (22 phase scans using the test bolus tracking method). We analyzed the hemodynamics of the endoleak cavity (EC) relative to those of the aorta and evaluated the time-enhancement curves (TECs) using measurement protocols. The strengths of correlations between these factors in the two groups were analyzed statistically.

Results TECs in the enlargement group showed a more gradual curve, and the upslope, the gradient of TEC in the ascending phase and the upslope index were significantly more gradual than those in the stable group (p = 0.0247, 0.0243). The EC washout and the EC washout index were also more gradual than in the stable group's (p = 0.019, 0.019). The enhancement duration was longer in the former than in the latter (80%, p = 0.0195; 70%, p = 0.0159; 60%, p = 0.0159). The CT number in the equilibrium phase was larger in the enlargement group than in the stable group (p = 0.019).

Conclusion The 4D-CT is useful for predicting aneurysm enlargement with Type-II endoleaks after EVAR.

Keywords

endovascular aneurysm repair - Type-II endoleak - computed tomography - time-enhancement curve

• References

• 1 Veith FJ, Baum RA, Ohki T. , et al. Nature and significance of endoleaks and endotension: summary of opinions expressed at an international conference. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35 (05) 1029-1035
• 2 Rhee SJ, Ohki T, Veith FJ, Kurvers H. Current status of management of type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 2003; 17 (03) 335-344
• 3 van Marrewijk C, Buth J, Harris PL, Norgren L, Nevelsteen A, Wyatt MG. Significance of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: The EUROSTAR experience. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35 (03) 461-473
• 4 Baum RA, Carpenter JP, Golden MA. , et al. Treatment of type 2 endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: comparison of transarterial and translumbar techniques. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35 (01) 23-29
• 5 van Marrewijk CJ, Fransen G, Laheij RJ, Harris PL, Buth J. ; EUROSTAR Collaborators. Is a type II endoleak after EVAR a harbinger of risk? Causes and outcome of open conversion and aneurysm rupture during follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004; 27 (02) 128-137
• 6 Bernhard VM, Mitchell RS, Matsumura JS. , et al. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35 (06) 1155-1162
• 7 Bargellini I, Napoli V, Petruzzi P. , et al. Type II lumbar endoleaks: hemodynamic differentiation by contrast-enhanced ultrasound scanning and influence on aneurysm enlargement after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2005; 41 (01) 10-18
• 8 Timaran CH, Ohki T, Rhee SJ. , et al. Predicting aneurysm enlargement in patients with persistent type II endoleaks. J Vasc Surg 2004; 39 (06) 1157-1162
• 9 Dias NV, Ivancev K, Resch TA, Malina M, Sonesson B. Endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair lead to nonuniform intra-aneurysm sac pressure. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46 (02) 197-203
• 10 Keedy AW, Yeh BM, Kohr JR, Hiramoto JS, Schneider DB, Breiman RS. Evaluation of potential outcome predictors in type II Endoleak: a retrospective study with CT angiography feature analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197 (01) 234-240
• 11 Yamaguchi T, Takahashi D. [Development of test bolus tracking method and usefulness in coronary CT angiography]. Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 2009; 65 (08) 1032-1040
• 12 Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 48 (03) 452-458
• 13 Ohki T, Veith FJ, Shaw P. , et al. Increasing incidence of midterm and long-term complications after endovascular graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a note of caution based on a 9-year experience. Ann Surg 2001; 234 (03) 323-334 , discussion 334–335
• 14 Sarac TP, Gibbons C, Vargas L. , et al. Long-term follow-up of type II endoleak embolization reveals the need for close surveillance. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55 (01) 33-40
• 15 Demehri S, Signorelli J, Kumamaru KK. , et al. Volumetric quantification of type II endoleaks: an indicator for aneurysm sac growth following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Radiology 2014; 271 (01) 282-290
• 16 Müller-Wille R, Schötz S, Zeman F. , et al. CT features of early type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms help predict aneurysm sac enlargement. Radiology 2015; 274 (03) 906-916
• 17 Lehmkuhl L, Andres C, Lücke C. , et al. Dynamic CT angiography after abdominal aortic endovascular aneurysm repair: influence of enhancement patterns and optimal bolus timing on endoleak detection. Radiology 2013; 268 (03) 890-899